A single calculation, precipitation minus evapotranspiration, is reshaping how scientists understand the swing between flood and drought across global ecosystems. New research published in Nature Communications shows that evapotranspiration, the process by which plants and soil release water vapor, hits a ceiling of roughly 480 plus or minus 210 millimeters per year across many biomes. That saturation point means small shifts in rainfall can trigger outsized changes in the water left over for rivers, aquifers, and reservoirs, amplifying both extremes of the hydrologic cycle at a time when wet and dry events are already intensifying worldwide.
Why Evapotranspiration Saturates and What That Means
Water yield, the amount of precipitation that actually flows into streams and recharges groundwater, is commonly approximated as precipitation minus evapotranspiration. When ET plateaus, any additional rain runs off rather than being absorbed by vegetation and soil. Conversely, even a modest decline in rainfall can slash water yield sharply because the fixed ET demand consumes a larger share of the shrinking supply. Recent analysis in Nature Communications quantified this saturation threshold at approximately 480 plus or minus 210 mm per year, a range that appears to hold across forests, grasslands, and croplands despite their very different climates and plant communities.
The practical consequence is that ecosystems sit on a knife edge. In wet years, the saturated ET ceiling leaves a surplus with nowhere to go except downstream, swelling rivers and filling floodplains faster than infrastructure can safely convey the flow. In dry years, the same ceiling means vegetation continues drawing nearly as much moisture from the soil, starving streams and aquifers of recharge and pushing landscapes toward water stress even before people open a tap. This asymmetry is not just a modeling curiosity; it directly shapes the flood and drought risks that water managers, farmers, and cities confront season after season, and it helps explain why modest shifts in climate can translate into abrupt changes in water security.
Tracking Water From Orbit and Underground
Terrestrial water storage, or TWS, captures the full picture that surface measurements alone miss. TWS represents the total amount of water stored above and below the land surface, including groundwater, soil moisture, snowpack, and surface water in rivers, lakes, and reservoirs. NASA’s GRACE and GRACE-FO satellite missions detect tiny variations in Earth’s gravity field, allowing scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory to infer month-to-month changes in stored water across regions as large as major river basins. Those gravimetric data have become a cornerstone for tracking deep aquifer depletion and multi-year droughts that are invisible to short records from individual wells or gauges.
On the ground, the U.S. Geological Survey operates the National Water Information System, which provides streamflow records and other hydrologic time series from thousands of gauging stations across the United States. Each sensor’s readings are accompanied by flags and metadata that describe measurement limits, with those quality controls detailed in the system’s instantaneous values guidance. Together, satellite gravimetry and ground-based stream gauges create a layered monitoring system able to connect basin-scale storage changes with the flows that people actually see in rivers. Yet a gap persists: one of the clearest human fingerprints in TWS data is groundwater extraction at rates far exceeding natural replenishment, a pattern that satellites can map but that many water rights frameworks and infrastructure plans still do not fully incorporate.
Floods and Droughts Are Growing More Extreme
Between 2002 and 2022, the intensity of extreme wet and dry events sharply increased worldwide, and that intensification correlates with rising global surface temperatures, according to research in global hydrologic assessments. The trend is not symmetric in space or time: floods tend to erupt suddenly, concentrated in narrow windows that can overwhelm defenses, while droughts often stretch across months or years, quietly draining reservoirs and soils. This imbalance is compounded by the ET saturation effect, which accelerates runoff in wet periods and deepens deficits in dry ones, making it harder for basins to return to a stable middle ground.
That asymmetry has deep roots in the way landscapes evolve. Paleoclimate work along the lower Tennessee River, for example, has shown that prolonged droughts and major floods are opposite expressions of the same underlying water cycle, with an antecedent drought between roughly 7,100 and 5,600 years before present conditioning how the terrain later responded to heavy rainfall. Dry conditions harden soils, reduce infiltration, and promote vegetation loss, all of which set the stage for more destructive runoff when storms finally arrive. Modern monitoring reinforces this picture: researchers tracking seasonal storage changes in Central Oklahoma using ambient seismic noise have demonstrated that TWS fluctuations associated with drought can be detected in near real time, underscoring how closely community well-being is tied to the invisible water held within the ground.
Cities Depend on a Volatile Surface Supply
Most coverage of water risk focuses on agriculture, but the vulnerability of urban systems is just as acute. Surface water remains the principal or sole source for water supply systems in most cities, and comparative analyses of drinking water portfolios across large U.S. municipalities consistently find that rivers and reservoirs dominate urban supply. That dependence creates a direct link between the ET saturation problem and the taps in American kitchens: when water yield drops because evapotranspiration claims a fixed share of declining precipitation, reservoir levels fall quickly, and “reservoir drought” can leave millions of residents facing mandatory restrictions or emergency imports.
Soil moisture, which contributes roughly half of modeled terrestrial storage in some regions according to geodetic and hydrologic studies in Taiwan, acts as a buffer between rainfall and runoff, smoothing the peaks and troughs that cities must manage. When soils are relatively wet, they can absorb additional rain, delaying and reducing flood peaks downstream. When soils are dry after a prolonged deficit, much of the incoming water is either taken up to rebuild that storage or runs off rapidly over hardened surfaces, leaving less to seep into aquifers or replenish reservoirs. For utilities that rely on a narrow set of surface sources, this volatility translates into planning challenges: infrastructure sized for historical averages may swing between underuse in wet years and dangerous shortfalls in dry ones, even if total annual precipitation has not changed dramatically.
Rethinking Water Management Around Terrestrial Storage
To cope with the combined pressures of ET saturation, intensifying extremes, and growing demand, hydrologists are increasingly centering terrestrial water storage as the key organizing concept for water management. In this framing, TWS is not just a diagnostic variable but the core accounting ledger that tracks how much water a basin can actually spare without degrading ecosystems or depleting critical reserves. Recent synthesis work defines terrestrial storage as the sum of all water stored on and beneath the land surface that can transition between liquid, solid, and vapor, emphasizing that changes in this sum integrate many different processes, from snowmelt to groundwater pumping.
Framing policy around TWS leads to different choices than those driven solely by annual precipitation or mean river flow. Instead of treating groundwater, soil moisture, and surface reservoirs as separate silos, managers can view them as linked components of a single storage bank whose health determines long-term resilience. That perspective favors investments in measures that increase storage efficiency—such as managed aquifer recharge, floodplain reconnection, and soil conservation—over approaches that simply move more water faster through pipes and channels. It also highlights the need to align legal and economic systems with physical reality: if satellites and in situ networks show that a basin’s storage is trending downward despite stable rainfall, then existing extraction and allocation rules are effectively borrowing from the future. As evapotranspiration saturation sharpens the contrast between wet and dry periods, the regions that thrive will likely be those that treat terrestrial water storage not as an afterthought, but as the central metric guiding how much water they can safely use and how much they must leave in the ground.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
