Antarctica’s Thwaites Glacier, often called the Doomsday Glacier, is retreating faster than many models anticipated, and with it goes a critical buttress holding back several meters of potential sea level rise. Bigger than Britain and already destabilized by warm ocean currents, it has become a litmus test for how far humanity is willing to go to defend the coastlines where hundreds of millions of people live. The latest proposal, a 150-metre-tall underwater curtain stretching roughly 50 miles, forces a blunt question: are we ready to engineer the ocean itself to buy time, or are we chasing a mirage while the water keeps rising?
I see the seabed curtain idea as a kind of planetary triage, a last-ditch attempt to slow a wound that is already bleeding. The core debate is not just whether such a wall could technically work, but whether it can be built fast enough, governed fairly enough, and paired with deep emissions cuts so it delays disaster rather than simply rearranging it.
Why Thwaites became the world’s scariest glacier
Thwaites Glacier sits in West Antarctica, where its ice flows into the Amundsen Sea through deep channels that let relatively warm water gnaw at its underside. Satellite and radar measurements show that parts of the grounding line, the point where the glacier lifts off the bedrock and begins to float, have retreated several kilometers inland, a sign that the ice sheet’s grip is weakening faster than expected. One analysis of Antarctica describes how the Thwaites Glacier’s grounding zone can shift by up to several kilometers during spring tides, underscoring how sensitive this system is to ocean conditions.
What makes Thwaites uniquely alarming is not only its own mass but the domino it represents. If it collapses, scientists warn that it could eventually unlock around Three meters of global sea level rise by destabilizing neighboring basins that are currently held in check. That is why researchers and policymakers now treat this single glacier as a global risk multiplier, with consequences that would reach from low-lying Pacific islands to major cities like New York and Shanghai, and why it has become a focal point for ambitious interventions such as the proposed seabed curtain described by the bold project to delay devastating sea level rise.
The 150-metre curtain: how the wall would actually work
The Seabed Curtain Project’s central idea is deceptively simple: hang a flexible barrier from anchors on the seafloor so it rises like a submerged dam, blocking the warm deep water that currently funnels through under-ice channels and melts Thwaites from below. The group describes a 150-metre-tall structure, roughly equivalent to a 50-story building, that would be tall enough to intercept the warmest layers while allowing colder surface water and sea life to pass above. According to the project’s own materials, this Seabed Curtain Project is framed as a way to slow, not stop, sea level rise by strategically placing barriers in key channels of the continental shelf.
Engineers envision a curtain that stretches about 50 miles across the most vulnerable under-ice channels, with segments that can flex with currents and icebergs rather than resisting them like a rigid dam. Reporting on the concept notes that the proposed structure would be just under 0.1 miles, or 152 meters, tall and extend roughly 50 miles, or 80 kilometers, across key pathways where warm water currently reaches the glacier’s base, a scale described in detail by technical coverage of the design.
A $50 billion Hail Mary, and who pays for it
Even its backers describe the curtain as a Hail Mary, a last-resort play that would cost on the order of $50 billion to build and deploy. Scientists and Geoengineers who support the idea argue that a 62-mile-long system of curtains around the Doomsday Glacier could delay collapse and protect trillions of dollars in coastal infrastructure, a scale of ambition laid out in reporting on the $50 billion proposal. The raw numbers are staggering, but so are the potential avoided damages if even a fraction of the projected sea level rise is postponed.
Funding such a project would require unprecedented international cooperation, because no single nation owns Thwaites or bears all the risk. Advocates suggest that the cost could be shared by countries whose coastal megacities are most exposed to flooding, from the United States and China to low-lying states that contributed little to the emissions problem but face existential threats. One analysis of the giant Antarctic wall concept notes that proponents hope to have a curtain in place by around 2040, a timeline that collides with the politics of who pays and who decides how such a structure is run.
Engineering in the harshest ocean on Earth
Turning a sketch into steel and fabric in the Amundsen Sea is another matter entirely. The curtain would have to be anchored in deep, stormy waters, survive collisions with icebergs, and operate in temperatures that punish even hardened research vessels. Engineers studying the idea emphasize that the barrier must flex rather than fight the ice, using moored segments and weighted skirts that can move with currents, a concept echoed in descriptions of a flexible underwater curtain designed to block warm ocean currents from reaching the glacier’s underside, as outlined in one proposal that stresses flexibility over rigidity.
Past work on underwater walls to protect glaciers, including earlier ideas that some researchers floated in 2018, shows how quickly such concepts run into practical limits. Analyses of those earlier schemes noted that building walls in front of Antarctic ice shelves would require heavy construction in remote seas, with risks from shifting ice and uncertain long-term performance, concerns that still apply to the new curtain and were raised when Some scientists first suggested underwater walls to keep glaciers from melting away from the Antarctic ice sheet.
What the wall might actually buy us
Supporters of the curtain argue that even a partial slowdown of Thwaites’ retreat could be worth the price, because it might buy decades for coastal communities to adapt. The Seabed Curtain Project frames its goal as delaying, not preventing, sea level rise, estimating that blocking warm water in key channels could hold back up to Three meters of potential global sea level increase that is currently being restrained by a relatively narrow band of ice, a claim highlighted on the project’s own large-scale overview.
Independent scientists are more cautious, stressing that the curtain could at best slow the rate of ice loss rather than freeze it in place. Reporting on the accelerating melt of the Thwaites Glacier notes that the 50-mile barrier is intended to reduce the rate of ice loss, not reverse it, and that the accelerating melt itself is what prompted the unprecedented 50-mile proposal. That distinction matters, because it means the wall is a way to stretch the timeline for adaptation, not a magic fix that lets the world keep burning fossil fuels without consequence.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
