On a small island in the Aare River, the world’s oldest operating nuclear power station is suddenly at the center of a national argument about risk, climate policy, and trust. The Beznau plant in northern Switzerland has supplied electricity for decades, but a string of technical problems and new lifetime extension plans are now colliding with a more anxious public mood. As the country rethinks its nuclear future, this aging facility has become a test case for how far Switzerland is willing to stretch the life of its most controversial infrastructure.
What happens at Beznau will resonate far beyond its concrete domes. The plant sits in a densely populated, highly industrialized region, and its fate is entangled with debates over new nuclear construction, river ecosystems, and the pace of decarbonization. I see in Beznau’s story a revealing snapshot of how even nuclear-friendly societies struggle when an old reactor keeps asking for more time.
Beznau’s unique place in the nuclear world
Beznau is not just another power station on the Swiss grid, it is the oldest nuclear plant still in commercial operation anywhere on the planet. The twin reactors on their artificial island in the Aare have been running for more than half a century, which gives the site an outsized symbolic weight in global arguments about how long nuclear technology can safely be pushed. Its location in the heart of Switzerland also means any mishap would unfold in a country that prides itself on engineering precision and direct democracy, a combination that amplifies scrutiny when things go wrong.
That symbolic status is sharpened by the fact that the oldest nuclear power plant in the world that is still operating is Beznau in Switzerland, with both units of the plant continuing to feed electricity into the grid even as many peers have already shut down. Reporting on the facility notes that the operator has no immediate plans to retire early, a stance that keeps Beznau in the spotlight as other countries wind down their oldest reactors. The plant’s longevity, and the decision to keep it running, are central to the growing controversy around its future, as highlighted in coverage of Beznau.
How a series of incidents shook local confidence
The recent backlash did not appear out of nowhere, it has been fueled by a sequence of technical incidents that chipped away at the plant’s reputation for quiet reliability. Earlier this year, Beznau went into an emergency shutdown after a failure in its connection to the power grid, a reminder that even if the reactor core is stable, the surrounding systems can still trigger abrupt stops. That event was followed by other operational hiccups that, taken together, have made the plant feel less like a background workhorse and more like a recurring headline.
One of the most politically sensitive episodes came when Block 2 of the plant was partly shut down due to what officials described as faulty manipulation, a human error that forced operators to take a reactor section offline. The report on this partial shutdown, which noted how the Swiss authorities were informed and how the issue was handled, underscored that even in a highly regulated environment, mistakes can slip through. The description of Block 2 being taken out of service due to faulty manipulation, and the broader context of how the Swiss government weighs such events, has become a touchstone for critics who argue that age and complexity are raising the odds of error.
Emergency shutdowns and the specter of evacuation
For residents around Beznau, the most unnerving moment came when an incident forced an evacuation of workers and triggered alarms that rippled through nearby communities. The emergency shutdown in early 2025, which followed a power grid connection failure, did not lead to a radiation release, but it did expose how quickly a routine day at the plant can turn into a high-stress scramble. In a country where sirens and drills are taken seriously, the idea that a single fault could empty parts of the facility has understandably rattled nerves.
Coverage of the public backlash notes that the emergency shutdown and evacuation have left people in the area worried about what might happen if a similar failure coincided with other stresses on the system. The account of how the incident forced an evacuation of staff and heightened anxiety among residents, framed as part of the broader public backlash, has become a rallying point for local campaigners. They argue that even if the technical risks remain low on paper, the psychological toll of living next to a plant that occasionally has to be cleared out is no longer acceptable.
Ageing hardware and the debate over reactor steel
Beyond the headline-grabbing incidents, a more technical argument is unfolding over what it means to run a nuclear reactor far beyond its original design life. Critics have zeroed in on the condition of Beznau’s reactor vessel, particularly the integrity of the steel that has been exposed to decades of neutron bombardment. They question whether inspections and modeling can fully capture how the material will behave under stress, especially in an emergency that pushes the system to its limits.
Reporting on the plant’s history of incidents notes that, despite the modern movement of nuclear power, there have been concerns about the steel of its reactor vessel and the implications of running such an old unit. The discussion of these incidents and the focus on reactor steel have fed into a broader narrative that Beznau is being asked to do more than it was ever meant to. Supporters counter that extensive testing and upgrades have kept the plant within safety margins, but the very need for such detailed justifications shows how age has become a political liability.
Operator ambitions: running beyond 60 years
While critics call for a clear retirement date, the plant’s owner is moving in the opposite direction, seeking to keep Beznau running well into the next decade and potentially beyond. The company has framed the plant as a crucial pillar of Swiss energy security, arguing that its steady output helps stabilize the grid as more intermittent renewables come online. In that narrative, shutting Beznau too soon would mean either importing more power or leaning harder on fossil fuels, both of which clash with climate goals.
According to the operator’s own account, extensive evaluation work has been carried out to justify longer operation, including detailed assessments of key components and safety systems. Based on these evaluations, Axpo has decided that Unit 2 will remain operational until 2032, with Unit 1 continuing until at least 2029, and has presented Beznau as an important contributor to Switzerland’s energy supply. The description of how Axpo used evaluation results to justify operation beyond 60 years is central to the company’s case that the plant can be both old and safe, even as opponents see those same numbers as evidence of mission creep.
Cooling water, hot summers, and the Aare ecosystem
Climate change is complicating the picture in ways that neither the plant’s designers nor its early critics fully anticipated. Beznau relies on the Aare River for cooling, and hotter, drier summers are pushing water temperatures closer to regulatory limits. When the river runs warm, the plant has to dial back output to avoid overheating the ecosystem, a tradeoff that exposes how nuclear power is not immune to the very climate stresses it is meant to help mitigate.
Earlier this summer, the operator reduced Beznau’s output because the Aare’s water temperature and flow conditions risked breaching environmental thresholds. The company explained that this measure serves to protect the Aare ecosystem and to comply with all environmental regulations, emphasizing that it was acting within requirements set by the authorities. The decision to cut power to safeguard the Aare has become part of the political conversation, with some residents asking whether a plant that must increasingly throttle back in heatwaves is still the reliable backbone it once was.
National policy whiplash: from phaseout to new build
Beznau’s local drama is unfolding against a backdrop of shifting national policy that would have seemed unlikely a decade ago. After the Fukushima Daiichi disaster, Switzerland announced a gradual nuclear phaseout, a decision that aligned with a broader European move away from atomic energy. Yet as the energy transition has collided with concerns about reliability and imports, the political center of gravity has started to move back toward nuclear, creating a more complex environment for debates about old plants like Beznau.
The federal government has now put forward legislation that would end the existing ban on new nuclear power plants, a step that supporters describe as essential for long term climate neutral planning. Advocates argue that lifting the ban would mark a major shift in Switzerland’s energy policy and that proponents see nuclear as needed alongside renewables to keep the lights on. The proposal to change the law, framed as Lifting the ban, has scrambled the politics around Beznau: some now argue that if Switzerland is serious about new reactors, it should be even more cautious about clinging to the very oldest one.
Public opinion: a nuclear-friendly country with sharp divides
Despite the protests around Beznau, Switzerland is not an anti nuclear outlier. Surveys show that a majority of the population now supports keeping nuclear in the mix, especially when the alternative is higher electricity prices or more dependence on neighboring grids. That broad acceptance, however, masks deep disagreements over how long specific plants should run and what conditions should trigger a shutdown.
A recent survey found that more than half of the Swiss population supports the government’s plan to remove the country’s ban on new nuclear power plants, a notable shift from the mood immediately after Fukushima Daiichi. Another opinion poll reported that At the same time, 38% of respondents are against nuclear power, while the remaining 8% do not know, highlighting a substantial minority that remains skeptical. The figures from the Swiss survey on new build and the poll noting that 38% oppose nuclear show a country that is broadly pragmatic about atomic energy but still sharply divided over its risks.
Renewables enthusiasm and the limits of solar alone
One reason nuclear has regained political traction is that enthusiasm for renewables, while strong, has run into practical constraints. Swiss voters and consumers overwhelmingly back rooftop solar, but they are also discovering that panels alone cannot carry the entire energy transition, especially in a mountainous country with long, dark winters. That realization has opened space for arguments that nuclear and renewables should be seen as partners rather than rivals.
Polling on energy attitudes shows that Enthusiasm for renewables remains high, but with caveats, and that Support for rooftop solar remains overwhelming (94%), even as people express concern about land use and grid integration. The report on how Enthusiasm for solar coexists with a renewed openness to nuclear helps explain why Beznau has not simply been written off as an outdated relic. Instead, it sits at the intersection of two powerful instincts: the desire to embrace clean technologies and the fear of giving up a proven source of baseload power before replacements are fully ready.
Extending Beznau to 2040 and the politics of longevity
Perhaps the most contentious development is the operator’s exploration of keeping Beznau running until 2040, a horizon that would make the plant an almost unprecedented experiment in nuclear longevity. For supporters, this is a rational way to squeeze more value out of an existing asset while new reactors and storage projects are still on the drawing board. For opponents, it looks like a risky bet that assumes the plant’s aging hardware and human systems can remain flawless for another decade and a half.
The Swiss power supply firm Axpo is currently examining whether the world’s oldest nuclear power plant in Beznau, Switzerland, can be made operational until 2040, a plan it has outlined as part of its long term strategy. The company’s announcement that The Swiss operator Axpo is studying operation until 2040 has galvanized local activists, who see it as proof that the plant will not quietly fade away. Their backlash is not only about safety, it is also about democratic control: they want a say in whether Beznau’s story ends in the 2030s or stretches into yet another generation.
Why Beznau’s fight matters beyond Switzerland
Beznau’s future is being argued in Swiss town halls and parliamentary committees, but the questions it raises are global. As more countries lean on nuclear power to decarbonize, they will face the same dilemma: whether to extend the lives of aging reactors or invest heavily in new designs. The world’s oldest operating plant offers an early glimpse of the social and political friction that comes with choosing the former path, especially when technical incidents and climate stresses start to pile up.
From the emergency shutdown tied to a grid fault to the partial closure of Block 2 after faulty manipulation, each new problem at Beznau has become a data point in a larger debate about how much risk societies are willing to tolerate in exchange for low carbon electricity. The plant’s defenders point to rigorous evaluations, strict oversight, and the need for stable baseload power, while critics highlight evacuation alarms, concerns over reactor steel, and the strain on the Aare. As I weigh those arguments, I see Beznau less as an outlier and more as a preview of the hard choices that await every country trying to keep the lights on without heating the planet, all while the public’s patience for aging nuclear hardware grows thinner.
More from MorningOverview