The FTC warns scammers are now spoofing its own phone number and texting fake badges

A caller ID showing the Federal Trade Commission’s own switchboard number is not proof that the agency is actually on the line. Federal investigators have documented a recovery scam in which fraudsters spoof that real number, then follow up with a text message containing a photo of a fabricated employee badge to convince a target that a stranger asking for money or account access is a legitimate government official.

How the Spoofed Number Gets Past Suspicion

Caller ID spoofing lets a scammer display almost any number on a recipient’s phone, including one that matches a federal agency’s published contact line. The Federal Trade Commission’s consumer alert on the scheme describes contact arriving unexpectedly, often through a text message or a messaging app such as WhatsApp rather than a phone call, from someone claiming to be an FTC employee or “agent.” Because the underlying technology to fake a number is cheap and widely available, seeing a familiar area code or a match against a publicly listed government line carries far less weight as proof of identity than most people assume.

Once contact is made, the scammer’s pitch centers on a specific prop: a photograph of what looks like an official employee identification card and badge. The FTC alert states plainly that both are fake, manufactured to look convincing on a phone screen where fine detail is hard to scrutinize. The image is designed to close the gap between a cold, unsolicited message and the kind of trust a real government credential would normally earn, and it arrives at the exact moment the target is deciding whether to keep talking or hang up.

Why the Pitch Is a Refund-and-Recovery Con, Not a Real Investigation

The hook in this particular scheme is recovery of money already lost to a previous scam. The impersonator claims the FTC can help retrieve funds, a promise that has no basis in how the agency actually operates. According to the FTC’s own description, the fake agent’s outreach is a variant of a refund and recovery scam, a category in which con artists specifically target people who have already been defrauded once, betting that the desire to undo a financial loss will override normal skepticism. Victims are asked to pay a fee, move money into an account the caller specifies, or hand over financial account details, none of which a real recovery process would ever require from the person being “helped.”

What a Real FTC Employee Will Never Do

The agency’s guidance lays out three specific behaviors that distinguish an impersonator from actual staff. A real FTC employee will not initiate contact by text message or a messaging app. A real FTC employee will not text a photo of an employee identification badge to “verify” who they are. And a real FTC employee will not offer to recover money lost in a scam in exchange for a payment, a wire transfer, or access to a bank account. Any message that combines an unexpected approach, a badge photo, and a request tied to moving money checks every box on that list simultaneously, which is itself the clearest signal that the message is fraudulent rather than official.

The mechanics here are not unique to the FTC. Spoofed caller ID paired with a fabricated credential photo is a template that shows up across impersonations of the Social Security Administration, the IRS, and local law enforcement, because the same cheap spoofing tools work against any agency’s public phone number. What sets a target up to fall for it is usually urgency: the message implies a limited window to act, discourages hanging up and calling the agency back through an independently verified number, and steers the conversation toward payment methods, such as wire transfers, gift cards, or cryptocurrency, that are difficult to reverse once sent.

Why the Payment Method Is the Real Tell

The fake badge photo and the spoofed number are stagecraft; the payment request is the actual objective, and the methods scammers push for are chosen specifically because they are hard to claw back. A wire transfer routed through a money-transfer company typically clears within minutes, long before a bank can flag it as suspicious. Gift cards are effectively cash the moment the numbers on the back are read aloud over the phone. Cryptocurrency transfers settle on a public ledger with no central authority able to reverse them. No legitimate government refund or recovery process depends on any of those three methods, which is why the FTC’s guidance treats a request for one of them as a bigger red flag than the spoofed number or the badge photo combined.

Someone who already wired funds, read off a gift card code, or shared a bank login believing they were speaking with a genuine FTC employee still has options, though the window to act narrows quickly. The agency’s own guidance on what to do after being scammed walks through contacting the bank or money-transfer company immediately to attempt a reversal or freeze, placing a fraud alert with the major credit bureaus if account numbers were exposed, and changing passwords on any account mentioned during the call. None of those steps require paying a third party for help, which is itself worth remembering, since a second caller offering to “recover” funds for a fee is frequently the same scam repeating itself on the same victim.

Reporting an Impersonator and Recovering After a Loss

Anyone who receives one of these messages, or who already sent money or information to someone claiming to be a federal employee, can file a report at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. The FTC uses these reports to track scam patterns and warn the public, even though the agency does not promise individual case-by-case recovery of lost funds, which is precisely the promise the impersonators are exploiting. The most reliable way to confirm whether a contact is genuine remains the same regardless of which agency is named: hang up, look up the agency’s official number independently, and call that number directly rather than trusting anything provided by the person who reached out first.

This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by Morning Overview editors prior to publication.

More from Morning Overview