Morning Overview

Trump ‘blockade’ stalls hundreds of US wind and solar projects nationwide

Federal agencies that once quietly signed off on wind and solar farms are now at the center of a political fight over the country’s energy future. Under President Donald Trump, routine approvals have slowed or stopped, leaving hundreds of projects in limbo and raising the risk of higher power prices and tighter electricity supplies. The administration’s allies frame the shift as a course correction, but developers describe a deliberate blockade that is reshaping where and how clean energy can be built.

At stake are more than 60 large wind and solar farms and hundreds of smaller installations that together would add significant capacity to the grid. Their fate will help determine whether the United States keeps expanding renewable power or doubles down on fossil fuels and older infrastructure. I see a pattern emerging that runs from obscure permitting offices to federal courtrooms, and it is already rippling through jobs, investment and climate planning.

The anatomy of a ‘blockade’

Developers describe a sharp break from past practice, with federal agencies slow-walking or freezing approvals that used to move on predictable timelines. Reports detail that more than 60 large wind and solar farms are now stalled, alongside hundreds of smaller projects that depend on federal land, wildlife consultations or grid connections. In many cases, officials have not formally denied permits, they have simply stopped moving them, a tactic that leaves companies unable to build yet also unable to challenge a clear decision.

The shift is most visible in how Federal agencies now handle environmental reviews and endangered species consultations that used to be relatively straightforward. The Trump administration has been halting or delaying approvals that were once seen as routine, particularly for projects on public land that require federal consultations. In some cases, developers say a project is now effectively dead even without a formal rejection, because financing and power contracts cannot survive years of uncertainty.

Permits, databases and ‘ugly’ projects

Behind the scenes, obscure procedural levers are doing much of the work. One flashpoint is a federal wildlife database that companies use to design projects around sensitive habitats. Advocates say that Interior Department has barred wind and solar companies from using that database, making it “impossible” for some projects to complete required reviews. Without access to the same information federal biologists rely on, developers are left guessing at mitigation plans that regulators will accept.

At the same time, the Army Corps of Engineers has begun weighing aesthetics in decisions about water permits for clean energy. As one account put it, Trump Administration Is, a striking standard in a permitting system that historically focused on wetlands, navigation and pollution. I see that as a signal that subjective judgments about viewsheds and “natural” landscapes are being elevated just as the country tries to build more visible infrastructure like turbines and transmission lines.

From land to sea: offshore wind in the crosshairs

The same pattern is playing out offshore, where the administration has tried to halt multiple wind farms along the East Coast. Federal officials argued that turbines could interfere with radar and maritime safety, prompting a wave of litigation. Courts have now stepped in, with rulings that Courts Overturn Trump efforts to Halt Offshore Wind Projects and allow construction to resume.

One of the most closely watched cases involves the Sunrise Wind Project, where a federal district court on Feb. 2, 2026, enjoined enforcement of a shutdown order tied to radar concerns. That decision followed a broader trend in which judges have allowed all five offshore wind projects blocked by the administration to move forward. One summary noted that Trump Administration Loses 5 of 5 legal fights against offshore wind, underscoring how aggressive the policy push has been and how skeptical the courts have become.

Local flashpoints and the politics of place

On the ground, the national fight over renewables is colliding with local fears and frustrations. In Virginia, residents like John Hood in the Croatan neighborhood of Virginia Beach have become vocal critics of Dominion Energy’s Coastal Virginia of offshore wind project, worried about everything from views to storm risks. Their opposition has helped create political cover for federal officials who are already inclined to slow or pause offshore wind development.

Similar tensions are emerging inland, where some communities welcome the tax base and jobs from new projects while others bristle at turbines on the horizon. Earlier coverage described how Suddenly the Trump Administration Tightens the Vise on Wind projects, with the Transportation Department recommending new restrictions at the same time. I see those local disputes not as the root cause of the blockade but as useful ammunition for an administration that has already decided to favor fossil fuels and grid status quo over rapid renewable buildout.

Economic fallout: jobs, bills and federal dollars

The permitting squeeze is landing on an industry already under pressure from shifting subsidies and global supply chains. Solar manufacturers and installers are warning of layoffs and cancellations as projects stall. One company, Enphase, which produces microinverters that turn solar energy into usable power, said it would cut 160 jobs, or 6 percent of its workforce, after a key tax credit expired and demand sagged. When projects that could replace that lost demand are stuck in federal review, the pain compounds.

Policy choices in Washington are amplifying those stresses. The Trump administration’s signature domestic law, the One Big Beautiful, could lead to $1.5 billion less in federal climate and energy investments, including programs that help Native American communities adapt and participate in the clean energy economy. Without those funds, tribes and rural areas that might otherwise host wind and solar farms lose both financial support and leverage in negotiations with developers.

More from Morning Overview