Cosmology’s neat story of a universe driven apart by a simple, invisible “cosmic fuel” is starting to fray. A growing body of data suggests that dark energy, the ingredient thought to make up most of the cosmos, may not be a static background force after all, but something stranger and more dynamic. If that is true, the standard picture that has guided a generation of research will need more than a tune-up.
Instead of a tidy constant that quietly accelerates space forever, dark energy is emerging as an awkward, shape-shifting player that refuses to fit the equations that once seemed settled. I see that tension pushing cosmologists toward a more radical phase, where even gravity itself and the deepest ideas in fundamental physics are back on the drawing board.
The survey that shook the “cosmological constant”
The immediate shock to the field comes from a single, extraordinarily ambitious experiment: the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, or DESI. Mounted on a telescope in Arizona, DESI is designed to map tens of millions of galaxies and quasars in three dimensions, turning the sky into a vast statistical laboratory for how cosmic structure has grown over time, as described on the project’s own overview. By tracking how galaxies cluster and how ancient sound waves in the early universe imprinted a characteristic scale on that clustering, the collaboration can infer how fast space has been expanding at different epochs.
In its first major analysis, The DESI team used three years of observations to perform a detailed analysis of dark energy’s behavior across cosmic history. The results, which combine galaxy positions with measurements of those primordial sound waves, suggest that the influence of dark energy may have changed over time in unexpected ways, rather than remaining perfectly constant. That possibility directly challenges the long standing assumption that a single number in Einstein’s equations, the cosmological constant, has quietly governed the universe’s acceleration from the beginning to today.
Hints that dark energy is evolving, not fixed
What makes the DESI findings so disruptive is that they point toward dark energy that appears to evolve, perhaps even weaken, as the universe ages. A detailed survey of the collaboration’s early results reported that the data favor models in which the repulsive effect driving cosmic acceleration is not as strong now as it was billions of years ago. That trend, if it holds, would mean the universe’s expansion history bends away from the simple, ever faster trajectory predicted by a pure cosmological constant.
Independent coverage of the same work has emphasized that the DESI measurements are precise enough to seriously entertain the idea that dark energy is withering over time. A summary of the project’s conclusions notes that the DESI collaboration sees signs that dark energy is withering over time, rather than remaining perfectly steady. Another account of the same dataset from the University of Portsmouth highlights that New results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, or Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, indicate that dark energy might even be stronger now than it was in the distant past, depending on how the data are modeled. Taken together, these interpretations underline a single, uncomfortable point: the simplest picture of a perfectly constant dark energy is no longer the only game in town.
A crisis layered on top of the Hubble tension
The idea that dark energy itself might be changing arrives on top of an already serious headache for cosmologists, the so called “crisis in cosmology” around the Hubble constant. That crisis, often discussed in expert forums, centers on the fact that two main methods of measuring the universe’s expansion rate, one using the early universe and one using nearby galaxies, completely disagree with each other. That mismatch already hinted that something in the standard cosmological model, known as Lambda-CDM, might be missing or mis-specified.
Now, the suggestion that dark energy itself is not a simple constant deepens that unease. One influential analysis of the DESI results framed the situation starkly, arguing that if dark energy is weakening, then the textbook picture of a universe dominated by a fixed cosmological constant must be revised, as detailed in a feature titled Dark Energy May. A separate video explainer on the broader situation notes that physics just got a new problem and that the existing crisis in cosmology has only grown more severe, as highlighted in a Dec discussion of how multiple lines of evidence are now pulling the standard model in different directions at once.
Rethinking gravity and the fate of the universe
Once dark energy stops behaving like a simple constant, the next question is whether the underlying theory of gravity itself needs to change. Some researchers are already exploring that possibility, proposing that what looks like a mysterious fluid might instead be a sign that Einstein’s equations are only an approximation on the largest scales. A recent study argues that the accelerating expansion of the universe, usually attributed to dark energy, could instead be explained by a new formulation of gravity, as described in a report that notes The accelerating expansion of the universe might arise from a different mechanism driving the cosmic speed up.
That idea has been amplified in broader commentary that frames it as a potential overhaul of our basic picture of the cosmos. One analysis describes a New Theory of, presenting a geometric perspective in which the apparent acceleration is a manifestation of deeper spacetime structure rather than a separate dark energy component. At the same time, observers are revisiting the long term fate of the universe in light of evolving dark energy, with one account of the DESI results noting that the HETDEX project, or HETDEX, is focused on sound waves from the universe’s first 400,000 years to test whether dark energy might eventually reverse sign and lead to a cosmic collapse.
String theory, telescopes and the search for a new cosmic recipe
While observers wrestle with the data, theorists are trying to build models that can accommodate a more complicated dark energy. One of the most striking developments comes from string theory, which for years struggled to produce a universe with positive dark energy at all. Recent work has shown that it is now possible to construct a Universe That Has within the framework of String Theory Can Now Describe, Universe That Has Dark Energy, By Steve Nadis, overcoming earlier arguments that the theory only allowed a cosmos where the vacuum energy is either negative or zero. That shift opens the door to string based models in which dark energy can vary over time, potentially matching the evolving behavior hinted at by DESI.
At the observational frontier, other instruments are independently testing the same assumptions. The James Webb Space Telescope has already delivered measurements of distant galaxies and supernovae that strain the standard model, with one analysis noting that after two years in space, the telescope has effectively broken cosmology by challenging the simplest and most popular explanation that dark energy is a cosmological constant and the dominant contributor to the universe’s overall expansion. At the same time, astronomers are exploring evolving dark energy models more broadly, with one synthesis noting that Astronomers are rethinking the assumption that Einstein’s cosmic constant is fixed, and that New evidence has scientists reexamining that assumption in light of the latest data.
More from Morning Overview