Nissan has stated that the electric motor destined for its next-generation Leaf will use roughly 90% fewer rare-earth elements than the outgoing design, a target the automaker describes as central to hitting a 30% reduction in EV development and manufacturing costs by 2026. The claim is outlined as part of Nissan’s “X-in-1” modular powertrain strategy. However, the specific 90% figure has not been traced to a dated press release, named executive quote, or standalone technical disclosure; it appears in Nissan’s forward-looking corporate strategy materials alongside the broader cost-reduction roadmap. If delivered, it would represent one of the most aggressive rare-earth cuts any major automaker has publicly committed to for a mass-market vehicle.
Rare-earth elements like neodymium and dysprosium are the backbone of the permanent magnets inside most EV motors. They deliver high torque density in a compact package, but they come with baggage: volatile pricing, concentrated supply chains, and geopolitical risk. China controls roughly 60% of global rare-earth mining and closer to 90% of processing, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Any automaker that can design around that dependency gains a meaningful cost and supply advantage.
Nissan’s track record on rare-earth reduction
This is not Nissan’s first attempt to strip rare earths from the Leaf’s drivetrain. When the company refreshed the original Leaf in late 2012, it announced a 40% reduction in rare-earth content for the car’s electric motor, a figure reported at the time the updated vehicle went on sale. That earlier cut was tied to a real production car and has not been publicly disputed, giving Nissan a documented baseline of delivering on similar promises.
The jump from 40% to 90%, however, is a different order of magnitude. Nissan’s broader electrification roadmap, reported by the Associated Press, confirms the X-in-1 approach and the 30% cost-reduction target benchmarked against 2019 levels. The AP reporting describes rare-earth and material-cost reduction as a core pillar of that plan, though it does not cite the specific 90% figure. Nissan has not yet published a detailed technical paper or invited independent testing of the new motor.
How the motor might change
Nissan has not disclosed the precise engineering path to 90%. In the broader EV industry, automakers pursuing similar goals have explored several approaches: substituting cheaper ferrite magnets for neodymium-iron-boron units, adopting wound-rotor synchronous motors that replace permanent magnets with electromagnets, or shifting to switched-reluctance designs that use no magnets at all. Each approach involves trade-offs in torque density, efficiency at highway speeds, noise and vibration characteristics, and thermal management.
Without detailed specifications or standardized test results from Nissan, it is not yet possible to confirm whether the 90% reduction comes with compromises in peak power or driving range, or whether the company has managed to maintain or improve on the current Leaf motor’s performance envelope. That gap matters because consumers shopping for an affordable EV will weigh any rare-earth savings against the driving experience they actually get.
Where Nissan stands against rivals
Nissan is not working in isolation. Toyota has publicly demonstrated a magnet-free motor prototype and has said it plans to use the technology in future EVs. BMW’s upcoming “Neue Klasse” platform uses a sixth-generation electric drive that the company says significantly reduces rare-earth content. Tesla has used induction motors (which contain no rare earths) in some Model S and Model 3 variants and has paired them with permanent-magnet units for efficiency. Several Chinese automakers, including BYD, have explored ferrite-based motor designs for lower-cost vehicles.
What sets Nissan’s stated target apart is the specificity of the claimed percentage and its direct link to a named, mass-market model. Most competitors have spoken in broader terms or tied rare-earth reductions to platforms rather than individual cars. Whether that distinction holds up will depend on whether Nissan delivers a production Leaf (or its direct successor) with a motor that independent testing can verify.
What it could mean for EV pricing
Rare-earth costs are a relatively small slice of total EV production expenses compared with battery cells, but they punch above their weight in terms of volatility. Neodymium oxide prices roughly tripled between early 2021 and early 2022 before falling back, and export controls or mining disruptions can trigger sudden spikes that ripple through automaker margins. Removing 90% of that exposure would give Nissan more predictable motor costs and, in theory, more room to hold sticker prices steady during supply crunches.
Nissan’s 30% cost-reduction target is pegged to 2026, and as of spring 2026 the company has not publicly reported final results against that benchmark. How much of any savings reaches consumers, versus being absorbed into margins or reinvested in R&D, remains an open question. But the direction is clear: Nissan is betting that cheaper, less supply-constrained motors are a prerequisite for making EVs competitive with internal-combustion cars on price, not just on running costs.
An ambitious target still awaiting production validation
The 90% figure is best understood as a stated engineering goal backed by a credible track record, not as a production-validated fact. No named Nissan executive or engineer has been quoted on the record confirming the figure in the sources available, and no independent analyst has publicly endorsed or challenged it. Nissan has already demonstrated a 40% rare-earth reduction in a shipping vehicle, has embedded further cuts into a formal corporate cost strategy, and is targeting those savings within a specific timeframe. The company’s willingness to attach a precise number to a named model raises the stakes: if the next Leaf arrives and independent teardowns confirm the claim, it will mark a significant milestone in decoupling EV manufacturing from rare-earth supply risk.
If it falls short, the announcement will join a long list of aspirational targets that did not survive contact with production realities. For now, the most useful lens for consumers and industry watchers is cautious optimism grounded in Nissan’s history of incremental progress and the broader industry momentum toward rare-earth-light motor designs.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
