Apple’s AirTag was sold as a simple way to find lost keys or a misplaced backpack, but a growing subculture of tinkerers has quietly turned it into a far more stealthy tracking tool. In one widely shared clip, a US user shows how physically disabling the tiny speaker lets the tracker work in “silent mode”, something Apple never advertises and clearly did not design as a mainstream feature. I set out to unpack how that hack works, why it is so controversial, and what it reveals about the uneasy balance between theft protection and anti‑stalking safeguards.
The core idea is brutally simple: if you stop an AirTag from chirping, it becomes much harder for anyone being tracked to know it is there. That makes it more useful for hiding in a car wheel well or camera bag, but it also cuts straight across the protections Apple built to stop people being followed without their consent. The result is a cat‑and‑mouse game between hardware hackers, people worried about surveillance, and the engineers in Cupertino trying to keep both sides in check.
Inside the “silent AirTag” hack
The hack that has captured so much attention starts with a basic teardown. In one tutorial, the host shows how to twist the stainless steel back of an Apple Air Tag counterclockwise to pop off the back and expose the battery and speaker contacts. From there, the “genius” move is not software at all, it is hardware: physically separating or removing the tiny speaker so the device can no longer emit sound while the Bluetooth and ultra‑wideband radios keep working. The US creator who popularised the trick frames it as a way to protect expensive gear in a car or checked luggage without broadcasting the tag’s location to a thief every few minutes.
That approach builds on a broader community of AirTag experimenters who have been probing the device since launch. A detailed hardware analysis of Apple AirTag units shows how compact the speaker assembly is and how easily it can be isolated once the back is off. In that sense, the US man’s “hack” is less a software exploit and more a clever repurposing of a design that was never meant to be user‑serviceable, turning a consumer tracker into a semi‑covert beacon that rides on the same Find My network as a stock tag.
Speaker removal, patched methods and workarounds
Once the silent‑mode idea spread, others rushed to refine it. One early method involved cutting a small trace or prying off the speaker coil, but Apple quietly adjusted the internal layout so that particular trick no longer worked as cleanly. In a widely shared post, a user named You bluntly notes that the original speaker removal method “has been patched”, then explains that the Same principle still applies if you are willing to slide a box‑cutter blade into one of the upper triangles of the plastic shell and work more carefully. The message is clear: Apple can tweak the internals, but determined owners will keep finding new mechanical paths to the same outcome.
Video guides have become more polished too. One clip walks through how to remove the speaker from an Apple Air Tag step by step, from twisting off the back to lifting out the battery and then delicately prying the speaker plate away from the rest of the electronics. Another tutorial on how to remove the AirTag speaker to mute it, which explicitly promises “no harm to the” rest of the device, shows the same basic process and then tests the result by triggering a sound from an iPhone that never plays because the Air Tag can no longer chirp. The fact that these guides exist at all underlines how mainstream the silent‑mode idea has become, even if Apple has never endorsed it.
Why some owners want stealth mode
When I talk to AirTag owners who have tried this, they rarely describe themselves as hackers. They are photographers hiding a tag in a Pelican case, cyclists tucking one into the frame of a Trek Domane, or drivers slipping a tracker into the spare‑wheel cavity of a 2018 Toyota Camry. Their argument is that if a thief hears the AirTag’s chirp, the game is over. One popular video on protecting your gear better with an Apple tracker spells this out, advising viewers to press and twist to remove the battery cover, tip out the battery, then reassemble the tag in a hidden spot so it cannot easily give away its hiding place. The US man’s silent‑speaker twist is simply the most aggressive version of that same instinct.
Hardware analysts have pointed out that Apple itself created this tension. In a detailed breakdown of Antitheft Or Antistalking trade‑offs, one commentator notes that Occasionally the extra features added to prevent stalking, such as regular beeps and on‑screen alerts, can undermine the usefulness of the tag for recovering stolen items. The US creator’s hack is a blunt attempt to pick a side in that trade‑off, sacrificing the audible warning in favour of a better chance of tracking down a stolen bike or suitcase after the fact.
The stalking problem Apple cannot ignore
There is a darker side to all of this. From the moment AirTags launched, advocates warned that a cheap, precise tracker could be misused to follow people without their knowledge. A widely viewed television segment on concerns over reports of Apple AirTags being used to stalk people shows victims describing how they discovered a hidden tag only after their iPhone flashed an alert and the device started to chirp, and it highlights how Apple was forced to respond. Those audible beeps are not an afterthought, they are a core part of the company’s argument that the product can be used safely.
Privacy researchers have since documented how the system is supposed to work. One detailed explainer on AirTag stalking notes that Automatic audio alerts are designed to kick in After an AirTag has been separated from its owner’s device for a period, typically between four and twelve hours of being out of Bluetooth range, so that someone being followed has a chance to hear the chirp and investigate. The same guide stresses that this Bluetooth based warning is especially important for people on Android who do not get the same rich on‑screen prompts as iPhone owners, and it walks through how to scan for unknown trackers using a dedicated app from Apple or third parties. If a US user disables the speaker, they are not just making their own tag quieter, they are actively undermining the safety net that Automatic alerts were meant to provide.
Clones, law enforcement and the limits of Apple’s control
Even if Apple could somehow stop every owner from opening a tag, the company would still face a bigger problem: copycats. Security researchers have already built an AirTag‑style device that rides on the same Find My network but strips out some of the built‑in safeguards. In one investigation, experts describe how they created a Find My compatible clone that can bypass certain anti‑tracking alerts, and they quote Apple’s own warning that “If an AirTag, set of AirPods, or Find My network accessory is discovered to be unlawfully tracking a person, law enforcement can” request identifying information about the owner. That legal backstop is important, but it does little to help someone who never hears a chirp because the speaker has been removed.
More from Morning Overview
