Federal data on methane emissions and groundwater contamination from U.S. landfills reveal environmental threats that extend far beyond the smell of rotting garbage. The EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program tracks facility-level emissions from municipal solid waste sites across the country, while a U.S. Geological Survey study has documented the flow of toxic chemicals from landfill leachate into public wastewater systems. Together, these findings raise hard questions about whether existing regulations do enough to protect the communities that live alongside these sites.
Methane Models May Mask the Full Picture
When organic waste breaks down in a landfill without oxygen, it generates a cocktail of gases. Methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor are the primary outputs, along with trace amounts of other gases, according to the University of Colorado Environmental Center. Methane is the chief concern: it traps heat in the atmosphere far more effectively than carbon dioxide over a 20-year window, making landfills a significant contributor to warming. Gas collection systems installed at many sites are designed to capture a portion of these emissions before they escape, but the gap between what is captured and what actually reaches the atmosphere is poorly understood.
That gap matters because of how the federal government counts landfill emissions. Under the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, municipal solid waste landfills report under landfill reporting rules, while industrial waste landfills report under a separate subpart. The net emissions figures published in the EPA’s FLIGHT tool are not direct measurements. They represent modeled estimates that account for gas generation, soil oxidation credits, the volume of gas collected and destroyed, and destruction efficiency, according to the EPA’s Subpart HH guidance. A common reporting error, the agency itself warns, is confusing “gas collected” with “gas generated” or “gas actually emitted.” If soil oxidation credits or destruction efficiency assumptions are even slightly generous, the reported numbers could systematically undercount the methane that drifts into surrounding neighborhoods.
Leachate Carries PFAS Into Public Water Systems
Below the surface, a different hazard brews. Rainwater percolating through buried waste picks up a stew of chemicals and becomes leachate, a dark liquid that many landfills pipe to municipal wastewater treatment plants. A USGS study used paired sampling of leachate, wastewater treatment plant influent, and treatment plant effluent to measure what those transfers actually deliver. The researchers also sampled comparison treatment plants that did not receive leachate. The results were striking: detection frequencies and concentrations were reported for dozens of PFAS compounds along with 109 pharmaceuticals and 21 hormones. Plants receiving landfill leachate showed measurably higher contamination loads than those that did not.
PFAS, often called “forever chemicals” because they resist natural breakdown, have been linked to cancer, thyroid disease, and immune suppression. The USGS findings suggest that conventional wastewater treatment does not fully strip these compounds before effluent is discharged into rivers and streams. For communities downstream of treatment plants that accept landfill leachate, this creates an exposure pathway that most residents never think about. Federal regulations under municipal landfill standards require upgradient and downgradient groundwater monitoring at municipal solid waste landfills, with detection monitoring designed to trigger a more intensive assessment if contamination exceeds set thresholds. But those rules focus on groundwater near the landfill itself, not on what happens after leachate enters the broader wastewater network, where contaminants can move far beyond the footprint of the original dump.
Health Risks for Nearby Residents
The gases that escape collection systems do not just warm the planet. Landfills can produce objectionable odors, according to the New York State health department, and some of those odors signal compounds with direct health consequences. Hydrogen sulfide, the rotten-egg gas common near active and closed landfills, has drawn particular scrutiny. A peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health found that exposure to H₂S, identified as a tracer of airborne contamination from landfills, was associated with higher lung cancer deaths and increased morbidity for respiratory diseases among people living close to municipal waste sites.
That association does not prove landfill gas directly causes cancer, and the researchers were careful to frame H₂S as a marker for broader airborne contamination rather than the sole culprit. Still, the correlation is difficult to dismiss, especially for the millions of Americans who live within a few miles of an active or closed landfill. Most public health conversations about landfills center on groundwater, but airborne exposure may pose risks that current monitoring frameworks are not built to catch. Community complaints about odors often surface long before formal air monitoring begins, suggesting that residents themselves may be the first and most sensitive detectors of landfill-related air pollution.
Regulation Gaps and the Closure Problem
Even after a landfill stops accepting waste, its environmental footprint persists. EPA rules require closure covers designed to minimize water infiltration, a measure intended to prevent what regulators describe as the “bathtub effect,” where water pools inside a capped landfill and accelerates leachate production. Landfill air controls fall under the Clean Air Act, with performance standards for new and modified sites laid out in the agency’s landfill air standards. These rules focus on installing and operating gas collection and control systems when emissions cross certain thresholds, but they do not necessarily guarantee that all significant leaks are detected or repaired quickly, particularly at older facilities transitioning into post-closure care.
Post-closure monitoring is typically time-limited, even though buried waste can keep generating methane and leachate for decades. As covers settle and crack, new pathways can open for gas and water movement, potentially undermining earlier engineering controls. Meanwhile, many communities lack easy access to technical reports or paywalled journals that would help them interpret monitoring data. Publicly available federal resources, such as USGS information products, can provide broader geological and hydrological context, but they do not replace site-specific oversight. When residents suspect something is wrong (unusual odors, discolored well water, or health clusters), the formal channels for responding can seem opaque and slow, especially if regulators view the landfill as “closed” and therefore lower priority.
Community Oversight and Accountability
Given the uncertainties embedded in emissions models and the diffuse nature of leachate-related contamination, community oversight has become an important backstop. Residents who live near landfills can track facility performance and enforcement history through federal databases, and they can press for additional monitoring where gaps appear. The EPA’s online tools allow the public to review reported greenhouse gas emissions, air permits, and inspection records, but using them effectively often requires a steep learning curve and sustained local organizing. In many places, neighborhood groups have stepped into that role, pairing lived experience of odors and dust with technical assistance from independent scientists.
Federal agencies have tried to make at least part of this process more accessible. One example is the Enforcement and Compliance History Online system, which lets users report suspected violations at landfills and other regulated facilities. Submitting a complaint does not guarantee immediate action, yet it does create a record that can support future investigations or enforcement. Combined with state public records laws and local zoning hearings, these tools give communities some leverage in debates over landfill expansions, post-closure plans, and leachate disposal contracts. Still, the underlying science about methane leakage, PFAS mobility, and long-term health risks is evolving faster than many regulatory frameworks. That mismatch can leave residents wondering what really lurks beneath a local landfill, and whether official numbers reflect what they smell in the air or taste in their water.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
