Divergent Technologies and its partner CoAspire have delivered what they describe as an affordable, adaptable cruise missile structure that went from a blank design sheet to first flight in just 16 weeks. The weapon, called the Rapid Affordable Air-launched Cruise Missile, or RAACM, is built to launch from air, land, and sea platforms, placing it squarely in the Pentagon’s push for multi-domain strike options. The announcement lands as the U.S. Navy separately validated a sea-based hypersonic launch capability, signaling that American defense firms and military branches are racing to field weapons that can threaten adversaries from every angle.
From Clean Sheet to First Flight in 16 Weeks
The speed of RAACM’s development cycle is the sharpest detail in the announcement. Divergent Technologies, a California-based company specializing in AI-driven manufacturing, said it delivered adaptable cruise missile structures that enabled CoAspire’s RAACM to be designed, manufactured, and flight-tested within a 16-week window. That timeline compresses what traditionally takes defense contractors years into a matter of months, a gap that Congress has repeatedly flagged as a weakness in American weapons procurement. Divergent attributes the acceleration to its digital design tools and automated production cells, which allow engineers to iterate structural concepts rapidly without retooling traditional assembly lines.
The missile sits in the Mk-82/GBU-38 class in physical size, which means it roughly matches the dimensions of a standard 500-pound bomb already carried by most U.S. tactical aircraft. That size class matters because it suggests RAACM could fit on existing weapon stations without expensive airframe modifications. Its modular architecture allows sections of the missile to be swapped or reconfigured for different mission profiles, warhead types, or launch platforms. Rather than building a new missile for each service branch, the design philosophy bets on one adaptable frame serving the Air Force, Navy, and Army alike, with shared components that could simplify logistics, depot maintenance, and training pipelines across the services.
A Weapon Designed for Air, Sea, and Land
RAACM’s defining selling point is its stated ability to deploy across air, land, and sea platforms. Most cruise missiles in the U.S. arsenal are optimized for a single launch domain; for example, long-range naval weapons are typically confined to surface ships or submarines, while air-launched systems are tailored to fighter and bomber hardpoints. RAACM’s designers at CoAspire appear to be targeting the gap between expensive, domain-specific weapons and the Pentagon’s growing appetite for cheaper munitions that can be stockpiled in large numbers across all services. If the modular concept works at scale, a single production line could supply weapons for destroyers, ground-based launchers, and fighter wings simultaneously, improving flexibility when combatant commanders surge forces to different theaters.
That ambition, however, runs into real budget friction. The Fiscal Year 2024 defense authorization report discussed RAACM in an official congressional context, including language about the rapid development and production of cost-effective air-launched cruise missiles. But the same report raised concerns about the funding path and the Future Years Defense Program, or FYDP, for the weapon. In plain terms, lawmakers liked the concept but questioned whether the Pentagon had committed enough money over the next five years to move RAACM from flight tests to full-rate production. Without a clear FYDP line, even promising prototypes can stall in the so-called “valley of death” between demonstration and fielding, leaving industry partners with little incentive to invest in long-lead materials or expanded factory capacity.
Navy Validates Sea-Based Hypersonic Launch
Separate from RAACM but closely related in strategic logic, the U.S. Navy conducted a successful end-to-end flight test of its Conventional Prompt Strike capability, proving a sea-based hypersonic launch approach. The test used a cold-gas launch method, which ejects the missile from its canister using compressed gas before the rocket motor ignites, a technique that reduces stress on the launch platform and allows integration with existing vertical launch cells on submarines and surface ships. The CPS program is a joint effort between the Navy and the Army’s Strategic Strike Program, sharing a common All-Up-Round, or AUR, to cut costs across services by standardizing the missile body and key components while tailoring only the launchers and fire-control systems.
The successful CPS test provides concrete evidence that the United States has moved beyond paper studies and failed prototypes in the hypersonic domain. For years, critics pointed to repeated test failures and schedule slips as proof that American hypersonic efforts lagged behind Chinese and Russian programs. A verified end-to-end flight changes that narrative by showing that the guidance, propulsion, and thermal protection systems can function together under operationally relevant conditions. It also establishes a proven sea-based launch architecture that future weapons, potentially including variants of modular cruise missiles like RAACM, could eventually leverage if they are adapted for hypersonic speed profiles. The two programs are not formally linked, but they share a common strategic goal, giving commanders the ability to strike time-sensitive targets from multiple domains before an adversary can react or reposition critical assets.
Affordable Mass vs. Exquisite Precision
The tension at the heart of both RAACM and CPS is a broader debate inside the Pentagon about whether the U.S. military needs a small number of exquisite, high-end weapons or a large stockpile of cheaper, good-enough munitions. Hypersonic glide vehicles like CPS are expensive, technically demanding systems designed to defeat advanced air defenses and hold at risk the most critical, heavily protected targets. RAACM sits at the opposite end of the cost spectrum, aiming to be affordable enough to buy in bulk and expendable enough to use in the opening hours of a conflict without agonizing over unit cost. That contrast mirrors wider arguments about how to deter peer adversaries: through a handful of silver-bullet capabilities or through large salvos that can overwhelm defenses by sheer volume.
Congressional language in the FY2024 NDAA conference report reflects this split. Lawmakers pushed for rapid development of cost-effective cruise systems while simultaneously funding high-end hypersonic programs, signaling that they see value in a layered portfolio rather than a single marquee weapon. Under this logic, planners could saturate enemy defenses with large numbers of affordable cruise missiles while reserving hypersonic weapons for the hardest, most defended targets such as hardened command bunkers or mobile missile launchers. RAACM’s 16-week design-to-flight timeline and modular structure fit neatly into the “affordable mass” side of that equation, but only if the funding materializes to scale production beyond a handful of test articles. Without sustained appropriations, the concept risks becoming another demonstration program that proves what is technically possible without ever reshaping the day-to-day munitions inventory.
Industry, Data, and the Next Procurement Fight
Behind the technical milestones sits a quieter shift in how companies and the Pentagon manage data, intellectual property, and production risk. Divergent’s work on RAACM leans heavily on digital engineering tools, automated manufacturing, and tightly controlled design files that can be updated in near real time. Platforms such as secure industry portals are increasingly used to share controlled technical information, coordinate announcements, and synchronize messaging between prime contractors, smaller suppliers, and government customers. For emerging weapons like RAACM, that digital backbone is not just a marketing tool; it underpins configuration management, test reporting, and the rapid design iterations that made a 16-week development sprint feasible.
Those same tools will shape the next procurement fight as Congress and the Pentagon decide how much of the future munitions budget should go toward modular cruise missiles versus hypersonic systems and traditional legacy weapons. If RAACM and similar programs can demonstrate that digital manufacturing reliably delivers lower costs, faster updates, and cross-domain flexibility, they will strengthen the case for shifting dollars away from bespoke, single-mission platforms. Conversely, if hypersonic systems like CPS continue to clear key milestones and demonstrate unique battlefield effects, pressure will grow to prioritize exquisite precision even at the expense of quantity. For now, the United States is hedging its bets, funding both rapid, affordable cruise missile concepts and cutting-edge hypersonic weapons in the hope that a diversified portfolio will deter adversaries and give commanders more options when crises erupt.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
