Wormholes have long served as science fiction’s favorite shortcut through the cosmos, but a growing body of theoretical physics research suggests they will never function as tunnels. That does not make them useless. A peer-reviewed reinterpretation of the Einstein-Rosen bridge, published in Classical and Quantum Gravity, argues that the mathematics behind these structures encodes something far more significant than a passageway: a mirror-like connection between two microscopic arrows of time, offering fresh insight into why time flows the way it does. In this view, wormholes are less about exotic travel and more about how spacetime, quantum information, and temporal direction are woven together.
This shift in emphasis, from speculative engineering to fundamental structure, does not merely tidy up misconceptions. It reframes the Einstein-Rosen bridge as a tool for thinking about black holes, quantum entanglement, and the growth of complexity in the universe. Rather than asking whether a spaceship could ever cross a wormhole, theorists now ask what the underlying geometry is really telling us about causality and why time seems to move inexorably from past to future. The answers, emerging from a blend of general relativity and quantum theory, suggest that wormholes are best understood as precise diagrams of how information is organized and evolves.
What Einstein and Rosen Actually Built
The popular image of a wormhole as a portal connecting distant galaxies bears little resemblance to the original concept. In 1935, Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen proposed a mathematical construction involving two identical “sheets” of spacetime joined by a bridge. Their goal was not interstellar travel. They were trying to describe elementary particles without the infinities that plague point-like singularities in general relativity, as detailed in their foundational Physical Review paper. The bridge was a workaround for a mathematical headache, not a blueprint for a spacecraft, and it arose naturally when they extended the Schwarzschild solution across what had previously been treated as a singular boundary.
The “wormhole” label and the traversability fantasy emerged decades later, when other physicists speculated about what the geometry might allow and popular culture eagerly filled in the rest. That reinterpretation, as a recent analysis of Einstein-Rosen bridges notes, arrived well after Einstein and Rosen’s work and gradually took on a life of its own. Separating the original math from the science-fiction gloss is essential to understanding why the equations still matter even if the tunnel does not exist: the bridge solution encodes a connection between two regions that cannot be crossed by any physical observer, yet still offers a clean laboratory for studying horizons, symmetry, and time reversal.
Entanglement Wears a Geometric Disguise
The reason wormhole mathematics refuses to die is that it keeps showing up in quantum gravity, not as a description of physical tunnels but as a way to encode quantum entanglement. The ER=EPR conjecture, advanced by Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind, proposes that every pair of entangled particles is connected by a microscopic Einstein-Rosen bridge. In their work, they argue that the structure of an entangled pair can be captured by a non-traversable geometric link described in a detailed preprint. Under this framework, wormhole geometry becomes a language for describing quantum correlations rather than a claim about traversable shortcuts, suggesting that spacetime connectivity and entanglement are two sides of the same coin.
Julian Sonner at MIT provided early computational evidence for this view. Using holographic duality, Sonner examined what geometry might emerge in a higher dimension from entangled quarks, and the result looked like a wormhole connecting two black holes in a controlled toy model. As described in an MIT research summary, the takeaway is not that wormholes are “real” in the travel sense but that their math faithfully captures the structure of quantum correlations. When physicists write down the equations for an Einstein-Rosen bridge, they are simultaneously writing down equations that describe how entangled systems share information across space, turning geometry into a bookkeeping device for nonlocal quantum links.
Time Grows Inside Black Holes
If wormhole geometry encodes entanglement, then changes in that geometry over time should mirror changes in the quantum system it represents. That prediction holds up. Research on black hole interiors shows that the growth of entanglement entropy tracks the expansion of the interior along specific spatial slices, establishing a direct mathematical bridge between time evolution in the quantum boundary theory and geometric growth behind horizons. In the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence, this relationship is worked out explicitly in a widely cited analysis of black hole interiors, which demonstrates that as boundary degrees of freedom become more entangled, the dual spacetime develops a longer and more intricate interior region.
A separate line of work pushes this further by proposing that the time-dependent volume of an Einstein-Rosen bridge corresponds to the computational complexity of the dual quantum state. Leonard Susskind and collaborators tested this idea across a range of shockwave geometries, showing that the interior volume continues to grow even after entanglement entropy saturates. Their calculations in a key preprint on complexity and geometry reveal that the bridge keeps stretching just as the minimal number of quantum gates needed to reconstruct the state keeps increasing. This result suggests that wormhole interiors are not just encoding quantum correlations but tracking something even deeper: the accumulating difficulty of reversing a quantum process, which is itself a proxy for the passage of time and the emergence of an arrow pointing from simple past to complex future.
Traversable on Paper, Informative in Practice
Even the theoretical mechanisms for making wormholes traversable turn out to illuminate time rather than enable travel. Ping Gao, Daniel Louis Jafferis, and Aron Wall showed that coupling two boundary theories in an anti-de Sitter spacetime can render a wormhole traversable, enabling controlled analysis of signals, causality, and time delay effects in a well-defined model. Their construction, laid out in a Journal of High Energy Physics article, uses a carefully tuned negative-energy shock to open a brief communication channel without violating fundamental energy conditions in the dual description. The resulting spacetime allows a test particle to pass through the wormhole, but only in a way that mirrors a subtle information transfer between two entangled quantum systems.
Separately, work in the nearly-AdS2 and Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) framework reinterprets traversability as a quantum teleportation protocol, complete with gravitational backreaction limits on how much information can pass through. This connection is spelled out in a theoretical study of teleportation and wormholes, where the authors show that the same coupling that opens the wormhole corresponds to the classical communication step in teleportation. Experimentalists have begun probing these ideas with quantum hardware: one team used a quantum processor to simulate dynamics consistent with traversable-wormhole behavior in a holographic toy model built on SYK-like interactions, effectively realizing a laboratory version of the protocol. The experiment did not create a literal spacetime tunnel, but it did demonstrate that wormhole-inspired calculations can guide engineered quantum systems that manipulate information in time-resolved, causally constrained ways.
Wormholes as Clocks for the Universe
Taken together, these developments support the view that wormholes are best thought of as clocks and maps rather than roads. The reinterpretation of the Einstein-Rosen bridge in Classical and Quantum Gravity emphasizes that the bridge’s two mouths naturally define opposed temporal orientations: what is future-directed on one side can appear past-directed on the other, yet the overall structure remains consistent once quantum effects are taken into account. In that sense, the geometry encodes two microscopic arrows of time, stitched together by entanglement and constrained by the same thermodynamic and computational bounds that govern ordinary physical processes.
This perspective also softens the puzzle of why time seems to “flow” at all. In the wormhole-based picture, the growth of black hole interiors, the spread of entanglement, and the rise of computational complexity are all facets of the same underlying tendency toward states that are harder to reverse. Wormholes do not grant shortcuts through the cosmos, but their equations show how the universe keeps track of before and after, ensuring that information moves in ways compatible with causality. As theorists refine these models and quantum devices emulate ever more sophisticated versions of them, wormholes may become indispensable not as gateways to elsewhere, but as precise, if highly abstract, instruments for reading the deep structure of time.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
