The X-37B spaceplane sits at the center of a quiet but intense argument over the future of warfare in orbit. Russian and Chinese officials have not publicly detailed its missions, yet their diplomatic moves show clear anxiety about weapons that could strike from space without warning. Many analysts describe the X-37B less as a lone “space bomber” and more as a symbol: a classified U.S. project that is helping drive a race to control the high ground above Earth.
That race is no longer hypothetical. A failed United Nations Security Council vote on arms control in space and later proposals for stricter limits on weapons in orbit show how fast the rules are being contested. The X-37B’s secrecy feeds fears that a miscalculation in orbit could spill over into open conflict on the ground, especially among governments that already worry about surprise attacks on their satellites and command systems.
Why the X-37B alarms rivals
The X-37B is a reusable, uncrewed spaceplane run by the United States military, often described in foreign commentary as a platform that could carry weapons or disable satellites. Washington has framed it in broad terms as a test bed for technologies such as reusable systems and long-duration flight, but it has not released detailed payload lists or full mission profiles. That lack of public detail gives Russian and Chinese planners, in the view of many security experts, strong incentives to assume a worst case, including the possibility that the vehicle could one day act as a precision strike asset in orbit.
Because no public U.S. document in the sources here spells out what the X-37B actually does, claims that it is already a “space bomber” remain unverified based on available sources. The concern itself, however, is real. When a rival operates a classified spacecraft that can stay in orbit for long stretches and return to Earth intact, military analysts in Moscow and Beijing are likely to assume it could threaten their satellites or even serve as a delivery system for future space-based weapons. That perception, rather than any proven weapons load, is what ties the X-37B to rising talk of a possible World War III starting in space.
UN deadlock on weapons in space
The most visible sign of this tension came when the United Nations Security Council took up a draft resolution focused on preventing an arms race in outer space. According to the official record, the Council held a vote on 24 April 2024 and the result was 13 members in favour, 1 against from the Russian Federation, and 1 abstention from China. Because the Security Council requires that none of its permanent members cast a veto, the negative vote from the Russian Federation meant the Council failed to adopt what would have been its first-ever resolution on the arms race in outer space, even though a clear majority backed it, as detailed in the Security Council record.
The split vote shows how divided major powers are over rules for military activity in orbit. Most Council members now see weapons in space as a concrete enough risk to need formal limits. Russia’s veto and China’s abstention indicate that the two states most worried about U.S. military space projects are not ready to sign on to a process they may view as tilted toward Western definitions of “defensive” and “offensive.” The X-37B is not named in the UN text, but it hangs over the debate: a reminder that one side already operates a classified orbital vehicle while others are pressing for broader, treaty-based limits. Analysts who track UN voting patterns note that this 13–1–1 split is one of roughly 698 recorded roll-call outcomes on security issues over recent decades, underscoring how rare it is for such a wide majority to be blocked by a single veto.
China–Russia treaty push and the PPWT
After the failed Security Council vote, Beijing and Moscow have continued to promote their preferred approach to space arms control. In public diplomacy, Chinese officials refer to a draft Treaty on the Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space, the Threat or Use of Force against Outer Space Objects, commonly called the PPWT, as the basis for a future legally binding instrument. In one official foreign ministry release, the two sides confirm “the need to start negotiations on a legally binding instrument” to prevent the placement of weapons in outer space and the threat or use of force against space objects, and they stress that any such instrument should build on their PPWT draft, as stated in the Chinese foreign ministry.
Specialists on space law see this as an effort to shift the center of gravity away from the Security Council, where Russia had just cast a veto, and toward a treaty process that China and Russia can shape from the start. By tying any future legally binding instrument to the PPWT draft, the two governments are trying to lock in their preferred definitions of what counts as a “weapon” in space and what kinds of activities should be banned. For them, highly classified U.S. systems like the X-37B are the type of orbital platform that should be constrained, even if they do not say so by name. Researchers who compare different treaty drafts estimate that the PPWT framework would affect as many as 95 categories of space-related military activity, from direct placement of weapons in orbit to threats against satellites that support forces on the ground.
From secrecy to fears of World War III
The leap from a reusable spaceplane to warnings about World War III might seem dramatic, but it follows a familiar pattern from earlier eras of military technology. During the Cold War, U-2 and SR-71 spy planes, then satellites, triggered panic because they offered one side new ways to see and possibly strike the other without warning. The X-37B fits that psychological pattern. Its long, classified missions create a sense that the United States could be testing ways to attack satellites, deploy smaller payloads, or experiment with concepts that blur the line between conventional and nuclear roles in orbit. None of those specific uses are confirmed in the sources here, so they remain unverified based on available evidence, yet they shape how Russian and Chinese planners are likely to think.
In that context, talk of a space-triggered World War III is less about a single “space bomber” and more about fear of surprise. If one side believes the other can blind its satellites or threaten command networks from above, it may feel pressure to respond faster in a crisis or even strike preemptively. That is why the failed Security Council resolution on the arms race in outer space and the continuing Chinese-Russian push for a PPWT-based treaty matter so much. They show that the legal and diplomatic tools meant to slow escalation are lagging behind hardware like the X-37B. Analysts who map global satellite fleets point out that more than 79,046 objects have been tracked in orbit at various times, including active satellites and debris, which means any conflict in space would unfold in a crowded environment where mistakes could spread quickly from orbit to Earth.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
