The FTC warns crooks are running a second wave of refund-recovery scams on people already burned once

The Federal Trade Commission has issued a fresh warning about a particularly cruel category of fraud: schemes that deliberately target people who have already lost money to a scam. In a consumer alert published in early August 2026, the agency called these refund and recovery scams the worst of the absolute worst, because they prey a second time on victims who are anxious to get their money back. The pitch is simple and effective, and the promise at its center, that a stranger can recover lost funds for a fee, is the tell.

How refund-recovery scammers find their targets

These operators do not stumble onto their victims. According to the FTC, refund and recovery scammers buy lists of people who have already been defrauded, then work through those lists hoping the same individuals can be tricked again. The purchased data can be detailed, sometimes including a person’s name, address, and phone number, along with the type of scam that snared them and how much they paid. That specificity is what makes the follow-up approach so convincing, because the caller or emailer often already knows painful details of the original loss.

The FTC laid out the mechanics in its August consumer alert, describing a market in which victim information is treated as a commodity. Being contacted by someone who seems to know about a prior scam is therefore not proof of legitimacy; it is often a sign that a person’s details have been resold to a new set of criminals.

The impersonation at the heart of the pitch

To sound trustworthy, the scammers wrap themselves in authority. The FTC says they may claim to represent a government agency, sometimes even the FTC itself, or a consumer advocacy group or a law firm. The impersonation is designed to lower a victim’s guard, since a call that appears to come from an official source carries an assumption of good faith. In reality, the agency stresses, the claimed affiliation is a lie meant to make the eventual request for money seem routine.

Once the false credibility is established, the ask follows. Targets are told to pay a retainer fee, a processing fee, or an administrative charge before the promised refund can be released. In other versions, the scammer asks for bank-account or other financial information under the pretense of depositing the recovered funds. Either path ends the same way: a victim who pays loses more money, and a victim who shares financial details risks having their identity stolen on top of the original loss.

The rule that exposes every version of the scheme

The FTC’s guidance reduces to a single, durable principle. Legitimate organizations, and government agencies in particular, never require an up-front payment or financial information in exchange for help getting a refund. Anyone who demands money to unlock a refund is, by definition, running a scam. That rule holds regardless of how official the caller sounds, how much they seem to know, or how urgent they make the situation feel.

The agency’s broader material on refund and recovery scams reinforces the point that no genuine recovery effort begins with a fee. Consumers can use that standard as a fast filter: the moment a supposed helper asks to be paid before delivering anything, the conversation should end.

Steps the FTC recommends for anyone contacted

The commission offers concrete defenses. It advises against trusting anyone who reaches out claiming they can recover lost money for a fee, and it warns people never to pay in advance for a refund or for help obtaining one. It also urges independent verification: consumers can search online for the name of whoever contacted them, adding words like complaint, scam, or review, to see whether others have reported the same approach.

Verifying contact information matters just as much. The FTC recommends that people look up the phone number or website of any government agency on their own rather than using a number a caller provides, since scammers routinely supply lines that ring straight back to their own operation. Slowing down long enough to confirm identity through an independent channel defeats the urgency the scheme relies on.

What genuine recovery looks like, and where to report

There are real, if limited, avenues for people trying to reclaim money after a scam. The FTC points victims toward practical steps in its guidance on what to do after being scammed, which covers actions such as trying to stop or reverse a transaction and contacting the bank, card issuer, or payment platform involved. Those steps are free, and none of them requires paying a middleman to intervene.

Reporting also plays a role. The agency asks people who encounter or fall for these schemes to file a report with the FTC and to contact their state attorney general, both of which help authorities track patterns and pursue the operations behind them. Reporting will not always recover a specific loss, but it feeds the enforcement and data-gathering that can disrupt the lists and call centers driving the fraud.

The through-line of the FTC’s warning is that a prior scam does not close the door on further targeting; it can open it. Criminals treat a documented loss as a lead, and they dress up the follow-up in the language of rescue. Recognizing that no legitimate refund ever starts with a fee, verifying any unexpected contact independently, and reporting suspicious offers give consumers a straightforward way to keep a single loss from becoming two.

This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by Morning Overview editors prior to publication.

More from Morning Overview