The AI trade has become the market’s default answer to almost every question, from how to juice earnings to where to park cash for the next decade. Yet beneath the hype, a subtle shift in how companies are raising money is starting to flash the kind of warning that usually appears late in a cycle. The quiet change in equity issuance suggests the AI boom may be closer to a painful reset than investors want to believe.
Instead of a dramatic crash in prices, the first sign of trouble is showing up in the plumbing of capital markets, where insiders and early backers are quietly locking in gains. That pattern, combined with mounting concerns from veteran forecasters that AI has taken on the classic traits of a bubble, points to a simple but uncomfortable possibility: the most important signal that the AI party is ending is not in the headlines, but in the term sheets.
The under-the-radar signal: who is selling into the AI story
Late-stage bubbles rarely announce themselves with a single spectacular blowup. They tend to reveal their age in the behavior of people closest to the money, as founders, executives, and early investors shift from buying their own story to selling it. In the current AI cycle, that shift is showing up in a rising share of equity issuance taking place away from public markets, where sophisticated players can offload risk before retail investors fully register what is happening. Analysts who track issuance patterns note that with a rising share of deals happening in private placements and other less visible channels, the warning signs that the AI bubble is close to bursting are building quietly in the background, even as benchmark indexes still look healthy on the surface, a trend highlighted in recent equity issuance research.
What makes this signal so important is that it captures intent rather than narrative. Marketing decks can talk about “once-in-a-generation” platforms, but when insiders choose to sell stock into AI strength instead of doubling down, they are voting with their feet. The fact that this shift is happening in relatively opaque corners of the market, rather than through splashy secondary offerings, suggests a deliberate attempt to avoid spooking momentum-driven buyers. For investors on the outside, that combination of elevated valuations and increasingly discreet selling is exactly the sort of late-stage behavior that has preceded previous unwinds in sectors from dot-coms to clean tech.
Capital Economics’ rare warning and what it really means
While sentiment around AI remains exuberant, some macro-focused researchers are starting to flag the current pattern as statistically unusual. Analysts at Capital Economics describe the recent configuration of stock issuance and price action as a rare warning that the AI bubble could be nearing its peak. Their work points to a divergence between the volume of new equity being sold and the underlying fundamentals of earnings and cash flow, a gap that has historically been hard to sustain. When companies rush to issue stock into a hot theme while profitability lags, it is usually because management teams sense that the market is temporarily willing to pay almost any price for growth.
In practical terms, that means the AI trade is increasingly dependent on continued optimism rather than hard numbers. The more valuations stretch, the more sensitive they become to any disappointment in revenue growth, regulatory developments, or the pace of adoption in real-world products like generative search, copilots, and AI infrastructure. If the rare warning flagged by Capital Economics is right, the market is entering a phase where even small negative surprises can trigger outsized reactions, because so much future success has already been priced in. For investors, that is a very different environment from the early days of the boom, when expectations were low and every positive data point was a free upside option.
Why veteran bubble-watchers see 2026 as a breaking point
The quiet issuance signal is landing at the same time as a growing chorus of seasoned observers argue that the AI cycle is following a familiar script. Investor and economist Ruchir Sharma has pointed to at least four classic signs of a bubble in the current AI frenzy, including the speed and scale of capital pouring into the sector and the way a handful of mega-cap names have come to dominate index performance. Sharma notes that Big Tech’s AI spending is soaring at a pace that would be hard to justify without extremely optimistic assumptions about future returns, and that this surge is already putting pressure on growth-stock valuations across the market, a pattern he has highlighted in his analysis of AI bubble signs.
Other forecasters have gone further, putting a specific year on when they expect the turn to come. One strategist, writing under the banner “The AI,” has argued that the AI boom will turn to bust in 2026 and has even framed that call as a “trade of the year” for investors willing to bet on a reversal. In that view, the final full week of trading before the shift could mark a transition from what he dubs the “Return of Nasdog” era, where AI-linked tech stocks dominate, to a more sober market that rewards cash flow and balance sheet strength over grand narratives, a thesis laid out in detail in his 2026 bust forecast.
The 2026 crash thesis and the macro backdrop
Those timing calls are not happening in a vacuum. Macro researchers who focus on the intersection of interest rates and equity valuations have warned that the AI-fueled stock market bubble is likely to collide with a less forgiving rate environment around 2026. One research firm has argued that the AI-driven surge in stock prices will end in a crash that year, as higher borrowing costs and slower growth expose just how much of the rally was built on cheap money and speculative enthusiasm rather than durable earnings. Their work on the AI-fueled bubble links the timing of a potential break to the lagged impact of tighter monetary policy on corporate investment and consumer demand.
In that framework, the AI trade is particularly vulnerable because it is capital intensive and heavily front-loaded. Building data centers, training large models, and rolling out AI features across products like cloud platforms and productivity suites all require enormous up-front spending, with profitability often pushed years into the future. If rates stay higher for longer, or if growth slows more than expected, the discounted value of those distant cash flows shrinks quickly. That is exactly the kind of environment in which richly valued growth stories have historically struggled, and it helps explain why so many macro-oriented analysts see 2026 as a plausible window for a sharp repricing of AI-linked equities.
How investors can read the signal without overreacting
For individual investors, the temptation is either to ignore these warnings or to panic and dump anything with “AI” in the description. A more disciplined approach starts with recognizing what the issuance signal is actually saying. When a rising share of AI-related capital raising happens in private markets and secondary deals, it indicates that sophisticated players are eager to crystallize gains while public enthusiasm is still strong. That does not guarantee an imminent crash, but it does suggest that the easy phase of the trade, when insiders and outsiders were aligned in buying, is over. From here, I see every new AI stock sale, convertible deal, or late-stage funding round as a data point in a broader story about who is transferring risk to whom.
More from Morning Overview