The numbers coming out of NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center in April 2026 are hard to ignore. The agency’s latest ENSO probability tables put the chance of El Niño developing by the June-through-August window at 79%, with odds climbing above 90% by fall. More striking still, several independent modeling systems are converging on projections that place this event in the same league as the most powerful El Niños since reliable records began in 1950, and some ensemble members push beyond them. For farmers in the Corn Belt, water managers rationing Colorado River allocations, and emergency planners along the Gulf Coast, the signal is loud enough to act on even while key details remain unresolved.
What NOAA’s data actually shows
NOAA tracks El Niño using the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI), a three-month running average of sea surface temperature anomalies in the Niño-3.4 region of the central equatorial Pacific. An El Niño is declared when that index hits +0.5°C above the 1991-2020 baseline and stays there for five consecutive overlapping seasons. The historical record’s heavyweights are the 1997-98 event (ONI peak near +2.4°C), the 2015-16 event (+2.6°C), and the 1982-83 event (+2.2°C). Any talk of a “strongest in recorded history” outcome means surpassing that 2015-16 mark.
The April 2026 probability tables, calculated using NOAA’s RONI methodology, show El Niño likelihood rising on a steep curve: 61% for May through July, 79% for June through August, and above 90% for the September-through-November and October-through-December periods. Alongside those phase probabilities, NOAA publishes a separate conditional strength breakdown that assigns odds to weak, moderate, strong, and very strong outcomes. These strength figures are conditional on El Niño actually materializing, so they should be read together with the phase odds rather than on their own. The fact that NOAA’s framework includes a “very strong” category and assigns it non-trivial probability tells forecasters and planners that an extreme outcome is within the plausible range, even if it is far from guaranteed.
Multiple modeling centers reinforce that picture. The North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) and the European IMME/C3S system, which use fundamentally different computational approaches, are both projecting Niño-3.4 anomalies that climb well above the +1.5°C strong-event threshold by late 2026, with upper-end ensemble members reaching territory that would challenge the 2015-16 record. NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory has released an experimental prediction trace showing a similar trajectory. When independent model families built on different assumptions point in the same direction, forecasters treat the general trend with considerably more confidence, even as the exact peak value remains uncertain.
Early signals in the ocean
Observed conditions in the tropical Pacific are tracking consistently with the early stages of El Niño onset. Subsurface heat content along the equatorial thermocline is elevated, a reservoir of warm water that can fuel rapid surface warming once it is brought upward by shifting ocean currents. Westerly wind bursts have appeared over the western Pacific, weakening the trade winds that normally hold warm water pooled near Indonesia and Australia. Surface temperatures in parts of the central Pacific have already begun creeping above the long-term average.
None of these signals, taken individually, lock in a very strong event. El Niño development can stall, and the atmosphere retains the capacity to surprise. But the combination of subsurface heat loading, wind pattern shifts, and rising surface temperatures is the textbook precursor sequence that preceded the major events of 1997-98 and 2015-16. Forecasters watching these indicators in real time see a Pacific Ocean that is primed.
Why this forecast still carries real uncertainty
The most important caveat is timing. ENSO forecasts issued before summer historically face what climate scientists call the “spring predictability barrier,” a period when the tropical Pacific is transitioning between states and small atmospheric perturbations can nudge the outcome in either direction. Forecasts issued after July tend to verify at significantly higher rates. The April 2026 guidance is unusually strong for this time of year, but it has not yet cleared that barrier.
Strength projections carry wider uncertainty than phase projections. NOAA’s conditional probabilities spread meaningful odds across the moderate, strong, and very strong categories. A high probability of at least a moderate El Niño is not the same thing as certainty of a record breaker. The difference matters enormously for planning: a moderate event reshuffles seasonal weather patterns; a very strong event can trigger billions of dollars in agricultural losses, reshape global commodity markets, and drive catastrophic flooding in parts of South America and drought across Southeast Asia and Australia.
There is also the question of how a developing El Niño will interact with the broader background of elevated global ocean temperatures. The world’s oceans have been running persistently warm outside the Niño-3.4 region, and that baseline warmth can alter the atmospheric teleconnections that translate Pacific warming into weather impacts thousands of miles away. NOAA’s current products focus on the Niño-3.4 index itself rather than on these secondary interactions, so translating a projected ONI peak into specific local consequences requires an additional layer of analysis that has not yet been published for this cycle.
What a very strong El Niño has meant before
History offers a rough guide. The 1997-98 El Niño drove an estimated $35 billion in global damages and was linked to roughly 23,000 deaths worldwide, according to a widely cited assessment by the National Center for Atmospheric Research. California endured a winter of relentless storms that caused mudslides, coastal erosion, and widespread flooding. The U.S. Southwest received well-above-normal rainfall, temporarily easing drought but overwhelming infrastructure. Meanwhile, Indonesia and parts of Australia suffered severe drought, fueling massive wildfires.
The 2015-16 event, the strongest by ONI measurement, brought a different distribution of impacts. California again saw above-normal precipitation in the north, but the hoped-for drought-busting deluge in the south largely failed to materialize, a reminder that no two El Niños play out identically. Globally, 2016 became the hottest year in the instrumental record at that time, with El Niño adding a temporary spike on top of the long-term warming trend. Coral bleaching events devastated reefs across the tropics.
If the 2026-27 event reaches the upper end of current model projections, it would unfold against an ocean that is already warmer than the baseline conditions that preceded either of those earlier episodes. That raises the possibility of compounding effects: El Niño-driven warmth layered on top of already-elevated global temperatures, potentially pushing 2027 into contention for the warmest year on record and intensifying heat-related stresses on agriculture, ecosystems, and public health.
What to watch in the months ahead
For anyone trying to separate signal from noise, the next few months will be decisive. The key indicators to track are updated Niño-3.4 sea surface temperature observations, published weekly by NOAA; successive rounds of model guidance from the NMME and IMME/C3S systems; and any shifts in NOAA’s official phase and strength probabilities when the next monthly update is released.
If observed warming continues to track the higher-end model scenarios into late summer, the case for a potentially historic El Niño will rest on substantially firmer ground. If the atmosphere fails to couple with the ocean warming in the expected way, or if subsurface heat dissipates faster than models project, the event could still land in the moderate-to-strong range rather than the record-breaking territory some ensembles currently suggest.
The evidence as of late May 2026 supports serious, concrete preparation for a significant El Niño. Agricultural operations should be reviewing crop insurance coverage and planting strategies. Municipal water agencies in the Southwest should be updating flood-control and reservoir-management plans. Emergency managers along the Gulf and Southern California coasts should be dusting off storm-response protocols. The probability of El Niño arriving is high enough, and the potential magnitude large enough, that waiting for absolute certainty before acting would itself be a risky choice.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
