Some asteroids are quietly speeding up or veering off their predicted paths, yet telescopes see no glowing tails or hazy comas that would mark them as comets. That mystery has turned a once obscure class of objects into a front‑burner puzzle for planetary scientists. A new peer‑reviewed analysis has now boosted the tally of these so‑called dark comets to 14, raising fresh questions about how many hidden icy bodies may be slipping through current surveys.
I want to look at why these objects are so odd, how researchers found seven new candidates in old data, and what their strange behavior might mean for the history of the solar system and for Earth’s long‑term impact risk.
What Are Dark Comets and Why Are They ‘Odd’?
NASA researchers define dark comets as objects that look like ordinary asteroids in images but move as if something besides gravity is tugging on them. In a recent official NASA summary, the agency describes them as asteroid‑like bodies with statistically significant nongravitational accelerations that resemble comet outgassing, yet with no visible dust or gas. That behavior sets them apart from typical asteroids, whose small drifts can usually be explained by the Yarkovsky effect, the subtle push from uneven heating and re‑radiation of sunlight.
The prototype for this class is (523599) 2003 RM, analyzed in depth in a technical study that tracked the object across four separate apparitions in 2003, 2008, 2013 and 2018. Using multi‑epoch optical astrometry, that work detected a statistically significant nongravitational acceleration that did not match what Yarkovsky forces or standard gravitational perturbations should produce. Follow‑up stacked imaging showed no detectable dust tail, which allowed researchers to place strict upper limits on any dust production that might be hiding below the sensitivity of single exposures.
The Breakthrough Discovery: Seven New Candidates
The story changed sharply when a team led by Darryl Seligman combed through archival observations and reported seven additional dark‑comet candidates in a peer‑reviewed paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, citing DOI 10.1073/pnas.2406424121. By fitting orbits that included possible nongravitational terms and then testing those fits against long observational arcs, the researchers showed that these objects also experience accelerations inconsistent with known thermal effects. Their analysis roughly doubled the known population of such bodies to 14, a number that NASA later echoed in its own public briefing on the findings.
To quantify how strange these orbits are, the team drew on the JPL Small‑Body Database, which provides authoritative orbital elements and physical parameters for each candidate. They compared the measured acceleration magnitudes and orbital shapes of the dark comets with those of near‑Earth objects, Jupiter‑family comets and main‑belt asteroids cataloged in the same dataset. According to a Government science‑agency summary, the accelerations fall in a regime that strongly suggests comet‑like outgassing, even though stacked images again failed to reveal any dust features and only allowed upper limits on possible activity.
Two Flavors of Dark Comets: Inner vs. Outer Populations
Once the list of candidates grew, patterns in their orbits and sizes began to emerge. NASA’s official explainer notes that the 14 objects separate into two broad groups: an inner population of kilometer‑scale bodies with orbits linked to the main asteroid belt, and a smaller, outer population with orbits that resemble Jupiter‑family comets. The inner group tends to have semi‑major axes and eccentricities consistent with delivery from the inner main belt, while the outer group follows more elongated, inclined paths typical of short‑period comets.
Those orbital clues line up with dynamical simulations presented in an arXiv modeling paper that argues many dark comets may originate in the ν6 resonance region of the main belt. In that work, researchers used numerical integrations to show that icy bodies from that resonance can be nudged onto near‑Earth trajectories while retaining buried volatiles. The same simulations propose an evolutionary track involving rotational fragmentation cascades, in which spin‑up and breakup gradually expose fresh icy surfaces. The authors caution that fragmentation histories remain uncertain, and they flag that as a major open question for future modeling.
Why This Matters: Rewriting Solar System History
The existence of dark comets hints that the inner solar system may contain more hidden ice than standard models assume. A National Science Foundation overview frames the discovery as a potential shift in how scientists think about volatile delivery to the terrestrial planets. If kilometer‑scale bodies from the ν6 region contain significant frozen material, then the inner main belt may have played a larger role in supplying water and other volatiles to Earth, Mars and Venus than previously credited. That possibility dovetails with NASA statements, cited in its dark‑comet briefing, that there could be a substantial hidden population of icy objects masquerading as inert asteroids.
There is also a more immediate angle: impact risk. Because dark comets look inactive in standard survey images, they are likely cataloged as ordinary asteroids, which means their comet‑like accelerations can quietly shift their paths over time. NASA’s official account notes that understanding these nongravitational forces is essential for reliable long‑term orbit predictions. If similar bodies exist in greater numbers, as suggested by speculative reporting about a possible hidden ring of small objects in the solar system, then current hazard assessments may be missing a piece of the puzzle, even if the present sample size is too small to change risk models on its own.
Adjacent Oddities: The Case of 2024 PT5
The dark‑comet story is not the only recent surprise involving small bodies near Earth. In a separate line of research, NASA scientists analyzed a tiny near‑Earth object designated 2024 PT5, which briefly behaved like a temporary mini‑moon. According to an official NASA report, the object is about 10 meters in diameter, follows an Earth‑like heliocentric orbit and was first detected on Aug. 7, 2024, before subsequent tracking confirmed its unusual path.
What makes 2024 PT5 relevant to the dark‑comet discussion is not that it shows comet‑like acceleration, but that its spectrum appears consistent with lunar rock rather than typical asteroid material, based on the peer‑reviewed analysis of its reflectance. That finding, combined with its Earth‑like orbit, suggests it may be a fragment of the Moon that was ejected long ago and then wandered back into Earth’s neighborhood. The case highlights how even a well‑surveyed region near our planet can still harbor unexpected types of objects, echoing the lesson from dark comets that classification from images alone can be misleading.
What Scientists Do Not Know Yet
For all the excitement, the basic physics driving dark comets is still unsettled. The prototype study of (523599) 2003 RM, published as a deep investigation of nongravitational forces, concludes that outgassing is a plausible explanation for the measured acceleration, but it stops short of proving that gas jets are the only option. The lack of any detected dust in stacked imaging, combined with tight upper limits on dust production, leaves room for alternative ideas such as extremely gas‑rich, dust‑poor sublimation or yet‑unknown surface processes. NASA’s official commentary explicitly stresses that the physical mechanism behind the accelerations is still being worked out.
The origin models are also under active debate. The ν6‑resonance pathway and fragmentation cascades proposed in the simulation study line up well with the inner dark‑comet population, but it is less clear whether the same mechanism can account for the outer, Jupiter‑family‑like group. Earlier dynamical work on small‑body transport, such as the scenarios explored in related orbital simulations, suggests multiple source regions may feed near‑Earth space over time. Researchers quoted in the Government overview argue that resolving these questions will require new observational campaigns, including deeper imaging to search for ultra‑faint activity and long‑baseline tracking to refine acceleration measurements, as well as eventual spacecraft missions that can directly sample or image the surfaces of these odd objects.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
