The US Navy’s newest “lightning carrier” concept has moved from experiment to front-line reality, cruising into waters that Beijing increasingly treats as its own preserve. By pushing a big-deck amphibious ship packed with F-35B jets toward China’s maritime doorstep, Washington is signaling that it intends to complicate any attempt at regional dominance and keep high-end airpower on call in contested seas.
At the same time, traditional supercarriers are surging in and out of the same theater, underscoring how the United States is layering old and new tools to manage simultaneous flashpoints from the South China Sea to the Middle East. I see the lightning carrier as the flexible middleweight in that mix, designed to operate where a full Nimitz-class strike group might be politically or militarily harder to send.
From concept to forward-deployed “lightning carrier”
The idea of turning an amphibious assault ship into a mini carrier built around F-35B jets started as a bold experiment rather than a standing mission. Apr reporting described how The US Navy sent the USS Wasp into the South China Sea loaded with an unusually heavy configuration of Marine Corps F-35Bs, turning what had been a helicopter-centric platform into a concentrated airpower node. That deployment showed that a ship originally built to put Marines ashore could instead function as a fast-moving strike asset, able to launch stealth jets from a smaller hull than a supercarrier.
What began as a proof of concept is now baked into force posture. A more recent analysis of a “lightning carrier” sailing up to China’s backdoor highlighted how As the only permanently forward-deployed expeditionary strike group, the amphibious force in Japan is now expected to operate in the same high-threat environments that used to be the preserve of full carrier strike groups. In that context, the “lightning carrier” is not a niche experiment but a central feature of how the Navy and Marine Corps intend to fight inside contested anti-access and area denial networks.
USS Tripoli brings F-35 punch to Japan
The clearest embodiment of this shift is The America-class amphibious assault ship The America class vessel USS Tripoli (LHA 7), which is shifting from the US West Coast to Sasebo, Japan, as part of a scheduled rotation of forces. Official statements describe how the ship will relieve another big-deck amphibious platform and move to San Diego in turn, but the strategic effect is that a purpose-built F-35B host is now permanently parked much closer to Taiwan and the East China Sea. That relocation effectively turns Tripoli into a standing lightning carrier in the Western Pacific rather than a visitor on deployment cycles.
Tripoli’s air wing is what makes that move so consequential. The ship was Commissioned in 2020 and tested with a full complement of F-35Bs during its 2022 maiden deployment, proving it could sustain high-tempo night operations in contested A2/AD environments. Subsequent reporting on USS Tripoli emphasized how those F-35B night operations in the Indo-Pacific were designed specifically to stress the ship and its crew in the kind of high-threat scenarios they would face near China. In practical terms, that means Tripoli can surge stealth strike sorties, electronic warfare, and intelligence collection from a hull that is smaller and potentially more politically acceptable in allied ports than a full supercarrier.
Tripoli as a “lightning carrier” on China’s flank
As Tripoli heads toward its new homeport, the Navy is explicit about the role it expects the ship to play. A detailed look at the move noted that The USS Tripoli, the Navy’s newest F-35 “lightning carrier,” is being stationed in the Indo Pacific to bolster US air power near China. The ship can carry up to 35 F-35Bs when configured as a lightning carrier, a density of fifth-generation jets that starts to rival the striking power of a traditional carrier air wing. That capacity, combined with the ship’s amphibious roots, gives commanders a choice between loading Tripoli with jets for sea control or mixing in helicopters and landing craft for Marine operations ashore.
Strategically, positioning that kind of platform in Japan means the United States can keep a stealth-heavy air group inside the first island chain without always needing to sail a Nimitz-class ship into the same waters. A separate analysis of the forward-deployed expeditionary strike group stressed that Jan operations by that force are meant to demonstrate that the Navy and Marine Corps can fight as an integrated team inside China’s weapons envelope. In my view, Tripoli’s arrival in Sasebo locks that message in place: the lightning carrier is no longer a visitor “cruising up” to China’s maritime approaches, it is a resident presence that can surge into hotspots on short notice.
Supercarriers still set the tempo in contested seas
Even as lightning carriers gain prominence, the traditional supercarrier remains the centerpiece of US naval signaling around China. Recent coverage of a Nimitz-class deployment described how the Navy Just Sent a Nimitz Class Supercarrier Into’s Backyard, underscoring that Washington is still willing to send its largest and most visible ships into disputed waters. Visuals of USS Abraham Lincoln CVN The Nimitz class carrier operating in the South China Sea highlighted its hull number 72 and showcased flight deck operations that remain unmatched by any regional navy.
Those deployments are not just about China. The Pentagon recently ordered USS Abraham Lincoln to leave the South China Sea after live-fire drills near Scarborough Shoal and steam toward the Middle East as Iran faced internal turmoil. A separate account from San Diego described how an F-35 Lightning II stealth jet launched from the USS Abraham Lincoln, with the File photo courtesy of the Navy underscoring how the same air wing that trains near China can be redirected to deter threats elsewhere. That kind of rapid redeployment is exactly why Washington still invests in supercarriers even as it experiments with more distributed concepts.
Distributed power, shifting risks
For all their differences, lightning carriers and supercarriers are part of a single, evolving playbook that spreads risk and complicates an adversary’s targeting problem. A social media discussion about whether the However USS Carl Vinson is still active underscores how much public attention still gravitates toward the biggest ships, but the operational story is increasingly about how many different decks can launch F-35 variants in a crisis. When Tripoli operates as a lightning carrier alongside a Nimitz-class ship, Beijing has to account for multiple stealth-capable flight decks, each with its own escorts and amphibious options.
That distributed posture also has to contend with non-adversary risks, from weather to logistics. A report on hurricane preparations in the Atlantic described how Navy Eyes the said future decisions would track the latest forecasts and storm models, and that the Navy would adjust operations as conditions change. The same mindset applies in the Indo-Pacific, where typhoons, political crises, and simultaneous contingencies from the Taiwan Strait to the Persian Gulf can all force rapid shifts in where lightning carriers and supercarriers sail. In that fluid environment, having Tripoli and its F-35Bs effectively parked on China’s doorstep gives Washington a flexible tool that can either stay put as a regional backstop or sprint to the next crisis without leaving a vacuum behind.
More from Morning Overview