Of three compact sedans compared on Insurance Institute for Highway Safety results, only the Mazda 3 earned a Top Safety Pick+ award. The 2026 Toyota Corolla was rated Marginal in the institute’s moderate overlap front crash test, and the 2027 Volkswagen Jetta fell short for a different reason: Marginal ratings for headlights and for pedestrian crash prevention. Autoblog’s Karl Furlong laid out the three sets of results on Oct. 23, 2026.
AI, explained every day: The Deep View is the go-to daily newsletter for 600,000+ founders, knowledge workers and professionals who want to stay up to date with artificial intelligence.
We may earn a commission if you sign up.
The comparison is useful because the three cars look alike on paper. Each is a small, mainstream sedan aimed at the same buyer, and each posted a Good rating in the small overlap front test. The differences show up in the tests that follow, and a single weak result in any one of them is enough to cost a car the award. The Corolla shows it most clearly, since Autoblog’s table gives it Good in every other row yet no award. The Jetta, by contrast, collected two Marginal ratings in non-crash categories, and the Mazda 3 avoided anything below Acceptable across the board.
The moderate overlap front test that sank the Corolla
The IIHS moderate overlap front test sends a vehicle at 40 mph into a stationary barrier, with 40 percent of the front overlapping the barrier. The institute says the setup represents two vehicles moving toward each other at a little under 40 mph each. Instruments in the dummies measure injury risk to the head, neck, chest, legs and feet, and a belt-tension sensor and chest pressure mat measure chest injury risk for the second-row dummy. Because ratings are comparable only among vehicles of similar weight, a Good, Acceptable, Marginal or Poor result applies to that vehicle against its own weight class and not against lighter or heavier cars.
The Corolla scored Marginal in that test, according to Autoblog’s comparison. The site wrote that rear-seat passengers “were found to be vulnerable to chest injuries,” and that the moderate overlap result was what disqualified the Toyota from an award. IIHS says it does not accept manufacturer test data for the updated moderate overlap test, so the institute ran it. The Corolla otherwise did well: Good in small overlap front, Good in side, Good for headlights and Good in both crash-prevention evaluations.
The Mazda 3 and the Top Safety Pick+ criteria
According to Autoblog, a car needs Good ratings in every crash test to qualify for a Top Safety Pick or Top Safety Pick+, and its crash-prevention systems must be at least Acceptable. The Mazda 3 had no score below Acceptable and received the top award. Its crash tests were all Good, including the moderate overlap front and side tests. Its vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention was Acceptable, its pedestrian crash prevention was Good, and its headlight rating is listed as Good or Acceptable.
The scorecard is a long-lived design. Autoblog notes that the Mazda 3 has been on sale since 2019 without a major facelift, which makes the award a result for an older car rather than a freshly engineered one. The same report lists the CX-30, CX-5, CX-50, CX-70, CX-90 and the Mazda 3 Hatchback among other Mazdas with the Top Safety Pick+, and says Mazda was named top brand earlier in 2026 in the Consumer Reports Safety Verdict. Test definitions are on the institute’s overview of its eight current tests.
The Jetta’s headlights and pedestrian crash prevention
The Jetta missed out in other tests. Autoblog’s table gives the 2027 model Good in small overlap and moderate overlap front tests, Acceptable in the side test, Marginal for headlights and Marginal for pedestrian crash prevention; vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention was not tested. The report says the side-impact and pedestrian results ruled out an award and that the Jetta “was unable to avoid a collision with a pedestrian in certain tests.” The institute lists the criteria for ratings and awards in its test protocols and technical information.
Shoppers can compare any model year on the institute’s vehicle ratings pages. The three results show how an award can turn on one weak category. The Corolla missed on a crash test in which rear-seat chest injury risk was the concern, while the Jetta missed on lighting and on avoiding a pedestrian. The Mazda 3 had no result below Acceptable in any of the tests Autoblog reports, which is the whole gap between the winner and the other two cars.
The Corolla, Mazda 3 and Jetta results come from a single comparison published by Autoblog on Oct. 23, 2026, and the individual IIHS ratings pages are the place to confirm any one result before relying on it. The Mazda 3 model year is not specified in that comparison, and the Mazda headlight rating appears there as Good or Acceptable rather than one grade, so both points are left as the source gives them.
This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by Morning Overview editors prior to publication.
AI, explained every day: Get The Deep View →
We may earn a commission if you sign up.
More from Morning Overview
- Hurricane Hunter radar shows four warning signs that a tropical cyclone is about to strengthen, a University of Miami study found
- Tropical Storm Rachel is dumping up to 12 inches on four Mexican states on its way to major hurricane strength
- The FTC says Lens.com doubled the price shoppers saw in Google ads
- Common allergy, bladder and sleep pills tied to sharply higher dementia odds
