Buyers shopping for a new SUV in early 2026 face average transaction prices that remain near record highs, making the question of which models lose the least money over time more consequential than ever. A dataset covering more than 3 million vehicles and nearly 950,000 five-year-old used cars sold between March 2025 and February 2026 puts Toyota at the top of the SUV resale chart, with three models each retaining more than 74 percent of their original sticker price. Separate projected-value awards from Kelley Blue Book reinforce the same pattern, naming the Toyota 4Runner and other SUVs among the strongest bets for long-term value retention.
Why SUV resale strength carries real financial weight right now
A five-year-old SUV that holds 75 percent of its purchase price returns thousands of dollars more at trade-in than one that follows the segment average. For a buyer who financed $45,000, the gap between a top-retaining model and a typical depreciator can exceed $8,000 to $10,000 in equity when it is time to sell or trade. That spread matters more when monthly payments are already stretched by elevated interest rates and sticker prices that have barely retreated from pandemic-era peaks.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics adjusts its Consumer Price Index for used cars and trucks by accounting for depreciation and quality changes, relying on manufacturer cost data for those adjustments. That methodology confirms depreciation is not uniform across models. Some vehicles shed value far faster than others, and the official price index reflects those differences at a structural level. When independent analysts rank individual SUVs by retained value, they are measuring the same phenomenon the federal government tracks in aggregate.
One hypothesis worth watching is that Toyota SUVs offering hybrid powertrains may post even higher five-year retention rates in the next round of data, because fuel-cost sensitivity has become a buying factor that rivals brand loyalty. If gasoline prices stay volatile, hybrid-equipped RAV4s and Grand Highlanders could widen their resale advantage over gas-only competitors. That theory has not been confirmed by the current dataset, but the conditions that would support it are already visible in buyer demand patterns and in the premiums some used buyers are willing to pay for efficient SUVs.
Five Toyota models and the data behind their resale dominance
The strongest evidence comes from an iSeeCars analysis of over 950,000 five-year-old used cars sold from March 2025 through February 2026. Among SUVs, the Toyota C-HR leads with a 75.6 percent five-year resale value. The Toyota RAV4 follows at 75.0 percent, and the Toyota 4Runner sits at 74.6 percent. Two larger Toyota models also appear on the list: the Grand Highlander at 69.6 percent and the Land Cruiser at 68.9 percent.
Those rankings align with a separate set of model-by-model results in the firm’s dedicated SUV resale tables, which compare retained value across mainstream and premium nameplates. In that breakdown, Toyota’s compact and midsize entries consistently land near the top, outpacing many rivals that are newer to the crossover boom. The consistency across several size classes suggests Toyota’s advantage is not just a single hit model but a pattern that spans the brand’s SUV portfolio.
The numbers gain additional weight from Kelley Blue Book’s 2025 Best Resale Value Awards, which are based on projected retained value through the initial five-year ownership period. The company’s award announcement highlights the Toyota 4Runner, the Honda CR-V, and the Toyota RAV4 among the top performers, confirming that two separate analytical approaches, one backward-looking and one forward-looking, reach the same conclusion about which SUVs hold their value best.
The seven SUVs that stand out across both datasets are the Toyota C-HR, RAV4, 4Runner, Grand Highlander, and Land Cruiser, along with the Honda CR-V and additional models that appear in the KBB top-ten rankings. Toyota’s dominance is not a single-model story. Five of the seven strongest resale performers carry the same badge, which points to brand-wide factors like parts availability, perceived reliability, and deep dealer networks that keep used-market demand high.
For buyers weighing a purchase decision right now, the practical takeaway is direct. Choosing a C-HR or RAV4 over a competitor with average depreciation means the owner starts with a built-in equity cushion. If life circumstances change and the vehicle needs to be sold in three to five years, the owner recovers a significantly larger share of the original price. That difference can fund a down payment on the next vehicle or simply reduce the total cost of ownership by thousands of dollars.
Gaps in the resale data and what to track next
The iSeeCars and KBB analyses are the most widely cited sources for model-level resale rankings, but neither organization publishes the raw transaction records or projection formulas behind its numbers. Buyers cannot independently verify whether the 75.6 percent figure for the C-HR reflects a narrow or wide distribution of sale prices, or whether regional markets skew the national average. A vehicle that holds 75 percent of its value in the Southeast may perform differently in the Pacific Northwest, where drivetrain preferences, weather, and road-salt exposure all influence demand and pricing.
No manufacturer has released a public statement tying specific engineering or quality-control decisions to the exact retention percentages reported in these studies. Automakers routinely emphasize durability and low ownership costs in marketing, but they stop short of claiming that a particular suspension design or battery pack chemistry will guarantee a certain resale outcome. That leaves analysts inferring causes from correlations: brands with long-standing reputations for reliability and relatively conservative refresh cycles tend to post stronger used values, but the studies themselves do not prove which design choices matter most.
There are also timing gaps. The iSeeCars study looks at vehicles that are five years old today, which means many of them were engineered before the latest wave of driver-assistance systems and connected-car features became standard. Likewise, Kelley Blue Book’s projections are rooted in historical patterns that may or may not hold as software updates, subscription features, and rapid changes in battery technology reshape what used buyers are willing to pay. A model that ages gracefully in terms of hardware could still be penalized if its infotainment system or app connectivity feels outdated in 2030.
For shoppers, the most useful response is to treat these resale rankings as one input among several. The data clearly show that certain SUVs, particularly from Toyota, have delivered superior value retention over the last five years and are expected to continue doing so. At the same time, individual circumstances-annual mileage, climate, maintenance habits, and whether the vehicle is leased or financed-can narrow or widen the advantage the charts suggest.
Looking ahead, three factors are worth tracking. First, how quickly hybrid and plug-in hybrid SUVs build a resale track record that either confirms or challenges today’s expectations about fuel-efficient models. Second, whether software-driven features and over-the-air updates help some brands keep older vehicles feeling current, supporting stronger used prices. And third, how regional demand shifts-such as growing interest in smaller crossovers in urban markets or rugged body-on-frame SUVs in outdoor-oriented regions-reshape which specific models command the highest bids.
Until more granular data is available, the existing evidence still offers a clear, actionable signal. In a market where new SUVs are expensive and financing costs remain elevated, choosing a model with proven or widely projected resale strength is one of the few levers buyers can pull to contain their long-term costs. For many shoppers in 2026, that means giving Toyota’s SUV lineup, along with a handful of high-retention competitors, an especially close look before signing on the dotted line.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
