A team of physicists has proposed that the Big Bang did not mark the absolute beginning of everything but instead occurred inside a collapsing black hole, meaning our entire universe may exist within the event horizon of a larger parent cosmos. The proposal, built on quantum mechanics that most physicists already accept, arrives alongside a separate but related line of research stretching back decades, and together they are forcing a serious reexamination of what “the beginning” actually means.
Quantum Exclusion as a Cosmic Safety Net
The central claim comes from a model that treats gravitational collapse not as a one-way trip to infinite density but as a process that hits a wall and reverses. In a peer-reviewed paper published in Physical Review D, researchers describe how the Pauli exclusion principle, the rule that prevents two identical fermions from occupying the same quantum state, generates enough outward pressure during collapse to halt the crunch. Instead of forming a singularity, the matter bounces. That bounce, the authors argue, can ignite expansion within the confines of a Schwarzschild radius, effectively birthing a new universe that remains trapped behind an event horizon and would be invisible to any external observers.
The accompanying analysis on arXiv lays out the mathematics of this scenario using fully relativistic spherical collapse with an evolving equation of state driven by fermionic matter. The paper derives a specific bounce radius, the point at which contraction reverses into expansion, and tracks how densities and pressures evolve through that turnaround. What makes the model provocative is its modesty: it does not invoke exotic new particles or speculative extra dimensions, relying instead on standard quantum statistics and general relativity. The authors have emphasized in a public-facing essay that their framework is “grounded entirely in known physics and observations,” positioning the bounce not as a fantasy but as a conservative extrapolation of already tested principles into an extreme regime.
Half a Century of Universes Inside Black Holes
The idea that our cosmos might be a black hole is far older than the latest exclusion-based model. In 1972, physicist R.K. Pathria published a short but influential argument in Nature contending that a closed universe satisfying certain relativistic and cosmological conditions would be observationally indistinguishable from a black hole. Pathria’s reasoning was straightforward: if the total mass-energy of the universe lies within its own Schwarzschild radius, then from the outside it would look like a black hole, even though inhabitants on the inside would see ordinary cosmic expansion. That early work did not specify what happens at the putative singularity, but it planted the seed that “universe” and “black hole interior” might be two descriptions of the same underlying geometry.
By the late 1980s, theorists were filling in the physics of what could happen deep inside a collapsing star once classical general relativity is pushed to its limits. A 1989 article in Physics Letters B explored how a Schwarzschild geometry could transition into a de Sitter region, the mathematical description of an exponentially expanding vacuum, inside a black hole if spacetime curvature hits a maximum value. A year later, a team led by Frolov, Markov, and Mukhanov showed in Physical Review D that under a limiting-curvature assumption a black hole interior can avoid a singularity altogether and instead inflate into a closed world. These studies, published in mainstream journals, established that once quantum-gravity-inspired cutoffs are imposed, the classical picture of an inescapable singularity gives way to a richer menu of possibilities that already resembled baby universes budding off from parent spacetimes.
Torsion, Spin, and an Alternative Bounce
Running parallel to the exclusion-principle approach is a distinct program led by Nikodem Poplawski, a physicist whose work focuses on gravity, cosmology, and the microstructure of spacetime. Poplawski operates within the Einstein-Cartan framework, a well-established extension of general relativity that allows spacetime to possess torsion in addition to curvature. In this picture, the intrinsic spin of fermions couples to torsion, and at extremely high densities that coupling generates an effective repulsive force. Inside a collapsing stellar core that would classically form a black hole, this spin-torsion repulsion can become strong enough to prevent a singularity and instead drive a bounce, turning a terminal collapse into the birth of a new expanding region.
Poplawski’s detailed treatment of this scenario was published in The Astrophysical Journal, where he modeled how torsion and quantum particle production in the black hole interior can combine to produce a closed universe that smoothly emerges from the bounce. In that work, the newborn cosmos inherits its initial conditions from the collapsing parent star but rapidly inflates and becomes causally disconnected from the exterior. A subsequent technical update on arXiv incorporates tools such as the Tolman metric, analyzes the competition between shear and torsion, and explores oscillatory cycles in which a universe can undergo repeated contractions and expansions. Poplawski’s earlier conceptual proposal, presented in an earlier preprint, remains the clearest nontechnical statement of how spin–torsion effects could replace the classical Big Bang singularity with a bounce inside a black hole.
Two Mechanisms, One Radical Conclusion
Despite their different technical underpinnings, the exclusion-principle bounce and the torsion-driven bounce converge on a strikingly similar narrative: black holes may be cosmic wombs rather than dead ends. In the fermionic-exclusion model, quantum statistics provide the pressure needed to reverse collapse before a singularity forms, causing the interior to re-expand as a self-contained universe hidden behind an event horizon. In the Einstein–Cartan scenario, the microscopic spin of matter sources torsion, which becomes repulsive at extreme densities and similarly prevents infinite compression, again turning the interior into a new expanding cosmos. In both cases, what an external observer perceives as a black hole could, from the inside, be an entire universe with its own history, matter content, and possibly its own black holes giving rise to further generations.
This shared conclusion has far-reaching implications for how cosmologists think about origins and endings. If black holes routinely spawn new universes, then the Big Bang of our own cosmos might not have been an absolute beginning but a transitional event in a much larger multigenerational structure. Parameters we now treat as fundamental (such as particle masses or cosmological constants) could, in principle, be statistical outcomes of a cosmic evolutionary process, with universes that are more efficient at producing black holes giving rise to more offspring. While these ideas remain speculative and face serious challenges in connecting to direct observations, they are anchored in peer-reviewed work that modifies gravity and quantum theory in conservative ways rather than discarding them. Together, they push the frontier of cosmology from asking what happened “before” the Big Bang to asking which deeper structures might make Big Bangs commonplace.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
