The guardrail that was supposed to keep the climate crisis in check is now directly ahead of us. With global temperatures already brushing against the 1.5°C mark and current policies still pointing toward higher heating, the world is on course to overshoot the Paris Agreement’s most ambitious target before 2030. The question is no longer whether the threshold will be tested, but how societies respond as it is crossed and what that means for the most vulnerable people on the planet.
Scientists and policymakers have warned for years that 1.5°C is not a political slogan but a physical limit tied to real-world damage. As the gap between promises and action persists, the race is shifting from avoiding that line entirely to limiting how far and how long we go beyond it, and to deciding who will bear the brunt of the overshoot.
From distant warning to imminent overshoot
The idea that the world might soon pass 1.5°C of warming was once framed as a worst-case scenario, but it has now become the central forecast. Modeling from UNEP’s Emissions Gap work shows that, under current trajectories, the planet is likely to exceed the temperature level that was meant to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In 2024, the average temperature of Earth was already reported to be about 1.5°C warmer than in pre-industrial times, a symbolic crossing that underscores how little room is left before the long-term climate baseline follows.
That shift from possibility to probability is not just a matter of decimal points. The Paris Agreement’s upper ambition was designed around the understanding that every fraction of a degree increases the likelihood of extreme heat, heavier rainfall, and sea level rise that can overwhelm infrastructure and ecosystems. As the gap between pledged emissions cuts and actual implementation persists, the world is effectively betting on future technologies and policy reversals to pull temperatures back down after an overshoot, rather than preventing that overshoot in the first place.
What 1.5-degree means for people, not just charts
For communities already living on the edge of climate impacts, the breach of the 1.5-degree threshold is not an abstract policy failure. As one assessment put it, Passing the 1.5-degree threshold is not a symbolic failure, for people in low- and middle-income countries it would represent a material escalation of risk to lives, livelihoods, and basic services. Heatwaves that were once rare become regular, crop yields become less reliable, and coastal flooding that used to be a once-in-a-lifetime disaster can arrive several times within a generation.
These impacts are layered on top of existing inequalities. Many of the countries most exposed to rising seas, stronger storms, and shifting rainfall patterns have contributed the least to historical emissions and have the fewest resources to adapt. When the global average temperature climbs, it is not the global average citizen who suffers first, but farmers in delta regions, residents of informal settlements on floodplains, and workers in outdoor jobs who cannot escape the heat. The 1.5-degree line, in other words, is a proxy for a widening gap between those who can buffer themselves from climate shocks and those who cannot.
What science says about 1.5 °C and 2 °C
Climate science has been clear that the difference between 1.5 °C and 2 °C of warming is measured in lives and livelihoods, not just in graphs. The Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C, prepared by The Special Report team under the Intergovernmental scientific process, concluded that meeting the Paris target of limiting warming to 1.5 °C would significantly reduce risks compared with a world where temperature rise reaches 2 °C. That includes lower probabilities of ice sheet instability, fewer species pushed to extinction, and less severe impacts on food security.
The report’s message was blunt: every tenth of a degree matters. At around 2 °C, coral reefs are projected to decline by more than 99 percent, compared with a still-devastating but smaller loss at 1.5 °C. Heat extremes that are already testing the limits of human endurance in cities from Karachi to Phoenix become more frequent and intense. The science does not offer a safe harbor at 1.5 °C, but it does show that the climb from there to 2 °C would push many systems beyond their ability to adapt, locking in changes that would last for centuries.
Recent temperature records and the shrinking carbon budget
Recent years have shown how quickly the climate system can move into uncharted territory. A review of Nevertheless record-breaking global temperatures highlighted that the planet is being pushed ever closer to agreed limits, with widespread risks escalating as each new record falls. Heatwaves have scorched regions from southern Europe to North America, while marine heat events have stressed fisheries and coral systems that millions of people depend on for food and income.
Those records are not isolated anomalies, they are part of a pattern in which the average temperature over the last three years has already Averagely surpassed the 1.5C threshold according to Coperni analyses. That means the remaining carbon budget compatible with keeping long-term warming near 1.5 °C is vanishing quickly. Each additional year of high emissions locks in more heating, making it harder to stabilize temperatures later even with aggressive cuts, and increasing the likelihood that the world will spend decades above the target before any chance of returning below it.
Politics, responsibility, and the race to respond
The political response to this looming overshoot has been uneven, but the scientific warnings have grown sharper. At a major UN climate gathering in Brazil, Secretary–General Antonio Guterres described the latest assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as a litany of broken climate promises, warning that without rapid course correction the consequences will be severe. His remarks, delivered in Nov at a moment of record heat and intensifying disasters, underscored how far current national commitments still fall short of what the science demands.
Under the terms of the Paris Agreement, countries agreed to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5 °C, yet current trajectories show that this level could be breached by 2030, as highlighted in Science and related analyses that track temperatures already more than 1.1 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial times. The political challenge now is twofold: to accelerate emissions cuts fast enough to limit how far beyond 1.5 °C the world goes, and to scale up finance and support so that low- and middle-income countries are not left to face the fallout alone. That means rethinking everything from fossil fuel subsidies to the pace of investment in renewable energy like wind and solar, and doing so in a timeframe measured in a few short years rather than decades.
More from Morning Overview