The blackout that plunged Venezuela’s capital into darkness during the raid to seize Nicolás Maduro was not a side show, it was the opening move. President Donald Trump has since claimed that the United States “turned off” Caracas using “certain expertise,” framing the power cut as proof of American reach in the shadows. To understand what that means, I need to trace how the lights went out, what tools were likely used, and why this operation marks a turning point in how Washington fights wars.
From air armada to vanished skyline
The assault on Maduro unfolded as a tightly choreographed display of force, with the blackout as its central special effect rather than an afterthought. Trump’s own team has highlighted that roughly 150 aircraft were committed to the mission, taking off from about 20 airbases spread across the Western Hemisph. That scale alone tells me the blackout was not improvisation. You do not marshal that kind of airpower and then leave the city’s grid to chance.
Trump later boasted that power in Caracas had been largely turned off “due to a certain expertise that we have,” a line that instantly raised the question of whether the United States had just demonstrated a new doctrine of digital first strikes. In his formal statement, Trump cast the broader campaign in Venezuela as one of the most stunning and effective displays of American military competence in modern history, and the synchronized loss of electricity in the capital was presented as proof that the operation had been engineered down to the last circuit breaker. When I line up those statements with the scale of the air campaign, the blackout looks less like a lucky break and more like the signature move of a preplanned playbook.
Execution in total darkness
What happened on the ground in Venezuela confirms that the power cut was designed to shape the battlefield, not simply to shock the public. Operational accounts describe the raid as an Execution in Total Darkness, with U.S. forces deliberately waiting several days for thick cloud cover before moving. That choice of timing, tied to weather and visibility, only makes sense if the attackers expected to operate with night-vision superiority while Venezuelan defenders were literally and figuratively in the dark. The blackout stripped Maduro’s security of cameras, street lighting and much of their communications backbone at the exact moment elite units were closing in.
One detailed narrative of “The Night the Lights Went Out in Caracas” describes “Operation Absolute Resolve” as a masterclass in asymmetric warfare, with U.S. planners ensuring that almost no neighborhood had reliable power, light or security systems when the first helicopters appeared. That account dovetails with broader reporting that the pre-dawn raid was the culmination of months of planning, in which the blackout was treated as a primary effect rather than a collateral one. When I put those pieces together, the phrase “total darkness” is not just a dramatic flourish, it is a literal description of the conditions U.S. forces engineered to neutralize Maduro’s last lines of defense.
What “certain expertise” likely means
Trump’s coy reference to “certain expertise” has fueled speculation about whether the United States used cyber tools, physical sabotage or some blend of both to collapse the grid. Analysts who have examined the sequence of events argue that the most plausible scenario is a coordinated cyber operation against Venezuela’s creaking power infrastructure, potentially combined with precision strikes on key substations. One commentary notes that Once Trump gave the order, roughly 150 m aircraft surged toward Carac while digital teams worked to trigger a cascading failure in the national grid. The timing of the blackout, arriving just as that armada closed in, suggests that the “expertise” was less about a single magic switch and more about synchronizing multiple levers of power.
Technical reporting on the raid points to a broader trend in which cyber warfare is becoming the first strike in modern conflicts, with one Story by Rob Lenihan describing how the night the lights went out in Caracas fits a pattern of digital “effects” paving the way for kinetic action. In that framing, Trump’s phrase is less a boast about a single classified tool and more a nod to a maturing doctrine in which cyber operators, electronic warfare units and special forces work as a single system. The expertise is in the integration: knowing which control rooms to infiltrate, which transmission lines to overload and how to time those disruptions so that defenders are still rebooting their systems when the first boots hit the ground.
Inside the cyber playbook
To decode how the blackout might have been executed, I look at the specific hints U.S. officials and outside experts have dropped since the raid. Trump himself has said that the United States used “certain expertise” to cut power in Venezuela while capturing its president, and Officials have alluded to a mix of cyber and electronic warfare rather than a simple bombing run. One analysis of the mission notes that the United States brought significant airpower to bear but that the blackout itself was likely a more targeted and less physically destructive operation than a full-scale attack on power plants. That distinction matters, because it suggests Washington was trying to disable Maduro’s command-and-control without triggering a humanitarian catastrophe that would have complicated the political fallout.
Technical experts quoted in the same discussion point out that the United States has long invested in tools that can map foreign grids, identify critical nodes and then manipulate them remotely. One specialist argued that “that is sufficient to build” the kind of access needed to shut down a city’s lights in a mission like this, a line that tracks with the idea that U.S. operators had been inside Venezuelan networks for some time before Trump gave the order. The reference to sufficiency appears in an analysis of how the blackout was achieved, where the phrase “That is sufficient to build” a detailed picture of the grid is used to explain how cyber teams could trigger cascading failures without physically occupying any power stations. When I connect that to Trump’s own claim that the United States shut off the lights in the capital using “certain expertise,” it points to a playbook in which digital reconnaissance and pre-positioned malware are as central to the mission as the helicopters that carried the assault teams.
The new face of American power
Trump’s rhetoric around the raid has been characteristically triumphant, but it also reveals how the White House wants the world to see this operation. In his official remarks, he described the action in Venezuela as one of the most powerful displays of Americ military might and competence, pairing the capture of Maduro with the image of a capital city suddenly stripped of electricity. Trump has also leaned into the idea that the United States can now selectively “turn off” hostile regimes, telling audiences that Trump and his commanders used “certain expertise” to shut off the lights in Venezuela. That framing is not just bravado, it is strategic messaging aimed at adversaries who now have to assume that their own grids and communications networks are similarly vulnerable.
For Venezuelans, the blackout was not an abstract demonstration of capability but a lived shock. Residents of Caracas experienced the night the lights went out as a sudden plunge into uncertainty, with hospitals, transport and basic services all thrown into chaos even as U.S. special operations forces moved through the city. A broader analysis of how cyber warfare is becoming the first strike in modern conflicts notes that the pre-dawn raid that saw U.S. units seize Maduro in Caracas is likely to be studied as a template for future operations. I see Trump’s claim that the United States blacked out the city with “certain expertise” as both a description and a warning: a signal that in the next crisis, the first sign of American power may not be jets overhead, but the sudden, engineered absence of light.
More from Morning Overview