Every summer, public health agencies warn about heat waves, and every summer, the death toll still catches communities off guard. The reason may be that official alerts focus almost entirely on temperature while overlooking a second, simultaneous threat: ground-level ozone, an invisible pollutant that spikes precisely when extreme heat arrives. This gap in public messaging is one of the most consequential blind spots in disaster preparedness, because the two hazards do not simply add up; they appear to multiply each other’s lethality in ways that standard heat advisories fail to capture.
How Heat Cooks Up a Second Killer
Most people associate ozone with the protective layer high in the atmosphere. Ground-level ozone is a different substance with a different origin story. It forms when nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, pollutants released by vehicles, power plants, and industrial operations, undergo photochemical reactions driven by heat and sunlight. The hotter and sunnier the day, the faster those reactions proceed, which means ozone concentrations climb in lockstep with the thermometer. On a mild spring afternoon, the same mix of tailpipe and smokestack emissions might produce moderate ozone. During a multi-day heat wave, those emissions can generate hazardous levels that blanket entire metropolitan regions.
This is not a minor irritant. Ozone inflames airways, reduces lung function, and stresses the cardiovascular system, especially in people who already have asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or heart disease. For children, outdoor workers, older adults, and others with underlying conditions, breathing elevated ozone during a heat wave means the body is fighting on two fronts at once. The lungs are trying to shed heat through rapid breathing while simultaneously absorbing a gas that damages their lining. That collision is what makes the combination so dangerous, and it is exactly the scenario that current heat alert systems tend to treat as two separate problems, if they address air quality at all.
When Heat and Ozone Strike Together, Deaths Multiply
A peer-reviewed analysis in Atmospheric Environment used a time-stratified case-crossover design with cause-specific mortality data to quantify what happens when extreme heat events and elevated ozone overlap. The researchers found that mortality risk during those combined episodes exceeded the sum of each hazard’s individual toll. In plain terms, if heat alone raises the death rate by a certain margin and ozone alone raises it by another, the two together push it higher than those margins combined. This more-than-additive effect suggests the human body reaches a tipping point when heat stress and airway inflammation hit simultaneously, overwhelming the ability to compensate through sweating, increased heart rate, and faster breathing.
That finding aligns with what federal agencies have been signaling. Modeling work by the Environmental Protection Agency on the so-called climate penalty indicates that warming trends and heat waves can worsen ozone air quality and increase deaths attributable to air pollution exposure, even if emissions of the precursor chemicals stay flat or decline. In other words, progress on tailpipe and smokestack regulations could be partially erased by rising temperatures alone. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reinforces this connection in its extreme heat guidance, noting that warmer temperatures can mean higher ozone levels and advising the public to check air quality forecasts, especially people with asthma or lung disease. Yet that advice is typically buried deep in heat safety pages rather than featured in the bold-type warnings most people actually see on their phones or highway message boards.
The 2021 Pacific Northwest Heat Dome as a Case Study
The June 26 to July 2, 2021 heat wave that struck the Pacific Northwest offers a grim illustration of how these risks converge. Washington State’s Department of Health compiled a final tally of heat-related deaths with demographic breakdowns showing that older adults and certain counties bore a disproportionate share of fatalities. A peer-reviewed synthesis in Nature Communications mapped the catastrophe across British Columbia, Alberta, Washington, and Oregon, noting that official death estimates continued to evolve as jurisdictions updated their records. The sheer geographic breadth of the event, spanning two countries and multiple climate zones, made it one of the most studied heat disasters in recent North American history and a stark preview of the kinds of compound hazards climate change is expected to intensify.
What the mortality data alone cannot fully explain is why certain days and certain neighborhoods saw sharper spikes than others. Temperature variation is part of the answer, but air chemistry likely played a role as well. Cities concentrate both heat and pollution sources: for more than 200 years, researchers have documented that urban areas run hotter than surrounding rural land, a phenomenon now widely recognized as the urban heat island effect. That same density of roads, buildings, and industrial activity also supplies the precursor pollutants that cook into ozone, especially when stagnant high-pressure systems trap air in place. The result is a feedback loop: the places where the most people live are also the places where heat and ozone reinforce each other most aggressively. Health systems tracking the 2021 event, including agencies like the Washington Medical Commission and the state’s nursing regulators, faced surges that strained clinical capacity, yet post-event reviews have largely focused on cooling centers and hydration rather than air quality interventions such as cleaner backup power, portable filtration, or targeted messaging about staying indoors during peak ozone hours.
Why Nighttime Heat Extends the Danger Window
One underappreciated dimension is that heat waves do not stop killing when the sun goes down. Nighttime temperatures that remain unusually high prevent the body from recovering from daytime stress, particularly in homes without air conditioning or adequate ventilation. When the mercury fails to drop, heart rate and core temperature stay elevated, sleep is disrupted, and people with chronic conditions have less physiological reserve to handle the next day’s heat. In many cities, the urban heat island effect keeps nighttime temperatures several degrees warmer than surrounding areas, stretching the danger window from a few peak afternoon hours into a nearly continuous, multi-day assault on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems.
Ozone behaves differently after dark, generally declining as the chemical reactions that create it slow in the absence of sunlight. But the damage it inflicts during the day carries into the night, especially for people whose lungs are already inflamed. Someone who spends the afternoon in high ozone may experience coughing, chest tightness, or shortness of breath that worsens overnight in a hot bedroom. For older adults living alone or outdoor workers returning to crowded, uncooled housing, the combination of lingering respiratory irritation and unrelenting heat can be deadly. This temporal mismatch (daytime ozone peaks followed by nighttime heat stress) means that official advisories focusing on daytime maximum temperatures and hourly air quality index readings may underestimate the cumulative risk people face over the full 24-hour cycle of a heat wave.
Building Smarter Alerts for a Two-Headed Threat
Recognizing the intertwined nature of heat and ozone should change how communities design warning systems and emergency responses. Instead of issuing separate heat advisories and air quality alerts that may or may not overlap in time, public agencies could develop integrated “compound hazard” alerts that explicitly flag days when both temperature and ozone are expected to reach dangerous levels. Those alerts could trigger specific actions: adjusting outdoor work schedules, opening cooling centers with filtered air rather than simple fans, and prioritizing wellness checks for people with respiratory or cardiac disease. Health departments could also coordinate with transportation and environmental agencies to temporarily reduce emissions during forecasted heat-ozone episodes, for example by limiting certain industrial activities or encouraging remote work.
Public messaging needs an upgrade as well. Many people now receive weather notifications through smartphone apps, social media, and push alerts from local news outlets. Embedding air quality information directly into those channels, rather than relegating it to a separate website, would make it far more likely that vulnerable residents understand when they should stay indoors, avoid strenuous activity, or use air conditioning and filtration if available. Clinicians and public health nurses can play a role by counseling patients with asthma, COPD, and heart disease about the combined risks of heat and ozone, emphasizing practical steps like checking daily forecasts, keeping rescue inhalers close at hand, and planning errands or outdoor exercise for early morning hours when both temperature and ozone tend to be lower. As climate change drives more frequent and intense heat waves, treating heat and ozone as a single, two-headed threat rather than parallel problems will be essential to preventing avoidable deaths.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
