New York’s new mayor, Zohran Mamdani, managed to turn a routine security notice into a global tech argument when his team added Raspberry Pi computers to the banned items list for his NYC swearing-in. Instead of just flagging weapons and explosives, the inauguration rules singled out hobbyist boards and hacking gadgets, casting a spotlight on how political leaders understand, and sometimes misunderstand, modern digital threats. The decision raised a sharper question than the list itself: what does it say about how City Hall plans to govern technology in public life?
At first glance, the prohibition looked like a niche detail buried in event logistics, but it quickly became a proxy battle over security theater, civil liberties, and the future of open hardware in New York. By treating Raspberry Pi devices like contraband, Zohran Mamdani signaled that he sees small, programmable boards as a meaningful risk in a crowded civic ceremony, not just toys for coders and kids. I want to unpack why he did it, what the security logic looks like, and why the backlash from engineers and educators has been so fierce.
The unusual ban that lit up the tech world
The starting point is simple: the official rules for the 2026 New York City mayoral inauguration of Zohran Mamdani explicitly barred Raspberry Pi computers from the venue. The same list also blocked other niche electronics, including the Flipper Zero, grouping them alongside more familiar contraband like weapons and illegal substances. That choice to name Raspberry Pi on its own, rather than hiding it inside a generic “no electronic devices” clause, is what turned a local security memo into a global talking point.
Reporting on the event notes that the organisers treated Raspberry Pi boards as tools for “electronic mischief,” including potential signal jamming and other interference with the ceremony’s infrastructure. One account describes how the socialist Mayor-elect of New York was presented as taking a hard line on small boards, with the Raspberry Pi singled out as a risk at the mayor’s party and inauguration events, a framing echoed in coverage that highlighted the Raspberry Pi ban as a symbol of his team’s caution around DIY hardware.
What Mamdani’s team says it is afraid of
To understand why Raspberry Pi ended up on that list, it helps to look at how Zohran Mamdani’s camp framed the threat. Security planners argued that compact, programmable devices can be used to disrupt wireless networks, spoof signals, or quietly run attack scripts in a way that is hard for frontline staff to detect. In their view, a pocketable board with exposed pins and a Linux install is not just a toy, it is a Swiss Army knife for mischief in a tightly controlled environment.
One detailed breakdown of the inauguration rules notes that the banned items list did not stop at Raspberry Pi, but also named the Flipper Zero and similar “Devices” that can interact with radio, NFC, and other protocols. The same reporting explains that governments have already raised concerns about how Flipper Zero can be used to probe access systems and wireless infrastructure, and that the New York City team saw these gadgets as part of a broader class of portable hacking tools, a view that is spelled out in coverage of how Devices such as the Flipper Zero have drawn official scrutiny.
Why Raspberry Pi ended up in the same bucket as weapons
The most provocative detail in the backlash was not just that Raspberry Pi was banned, but that it appeared on a list alongside illegal substances, explosives, and firearms. Critics seized on that juxtaposition as evidence that Zohran Mamdani’s team did not understand the difference between a low-cost teaching computer and a weapon. The optics of treating a credit card sized board like a bomb were always going to be combustible in a city with a large maker and startup community.
One widely shared commentary quoted the line that “According to Zohran Mamdani, these things belong to the same category: illegal substances, weapons, explosives, and Raspberry Pi,” using that phrasing to argue that the list was “absurd” and out of step with how technologists see the device. That critique framed the policy as a joke that had somehow become real, pointing to the way the New York mayor-elect’s own inauguration rules lumped Raspberry Pi into a category of dangerous contraband, a point captured in coverage of how According to Zohran Mamdani the device sat alongside explosives on the prohibited list.
Security theater or sensible risk reduction?
From a security perspective, the core question is whether banning Raspberry Pi boards at a single event meaningfully reduces risk, or whether it is mostly symbolic. Some cybersecurity professionals argue that removing plug and play hacking gadgets from a crowded, high profile ceremony does at least shrink the “threat vector” from opportunistic attackers. In that view, if you make it harder for inexperienced “script kiddies” to walk in with a preconfigured board and run canned exploits, you have already made the job of the security team easier.
That argument appears in online discussions where practitioners note that such bans “reduce the threat vector of script kiddies specifically,” because tools like Flipper Zero and preloaded Raspberry Pi kits let people with “no prior knowledge” launch attacks that would otherwise require real expertise. One thread about the inauguration rules makes exactly this point, defending the policy as a way to keep low skill attackers from casually probing radio systems or access controls, a position reflected in comments that the ban reduces the threat vector for people who might otherwise use off the shelf gadgets without understanding them.
The critics: “security people who do not understand computers”
On the other side, engineers and hobbyists have been scathing about the decision, arguing that it confuses visible hardware with actual capability. Raspberry Pi boards are general purpose computers, and critics point out that if the concern is malware or network disruption, then smartphones and laptops are far more common and powerful tools. To them, singling out a green circuit board with GPIO pins while allowing thousands of iPhones through the gates looks less like risk management and more like fear of things that “look hacky.”
One detailed critique of the inauguration rules mocked the idea that banning Raspberry Pi would meaningfully improve safety, noting that if the real worry is bootloader access or custom firmware, then officials would “Also need to ban any Android phone models which can unlock the bootloader.” The same discussion described the policy as evidence of “security people who do not understand computers,” arguing that Raspberry Pis are not a unique threat and that the ban mainly highlights the absurdity of focusing on boards with visible wires while ignoring far more capable devices, a sentiment captured in comments that Also need to ban any Android phones if the logic is applied consistently.
How the ban landed with cybersecurity professionals
Within the security community, reaction has been more mixed than the loudest social media posts suggest. Some practitioners see the inauguration rules as classic “security theater,” a visible gesture that reassures the public without addressing deeper vulnerabilities. Others, especially those who have worked on large event security, argue that even imperfect restrictions can be justified if they simplify screening and reduce the number of unknowns in a high stress environment.
One cybersecurity forum thread about the New York inauguration described the policy as “interesting” security theater, with participants debating whether banning Flipper Zero and Raspberry Pi reflected a genuine understanding of the tools or a knee jerk response to their hacker reputation. The original poster framed the list as an example of officials reacting to gadgets they do not fully grasp, while others countered that crowd safety sometimes requires blunt instruments, a debate captured in a discussion that began with someone who Saw the ban as a telling sign of how non technical staff think about hacking tools.
From Flipper Zero to Kali: the broader toolset under suspicion
The inauguration rules did not emerge in a vacuum. Over the past few years, devices like Flipper Zero and software stacks like Kali NetHunter have become shorthand in policy circles for “hacker gear,” even though they are widely used for legitimate security testing. In that context, it is not surprising that Zohran Mamdani’s team grouped Raspberry Pi with Flipper Zero and similar gadgets, treating them as part of a single category of portable offensive tools that can run a wide range of scripts and exploits.
Coverage of the New York City inauguration notes that the banned items list specifically called out Flipper Zero and Raspberry Pi, and linked them to concerns about how such devices can be loaded with security toolsets like Kali NetHunter. The reporting explains that officials see these combinations as powerful, modular platforms for probing networks and radio systems, which is why the 2026 ceremony’s rules targeted them as a class, a rationale laid out in analysis of how New York City treated these devices as potential carriers of a wide range of software.
What the Raspberry Pi community heard in the ban
For educators, hobbyists, and small businesses built around Raspberry Pi, the symbolism of the ban cut deeper than the practical impact on a single event. Raspberry Pi boards are used in New York classrooms, community labs, and startups as cheap, flexible computers for learning and prototyping. When a high profile political event labels them as dangerous, it sends a message about how city leadership perceives the tools that underpin grassroots innovation and STEM education.
One analysis of the inauguration rules noted that the Raspberry Pi appears on the prohibited items list for Zoran Mamdani’s NYC Mayoral Inauguration, and then contrasted that with the board’s role in teaching and experimentation. The same piece argued that while crowd safety is a legitimate concern, blanket bans risk stigmatizing open hardware and discouraging its use in public spaces, a tension highlighted in coverage of the Raspberry Pi Ban at Zoran Mamdani’s NYC Mayoral Inauguration and its implications for how non specialists view the platform.
How tech media framed Mamdani’s decision
Technology outlets quickly picked up on the story, framing it as a clash between political caution and hacker culture. Several reports emphasized that Zohran Mamdani, as New York’s mayor-elect, appeared to focus on Raspberry Pi as a symbol of potential wrongdoing, while seemingly overlooking that smartphones can be used for similar or greater harm. That contrast became a recurring theme in coverage, with commentators suggesting that the ban reflected a partial understanding of the threat landscape.
One detailed report on the inauguration rules argued that Zohran Mamdani “appears not to understand that smartphones can be used for evil,” pointing out that the same capabilities that make Raspberry Pi a flexible tool for experimentation also exist in the phones every attendee would carry. The piece described how the New York mayor-elect’s team saw “obvious potential for miscreants” in small boards, even as they allowed far more ubiquitous devices through, a critique anchored in analysis of how Zohran Mamdani justified the Raspberry Pi ban while leaving smartphones untouched.
Inside the official justification: crowd safety and optics
When I look at the pattern across reports, the official justification for the ban rests on two pillars: crowd safety and optics. On safety, the argument is that a high profile event with dense crowds and live broadcast infrastructure cannot afford unexpected radio interference or network disruption. On optics, the team appears to have wanted to show that it was taking modern cyber risks seriously, even if that meant erring on the side of over inclusion in the banned list.
One analysis of the policy notes that the inauguration organizers understood that crowd safety required limiting the number of unpredictable devices in the venue, and that they preferred to over block rather than risk a visible incident. The same discussion suggests that the team wanted to absorb the political cost of a strict list themselves “so nobody else has to,” implying that they saw the ban as a one off sacrifice to set a precedent for caution, a framing that appears in coverage of how the event’s planners said it understands that crowd safety sometimes demands unpopular restrictions.
What this signals for New York’s tech policy climate
Beyond the inauguration itself, the Raspberry Pi ban offers an early signal of how Zohran Mamdani’s administration might approach technology policy. On one hand, the decision shows a willingness to act aggressively on perceived digital threats, even at the risk of alienating parts of the tech community. On the other, the backlash highlights the cost of making those decisions without deep engagement with practitioners who understand how tools are actually used in the field.
One detailed explainer on the inauguration rules framed the episode as a case study in how cities balance genuine cyber risks with the need to avoid arbitrary restrictions that chill innovation. It argued that while there are real concerns about portable hacking devices, effective policy should distinguish between context specific controls at sensitive events and broader stigmatization of open hardware, a tension that will matter as New York navigates issues from public Wi-Fi to smart infrastructure, a point underscored in analysis of how the NYC Mayoral Inauguration Bans Flipper Zero and Raspberry Pi, What You Need to Know highlights broader implications for tech communities.
Why the controversy is unlikely to fade quickly
Even after the swearing in is over, I do not expect the debate around the Raspberry Pi ban to disappear. For many in the tech world, the episode crystallizes long standing frustrations about how political leaders talk about cybersecurity: quick to invoke “hackers” and “miscreants,” slower to invest in nuanced, evidence based policy. For civil liberties advocates, it raises questions about how far event organizers can go in restricting benign devices in the name of safety, and what that means for future protests, rallies, and public gatherings in New York.
One early analysis of the inauguration rules suggested that the controversy would become a touchstone in discussions about security theater, pointing to the way online communities dissected the list and mocked its inconsistencies. Another report on the ban emphasized that Zohran Mamdani’s decision to block Raspberry Pi devices from his inauguration as New York mayor had already sparked international coverage and heated comment threads, a sign that the story had moved beyond local logistics into a broader cultural argument, as seen in coverage explaining why Zohran Mamdani banned Raspberry Pi devices from his inauguration and how that decision resonated far beyond City Hall.
More from MorningOverview