Electric vehicle owners have been taught to treat 100 percent as a danger zone, a number to avoid in the name of battery health. Yet some Ford Mustang Mach-E and Tesla drivers are now being told to do the opposite and regularly top up to a full charge. The reason is not marketing spin but a shift in battery chemistry and software that makes a blanket “never hit 100” rule outdated for certain packs.
The key change is the spread of lithium iron phosphate, or LFP, batteries in models like the Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range and Tesla’s rear-wheel-drive cars. These packs behave differently from the nickel-based cells that shaped early EV advice, and their management systems sometimes need a full charge to stay calibrated. Understanding why that is, and when to follow the 80 percent habit instead, has become one of the most important pieces of EV literacy.
From “stop at 80%” to a new rule for LFP packs
For years, the default guidance for lithium ion batteries has been to keep daily charging between roughly 20 and 80 percent to limit stress at the top of the pack. That advice still holds for many nickel cobalt manganese (NCM) and similar chemistries, where high voltage at 100 percent accelerates wear. Owners of older EVs internalized this as a hard rule, treating the last 20 percent as an emergency-only buffer rather than part of the usable battery.
LFP cells, which now power some Ford Mustang Mach-E and Tesla variants, change that calculus. These batteries trade some energy density for durability and a flatter voltage curve, which means they can tolerate sitting at a higher state of charge with less degradation than NCM. One Mach-E owner, posting under the name Jun, pointed out that while storing a high voltage battery at very high charge is still less favorable than parking it lower, the chemistry and software in these LFP packs are designed around regular full charges rather than avoiding them at all costs.
Why Ford Mustang Mach-E screens are asking for 100%
Drivers of the latest Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range models have started seeing a surprising message on the central screen, urging them to charge to 100 percent. When one reviewer spent time in a 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E, the car explicitly recommended a full charge, a sharp contrast with the conservative charge limits found in most modern EVs. That prompt is not a glitch, it is a reflection of how Ford has tuned its LFP-based packs and their software.
In that same account, the writer described how the Ford Mustang Mach-E’s message contrasted with their expectations from other EVs, and how it forced a rethink of what “good” charging behavior looks like. The on-screen guidance is tailored to the specific battery under the floor, not a generic EV rulebook, and it reflects Ford’s decision to lean on LFP’s tolerance for high state of charge to deliver consistent range and a simpler ownership experience.
Inside Tesla’s split guidance: 80% for most, 100% for LFP
Tesla’s own recommendations highlight how chemistry-specific charging has become. An independent EV data firm summarized the company’s guidance this way: for most lithium ion packs, the ideal is to keep daily use between 30 percent and 80 percent, while reserving 100 percent for trips. That same overview notes that many owners still ask whether they should charge to 80% or 100%, because the old habits are hard to shake even as the hardware evolves.
In the same Overview, the analysts spell out that Tesla itself draws a line between chemistries. Two Key Reasons are given for the split: most packs are happiest when they avoid the extremes, but Tesla recommends that LFP drivers charge to 100% because the software that manages those batteries needs the full voltage range to stay accurate. That is why the same company can tell one group of owners to stop at 80% and another to plug in all the way to 100% without contradicting itself.
How LFP’s voltage curve confuses traditional BMS logic
The technical reason LFP packs sometimes need a full charge lies in how their voltage behaves. Traditional lithium ion chemistries show a more pronounced change in voltage as they charge and discharge, which gives the Battery Management System, or BMS, a clear signal to estimate remaining energy. LFP’s voltage curve is flatter, especially through the middle of the pack, which makes it harder for software to infer state of charge from voltage alone.
A detailed explainer on LFP EV charging notes that The BMS in these cars estimates condition and range from voltage, current, and temperature, but Because LFP has such a flat voltage profile, the system benefits from seeing the pack at both true empty and true full from time to time. That report explains that many EV drivers still follow a generic “never hit 100” habit, even though for LFP this can lead to inaccurate range estimates and poorer performance in severe cold, because the software never gets a clean reference point at the top of the pack. The piece on why 100% matters for BMS accuracy makes clear that the chemistry’s quirks are driving the new advice.
What owners are seeing in real cars: Mach-E forums and Tesla threads
On the ground, owners are piecing this together from a mix of manuals, in-car prompts, and community experience. In one Mach-E discussion, a user named Jun stressed that Storing a vehicle’s high voltage battery at higher states of charge is less favorable than parking it lower, but also noted that LFP has less battery density and is engineered to experience less battery degradation versus NCM. That nuance, shared in a Mach-E thread, captures the tension between long-term storage best practice and the day-to-day reality of using the full pack.
Another Mach-E owner forum has circulated what appears to be Ford’s own guidance for its lithium phosphate packs. A Well, Known Member quoting a user called Bjbena asked, Should LFP batteries be charged to 100% and then relayed that battery scientists generally suggest charging to 100% for this chemistry, while still acknowledging that a lower daily target can be chosen if the driver has a longer daily range than they need. That same forum exchange underscores that Ford is not simply chasing range headlines, it is aligning owner behavior with what its engineers expect from LFP.
Tesla’s LFP reality: RWD packs, calibration, and owner routines
Tesla’s rear-wheel-drive, or RWD, models have become a case study in how LFP changes daily charging. In a discussion among Model 3 owners, one contributor explained that the RWD uses LFP batteries, a different chemistry compared to the longer range packs, and that this is why the car is comfortable with regular full charges. The same owner noted that the BMS in these cars relies heavily on voltage to estimate remaining energy, which is why the company encourages a full charge to keep that estimate based off the voltage as accurate as possible, a point shared in a Model 3 thread.
On a separate Tesla forum, owners of LFP cars have debated how often to go all the way to the top. One long-running discussion framed it this way: It’s still a Lithium Ion chemistry, so the usual cautions apply, but the consensus is that an occasional 100% charge to recalibrate the BMS is not only safe but recommended. That Feb thread reflects how owners are reconciling Tesla’s guidance with their own instincts, using full charges as a tool for software accuracy rather than a daily habit in every situation.
Why 100% matters for BMS calibration, not just range
Behind the scenes, the calibration question looms large. A separate group of Tesla owners focused on the specifics of how close to full is “full enough” for the BMS to learn. One contributor argued that If the point of charging to 100% is to get more accurate BMS/remaining charge displayed afterwards, then stopping short, for example at a 95 percent or an 80% charge, may not give the software the clean top-of-pack reference it needs. That Aug discussion reinforces the idea that the number on the screen is not just about how far you can drive, it is about how well the car understands its own battery.
Technical explainers have echoed that logic. One guide to Tesla’s LFP strategy notes that There are two main reasons Tesla wants owners to accept full charging with LFP batteries: first, the car’s Battery Manag system needs the full span of voltages to stay calibrated, and second, the chemistry’s durability makes that practice acceptable. The same piece likens a periodic full charge to stepping on a bathroom scale occasionally to ensure accurate readings, a metaphor that appears in a charging guide that has circulated widely among owners.
Best practices: daily limits, storage habits, and when to hit 100%
For drivers, the practical question is how to turn all this into a routine. One widely cited set of recommendations for LFP packs in Your EV suggests that while these batteries are robust, they still benefit from thoughtful habits. The guide, titled Best Practices for Long, Lasting LFP Batteries, advises avoiding extreme lows, not leaving the car parked at 100 percent for extended periods, and using full charges strategically to keep the BMS in sync. It frames the advice as a way to Have confidence in both longevity and day-to-day usability, a message laid out in a Sep explainer.
Ford-specific communities have tried to translate that into concrete schedules. One Mach-E owner summary recommends that drivers of Mustang Mach-E Batteries with Standard Range packs Charge to 100% at least occasionally, while keeping most daily use between 15% and 80% to balance convenience and long-term health. That same post walks owners through how to Locate the Vehicle Identification Number, or VIN, on the driver-side door to confirm whether their car uses LFP before adopting that pattern, advice shared in an Aug Mach-E thread. The message is consistent: know your chemistry, then set your charge limit accordingly.
What the research and experts say about LFP abuse and resilience
Battery specialists have tried to quantify just how forgiving LFP really is. A technical video on common mistakes with these packs cites a 2020 paper from the Journal of the Electrochemical Society, describing a study titled “degr…” that compared LFP to other types. The presenter, in a segment flagged at a specific timestamp, argues that the data show LFP can handle more full cycles and higher average state of charge before suffering the same level of degradation as some nickel-based chemistries, a point made in a Dec walkthrough of what not to do with an EV’s LFP battery.
That resilience is part of why Tesla and Ford are comfortable telling certain owners to go all the way to 100%. Another detailed guide to Optimal Charging Strategies for LFP Batteries lays out a table of Tesla LFP Battery Charging Recomme that explicitly endorses daily full charges for some use cases, while still cautioning against leaving the car parked at 100 percent for long periods without driving. The same Apr analysis notes that this approach offers welcome peace of mind for drivers who want to use the entire advertised range without feeling they are harming the pack.
How I interpret the split: chemistry, software, and owner trust
Looking across Ford’s prompts, Tesla’s split guidance, and the owner forums, I see a clear pattern. The old “never charge to 100” mantra was a blunt tool for a world dominated by one family of lithium ion chemistries and relatively simple BMS logic. As LFP spreads into mainstream models like the Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range and Tesla’s RWD cars, the companies are asking owners to trust more nuanced instructions that reflect the specific chemistry under the floor and the software that watches over it.
In practice, that means I view 100 percent as a tool rather than a taboo. For NCM and similar packs, I still treat 80% as a sensible daily ceiling and reserve full charges for trips. For LFP-equipped Mach-E and Tesla models, I am comfortable following the on-screen or in-app recommendation to charge to 100% regularly, while still avoiding long-term storage at that level. The emerging consensus from Jun’s Mach-E posts, Tesla’s own Overview of 80% versus 100%, and the detailed LFP guides is that chemistry and BMS design, not folklore, should dictate how far you slide the charge limit slider each night.
More from MorningOverview