For more than a decade, carmakers treated giant touchscreens as the ultimate symbol of progress, stretching glass across dashboards and burying basic functions in digital menus. Now the industry is confronting an uncomfortable reality: those sleek panels are distracting, slower to use and, in critical moments, more dangerous than old‑fashioned knobs and switches. As drivers push back and safety data piles up, physical buttons are quietly returning to center stage.
I see a clear shift underway, from tech‑show spectacle toward a more pragmatic cockpit that respects human attention. The companies that once boasted about tablet‑like interfaces are beginning to admit that a moving vehicle is not the place for endless swiping and tapping, and that the safest interface is often the one you can operate by feel without ever looking down.
The touchscreen era meets its limits
Automakers spent years racing to outdo one another with ever larger displays, but the bragging rights are starting to look hollow. Several major brands, including Mercedes, Volkswagen, Audi and Hyun, have been held up as examples of how far the glass trend went, with climate controls, drive modes and even glovebox latches migrating into software. The idea was to mimic smartphones, consolidate hardware and project a futuristic image, yet in practice it often meant more taps for simple tasks and more time with eyes off the road.
As touch panels spread, they did not just replace radio dials and temperature wheels, they swallowed almost every secondary function. In many new models, changing the fan speed, adjusting seat heaters or tweaking driver‑assist settings requires navigating layered menus that feel natural on a couch but punishing in traffic. That design philosophy, which once seemed inevitable, is now being reassessed as both drivers and engineers acknowledge that a Car is not a phone and that the ergonomics of a moving cockpit demand a different standard.
Why touchscreens are a safety problem
The core issue is not aesthetics, it is attention. When a driver must look down, locate a small icon, confirm which submenu they are in and then hit a precise spot on glass, every extra second increases risk. Researchers in Sweden have found that completing common tasks with in‑car touch interfaces can take significantly longer than with physical controls, and that this added time translates directly into more distance traveled without eyes on the road, a pattern highlighted in legal analysis that notes how such delays can lead to distracted driving.
Human factors research has long shown that tactile feedback is crucial in complex environments, and the modern dashboard is no exception. When a driver can reach for a volume knob or a dedicated defrost button by muscle memory, they can keep their gaze on the road and their cognitive load lower. By contrast, flat glass offers no physical landmarks, so even a minor adjustment becomes a visual search. That is why critics describe touch‑heavy setups as a nightmare in real‑world use, and why some safety advocates argue that burying essentials like hazard lights or demisters in digital menus crosses a line from convenience into negligence.
Drivers never stopped wanting buttons
While designers chased minimalist interiors, drivers themselves were far less convinced. Survey work in Britain found that motorists overwhelmingly prefer traditional hardware, with research by Britain’s What Car reporting that 89 percent of respondents favored physical buttons over touch controls for key functions, a figure that has become a touchstone in the debate over driver preference. That is not nostalgia so much as practicality: people want to adjust temperature, audio and driver aids quickly, without hunting through icons that change with every software update.
Enthusiast communities have been even more blunt. In a discussion about living with the G82 BMW M4, one owner told Motoman they were with him “100% on the need for car makers to go back to putting buttons and switches in cars” for the most frequently used features, arguing that it is simply more difficult and “unsafer” to rely on touch panels for those tasks, a sentiment captured in a widely shared Motoman clip. When both everyday drivers and performance‑car owners converge on the same complaint, it signals a deeper mismatch between design trends and real‑world use.
The quiet comeback of knobs and switches
Faced with that backlash, carmakers are starting to reverse course. Physical buttons and knobs are making a visible return to dashboards across the world, as companies respond to customer feedback and internal safety reviews that highlight the limits of all‑screen layouts. In some recent models, climate controls have migrated back to a dedicated strip of keys, while volume and tuning knobs have reappeared where capacitive sliders once sat, a shift that reflects how strongly drivers are asking to bring Physical buttons back.
Industry analysts describe this as less a retreat from technology than a correction toward balance. As consumer preferences tilt toward practicality and ease of use, many brands are reintroducing physical controls for high‑priority functions, acknowledging that the earlier push to digitize everything went too far. The argument is that a well‑designed cockpit can still feature a central screen for navigation and apps, but that core driving tasks should be handled by hardware that works the same way every time, regardless of software updates or connectivity glitches, a point underscored in discussions of Why the renewed focus on tactile controls.
Designing a safer hybrid cockpit
The emerging consensus is not that touchscreens should disappear, but that they must be used more intelligently. Some manufacturers now pair central displays with dedicated hardware for the most common tasks, recognizing that a hybrid layout can deliver both modern features and intuitive operation. Earlier explorations of haptic technology in cars noted that, consequently, carmakers often combine touch screens with physical knobs and buttons so drivers can perform frequent actions like volume changes or temperature tweaks without looking away from the road, a strategy that aligns with the push for Consequently safer interfaces.
Safety specialists argue that the design priority should be simple: anything a driver might need while moving, from demisters to lane‑keeping toggles, should be operable by feel. That is why advocates of Physical controls emphasize that buttons and dials are easier and safer to use than Touchscreens in motion, since they can be located by touch alone and provide clear feedback when pressed, a distinction highlighted in technical analysis of Physical control layouts. The most promising interiors now treat the screen as a companion rather than a gatekeeper, reserving it for maps, media browsing and configuration, while letting the humble button reclaim its role as the driver’s quickest, safest tool.
Why the next generation of cars must learn from this
As new models are developed, the lesson from the touchscreen era is clear: technology that looks impressive in a showroom can be counterproductive on the road if it ignores human limits. Car manufacturers that are increasingly replacing physical buttons with touchscreens to control everything from the A/C to drive modes have discovered that what seems sleek and modern on paper can become a growing reliance on interfaces that slow drivers down and frustrate them in daily use, a pattern examined in detail in critiques of how From the all‑screen trend emerged. The next wave of cockpit design will be judged less on how futuristic it looks and more on how naturally it lets people drive.
I expect the pendulum to settle somewhere between the extremes of button‑covered dashboards and monolithic slabs of glass. Touch interfaces are not going away, but their role is being redefined as automakers, safety researchers and drivers converge on the same conclusion: in a moving Car, the safest control is the one you can find without thinking. If the industry takes that to heart, the return of buttons will not be a step backward, but a sign that car technology is finally catching up with the realities of the road.
More from Morning Overview