An AARP survey found 11 million older Americans were pushed toward crypto by an online suitor.

Online romance scams used to follow a predictable arc: a flattering message, weeks of attentive conversation, and eventually a request for a wire transfer to cover an emergency. That template still exists, but a newer version has largely replaced it, one where the emotional connection is used to steer a target toward what looks like a legitimate cryptocurrency investment rather than a direct cash request, making the scam harder to recognize as fraud until the money is already gone.

A new survey from AARP puts a number on how widespread that pattern has become among adults in the second half of life, and the figure is large enough to reframe romance-based fraud as a mainstream financial threat rather than a fringe internet danger.

What the Survey Found

According to AARP’s own findings, nearly one in ten adults age 50 and older, an estimated 11 million people, have formed what they believed was a genuine romantic connection online with someone who later asked for financial help or encouraged them to invest in cryptocurrency. The survey found that adults between 50 and 64 face the fake solicitations at more than double the rate of those 65 and older, 13 percent versus 5 percent, a pattern that runs counter to the common assumption that romance scams primarily target the oldest and most isolated seniors.

The mechanism behind these schemes is often described by fraud investigators as “pig butchering,” a term borrowed from a Chinese phrase describing the practice of fattening an animal before slaughter, because scammers deliberately build trust and emotional investment over weeks or months before introducing the supposed investment opportunity. AARP has adopted the term “financial grooming” as an alternative description, while international law enforcement organizations have used “romance baiting” to describe the same pattern.

How the Crypto Pivot Changes the Scam

Unlike older romance-scam scripts built around a single dramatic request, such as bail money or a medical emergency, the cryptocurrency version unfolds gradually. A target is encouraged to open an account on what appears to be a legitimate trading platform, often one the scammer controls or has manipulated to display fake gains, and to make small initial deposits that appear to grow in value. That early success is designed to build confidence before larger transfers are requested, and because cryptocurrency transactions are difficult to reverse once completed, victims typically have little recourse once they realize the platform and the online relationship were both fabricated.

That dynamic fits into a much larger pattern of scam losses. A separate FTC analysis of social-media-originated fraud found that investment scams that began on social media accounted for the largest share of reported social media fraud losses, and that cryptocurrency-related losses across all fraud categories reached into the billions of dollars. The FTC’s data also shows that reported fraud losses among adults 60 and older nearly quadrupled between 2020 and 2024, a trajectory consistent with AARP’s finding that financial-grooming schemes have become a persistent and growing threat rather than a temporary spike.

Why So Few Victims Report the Loss

One of the more troubling findings in AARP’s survey is how rarely victims come forward. More than half of adults who reported losing money to one of these schemes said they never reported it to anyone, and among those who did report the loss, only about a quarter contacted law enforcement and a similar share notified their bank or credit union. Fraud researchers generally attribute the underreporting to embarrassment, since victims often blame themselves for trusting an online relationship, along with confusion about which agency to contact and a sense that the money is unlikely to be recovered regardless of who is notified.

That underreporting has practical consequences beyond the individual victim, since investigators rely heavily on reported cases to identify active scam networks, freeze accounts, and warn other potential targets before they lose money. Every unreported case represents a missed opportunity to build the kind of pattern recognition that helps banks and platforms flag similar schemes earlier.

The Age Gap That Surprised Researchers

One of the more counterintuitive findings in the survey is that adults in the 50-to-64 age range report facing these solicitations at more than double the rate of those 65 and older. Fraud researchers offer a few possible explanations for that gap. Adults in their fifties and early sixties are often more active on mainstream dating apps and social platforms than the oldest cohort of seniors, giving scammers a larger pool of active accounts to target within that age band. Many are also still working, raising families, or managing significant retirement savings, which can make them attractive targets for a scheme built around a gradual, months-long financial ask rather than a single urgent request.

That age distribution complicates the common assumption that romance and investment scams primarily prey on the most isolated, oldest seniors, and fraud prevention groups have begun adjusting their outreach accordingly, targeting financial literacy and scam-awareness campaigns at adults approaching retirement rather than focusing exclusively on programming aimed at the oldest segment of the older-adult population.

What Families Are Being Advised to Watch For

Fraud prevention groups recommend treating any online relationship that shifts toward investment advice, particularly cryptocurrency, as an immediate warning sign, regardless of how genuine the emotional connection feels. Refusing to move money to any platform introduced by an online romantic partner, verifying a partner’s identity through a video call and reverse image search of their photos, and talking openly with older family members about the existence of these schemes are among the most commonly cited protective steps. Because the scripts are built specifically to bypass rational skepticism through emotional investment, experts say the most effective safeguard is often a trusted second opinion from someone outside the relationship before any money changes hands.

Morning Overview produced this article with AI assistance and reviewed it against the cited sources.

More from Morning Overview