Skip to main content

Morning Overview

Lightning can strike the same tall tower hundreds of times in a single year

Lightning is often imagined as a random, one-time strike, but certain tall structures around the world are hit with startling regularity, some absorbing dozens or even hundreds of strikes in a single year. Skyscrapers, radio towers and other tall, isolated structures act as natural lightning rods, and the taller and more exposed a structure is, the more often it becomes the path of least resistance for a bolt seeking the ground. Engineers have studied this repeated-strike phenomenon closely, since understanding exactly why certain towers draw so much lightning has shaped how modern tall buildings are designed and protected.

Why Height Turns a Structure Into a Lightning Magnet

Lightning forms when the buildup of electrical charge inside a thunderstorm becomes great enough to overcome the insulating resistance of the surrounding air, discharging in a sudden channel that connects the storm cloud to the ground. That discharge does not travel in a perfectly straight line toward the nearest patch of earth; it seeks out the shortest, most conductive path available, and a tall structure effectively shortens the distance the discharge has to travel through open air. As a structure’s height increases, it also becomes more likely to generate its own upward-reaching streamer, a small electrical discharge that rises to meet the descending lightning channel partway, further increasing the odds that the strike connects there rather than at ground level somewhere nearby.

How Often the Tallest Buildings Actually Get Struck

The clearest illustration of this effect comes from some of the world’s tallest structures, several of which are struck with a regularity that would be extraordinary for an ordinary building. Very tall towers in regions with frequent thunderstorm activity have been documented taking dozens of strikes annually, and some especially exposed structures accumulate far more over the course of a single stormy season, consistent with observational data on lightning behavior around tall structures. The exact count varies from year to year depending on regional storm frequency, but the underlying pattern holds consistently: isolated height is the single strongest predictor of how often a structure gets struck, more than any other physical characteristic of the building itself.

A Famous Case Study in Repeated Strikes

Few buildings illustrate the phenomenon as clearly as the Empire State Building in New York City, which for decades stood as one of the tallest structures in the region and became something of an accidental laboratory for lightning research as a result. Engineers and researchers documented the building taking dozens of strikes in some years, with its spire acting as the preferred point of contact during passing thunderstorms. That repeated exposure turned the building into an early proving ground for lightning protection systems, since engineers could observe firsthand how a properly grounded structure handled repeated direct hits without sustaining serious damage. The building’s experience helped establish some of the basic principles that now guide lightning protection on skyscrapers, transmission towers and other tall structures built in the decades since.

How Modern Towers Are Engineered to Survive Repeated Hits

Because tall structures cannot avoid being struck, engineers instead design them to survive the strikes safely, using a network of conductive materials that channel the electrical current harmlessly into the ground rather than through the structure itself. A typical lightning protection system includes a network of air terminals or rods positioned at the highest points of a building, connected by heavy conductive cables running down the exterior or through dedicated internal channels, all tied into a grounding system buried deep enough to safely disperse the current. When designed and maintained correctly, this system allows a tower to absorb a direct strike with no damage beyond a brief flash and thunderclap, which is why the tallest buildings in lightning-prone regions can be struck dozens of times a year for decades without structural harm.

Why the Pattern Matters Beyond Skyscrapers

The same physics that draws lightning to tall buildings also applies to communication towers, wind turbines, transmission lines and even isolated trees on open ground, all of which face elevated strike risk in proportion to how much they stand out from their surroundings. That is part of why utility companies and telecommunications firms invest heavily in grounding and surge protection for tall infrastructure, since a single unprotected strike can knock out service or equipment across a wide area. Understanding why certain structures draw repeated strikes has become less a curiosity and more a practical engineering discipline, one that shapes how tall infrastructure of every kind, not just record-setting skyscrapers, gets built and protected today.

A Practice With Roots Stretching Back to Benjamin Franklin

The basic principle behind modern lightning protection dates back centuries, to Benjamin Franklin’s experiments with grounded metal rods in the 18th century, which demonstrated that a pointed conductor connected to the earth could safely intercept a strike rather than letting a building’s own structure serve as the path to ground. Franklin’s original design was far simpler than today’s engineered systems, but the underlying concept, giving lightning an easier, controlled route to the ground than through occupied structure, has remained essentially unchanged even as materials and installation methods have advanced considerably.

Modern building codes in many countries now require lightning protection systems on structures above certain height thresholds or in particularly exposure-prone locations, reflecting how thoroughly the once-novel idea has become standard engineering practice. Insurance underwriters and building inspectors also factor lightning protection into risk assessments for very tall or isolated structures, since the cost of repairing a building after storm damage typically far exceeds the cost of installing a proper grounding system during original construction.

This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by Morning Overview editors.


More from Morning Overview