Africa’s great rainforests were long treated as a quiet ally in the climate fight, soaking up vast quantities of carbon dioxide and helping to steady a warming planet. New research now shows that balance has flipped, with large swaths of African forest releasing more carbon than they store and accelerating the very crisis they once helped contain. The shift is not a distant warning but a present reality, driven by human pressure on some of the world’s most carbon‑dense ecosystems.
The finding that African rainforests have become a net source of emissions forces a hard reset on global climate planning and on how I think about the continent’s role in stabilizing the atmosphere. It exposes the limits of relying on nature to quietly offset fossil fuel pollution while deforestation, degradation and industrial expansion continue largely unchecked.
From global carbon sponge to net emitter
For years, scientists described Africa’s forests as a crucial carbon sponge, responsible for roughly one fifth of the planet’s natural carbon removal and acting as a brake on rising greenhouse gases. That picture has changed dramatically, with a new analysis concluding that Africa’s forests have shifted from absorbing carbon to generating it, a reversal that undercuts assumptions baked into climate models and national pledges. The continent’s forests, once counted as a dependable buffer, are now adding to the atmospheric load they were supposed to ease, a transformation that researchers describe as both rapid and structurally driven.
The latest work finds that Africa’s forests are no longer reliable carbon sinks because they are losing more biomass than they recover, a sign that tree loss and degradation are outpacing regrowth across vast areas. One assessment reports that Africa’s forests have been transformed from a carbon sink to a carbon source, with net emissions comparable to the annual exhaust of about 106 million cars, a figure that captures the scale of the shift in a single, stark comparison. That same research shows that the forests’ carbon balance has tipped since around 2010, turning what was once a quiet climate service into a growing liability for efforts to keep global warming within agreed limits.
African rainforests at the heart of the problem
The most dramatic changes are unfolding in the tropical rainforests that stretch across central and western Africa, including the Congo Basin and other moist broadleaf regions that historically stored enormous amounts of carbon in dense vegetation and deep soils. These African rainforests, which once played a significant role in absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, are now releasing more carbon than they take in, according to a study that tracks how warming, logging and land conversion have eroded their capacity to act as long‑term reservoirs. The finding is especially troubling because these forests were often portrayed as a counterpart to the Amazon, a second great green lung of the planet that could be counted on to keep drawing down emissions.
Researchers report that the worst affected areas include tropical moist broadleaf forests in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Madagascar and neighboring regions, where tree loss and degradation have pushed ecosystems past a tipping point. In these landscapes, the balance between growth and decay has shifted so that more carbon is being released through logging, fire and decomposition than is being locked away in new wood and soil. The result is that African rainforests, once a cornerstone of global carbon storage, have effectively flipped into net emitters, undermining the assumption that they would continue to offset a significant share of fossil fuel pollution for decades to come.
What the new Nature study actually shows
The core of the new evidence comes from a detailed analysis published in Nature that tracks how African forests have moved from being carbon sinks to net emitters over roughly the past decade. The study combines satellite observations with ground measurements to show that Africa’s forests, which previously absorbed more carbon than they released, now emit more carbon than they store, a reversal that aligns with independent warnings from climate scientists and conservation groups. By quantifying this shift, the Nature research provides a hard number for what had been an emerging concern, confirming that the continent’s forests are no longer a reliable offset for rising emissions elsewhere.
According to reporting on the Nature work, the study found that Africa’s forests have become net sources of carbon, a change that directly undermines the land‑use assumptions embedded in climate strategies adopted at COP26 in 2021. The analysis shows that Africa’s forests, savannahs and other wooded landscapes are collectively losing their ability to function as long‑term carbon stores, with the forests themselves now classified as net emitters. That conclusion is echoed in other summaries that describe how Africa’s forests have officially flipped from absorbing carbon to releasing it, a finding that reinforces the Nature study’s central message that the continent’s tree cover can no longer be treated as a stable, passive ally in the climate system.
Inside the science: biomass loss and a flipped carbon balance
At the heart of this shift is a simple but devastating equation: Africa’s forests are losing more biomass than they recover, which means more carbon is leaving the system than entering it through new growth. Biomass here refers to the living material in trees and other vegetation, and when that material is cut, burned or degraded, the carbon it contains is released into the atmosphere. A recent assessment explains that Africa’s forests are no longer carbon sinks because they lose more biomass than they regain, a pattern that has turned them into net sources of emissions rather than long‑term stores.
Scientists involved in the research, including Professor Heiko Balzter and Dr Nezha Acil of the University of Leicester, have described how the continent’s forests once absorbed more carbon than they emitted but that human activity has since tipped the balance. Their work, conducted with colleagues at the University of Leicester and partner institutions, shows that the combination of deforestation, degradation and climate stress has pushed many forest systems past a threshold where regrowth can no longer keep up with losses. That conclusion is reinforced by broader syntheses that summarize how Africa’s forests have switched from absorbing to emitting carbon, with particular emphasis on the destruction of carbon‑dense rainforest that once anchored the continent’s role as a global carbon sink.
Drivers: deforestation, degradation and industrial expansion
The flip from sink to source is not a mystery of natural cycles but the result of identifiable human pressures that have intensified over time. Across Africa, forests are being cleared for agriculture, logged for timber and fuel, and fragmented by roads, mines and settlements, each of which chips away at the integrity of ecosystems that evolved to store carbon over centuries. Analyses of the new findings stress that the destruction of carbon‑dense rainforest is a primary driver of the shift, with forest loss and degradation eroding the very structures that made these landscapes such powerful carbon reservoirs in the first place.
In the Congo Basin, which has long been described as the world’s largest forest carbon sink, industrial expansion is colliding directly with conservation goals. More than a quarter, an estimated 27 percent, of the region’s intact forests now overlap with mining permits, a level of exposure that raises alarms about the potential impact on surrounding ecosystems and the carbon they hold. This overlap, described in detail in investigations into mining the forest, illustrates how decisions about resource extraction are effectively decisions about the climate, since each new concession in intact forest risks turning another piece of a global carbon sink into a source of emissions.
Beyond rainforests: savannahs and wider African landscapes
While the headline focus is on rainforests, the new research makes clear that the problem extends across a wider set of African landscapes, including savannahs and mixed forest‑savannah mosaics. These ecosystems, which cover vast areas and support millions of people, have also shifted from acting as carbon sinks to becoming sources, largely because of land‑use change and degradation. Reporting on the findings notes that Africa’s forests and savannahs have switched from carbon sinks to sources, with emissions from forest loss and degradation now outweighing the carbon absorbed by remaining trees and vegetation.
This broader perspective matters because it shows that the continent’s carbon balance cannot be understood by looking only at dense rainforest cores while ignoring the surrounding matrix of woodlands, savannahs and secondary forests. As land is cleared for crops, grazing and infrastructure, and as fire regimes change, these landscapes release stored carbon and reduce the capacity of the region as a whole to act as a net absorber. Analysts like Chris Bonasia have highlighted how emissions from forest loss and degradation across these varied ecosystems are now a significant component of Africa’s overall climate footprint, underscoring that any solution must address the full mosaic of land uses rather than focusing solely on iconic rainforest blocks.
Regional hotspots: Congo Basin, Madagascar and beyond
Within this continental picture, certain regions stand out as hotspots where the shift from sink to source is especially pronounced. The tropical moist broadleaf forests of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Madagascar and neighboring areas have been identified as among the worst affected, with high rates of tree loss and degradation undermining their historic role as carbon strongholds. These forests, which once stored immense quantities of carbon in towering canopies and rich soils, are now contributing to atmospheric emissions as logging, agriculture and infrastructure expansion eat into their remaining intact areas.
The Congo Basin in particular has drawn attention because it was long celebrated as a stable carbon sink even as other tropical forests showed signs of weakening. Recent investigations into why the region is at risk point to the rapid spread of mining concessions, road building and other industrial activities that fragment habitats and open previously remote areas to further exploitation. When more than a quarter of intact forest overlaps with mining permits, as current estimates suggest, the risk is not only to biodiversity and local communities but also to the global climate, since each hectare of disturbed forest represents carbon that could be released rather than stored for the long term.
Why this upends global climate plans
The discovery that African forests are now net emitters of carbon has profound implications for global climate planning, which has often relied on optimistic assumptions about the capacity of tropical forests to offset fossil fuel pollution. Many national climate strategies, including those referenced in agreements adopted at COP26, counted on continued carbon uptake by forests in Africa and elsewhere to help close the gap between current emissions and the cuts needed to meet temperature goals. The new evidence that Africa’s forests have become net sources of carbon means that those plans rest on a foundation that is already eroding, forcing a reassessment of how much nature can realistically compensate for continued fossil fuel use.
Climate analysts have warned that Africa’s forests, which were responsible for roughly one fifth of global carbon removal, are beginning to generate emissions instead, a reversal that makes it harder to meet climate goals without deeper cuts in fossil fuel burning. Social media summaries of the research have underscored that Africa’s forests have shifted from absorbing carbon to emitting it, stressing that this change undermines the land‑based mitigation potential that many governments and companies have built into their net‑zero pledges. In practical terms, the flip from sink to source means that policymakers can no longer assume that protecting existing forests alone will be enough; they must also confront the reality that degraded forests are already adding to the problem and that rapid restoration and emission cuts are both required.
Money, markets and the race to pay for standing forests
As the science has grown more alarming, attention has turned to whether new financial tools can make forests worth more standing than felled, especially in regions where short‑term economic pressures drive deforestation. One of the most closely watched ideas is the Tropical Forests Forever Facility, or TFFF, a proposed mechanism designed to channel long‑term funding into countries that preserve or restore their tropical forests. For Symons and other advocates, the TFFF represents a shift from promises to delivery, with the facility structured to reward governments and communities that keep forests intact rather than clearing them for quick cash.
Brazil is set to play a central role in this emerging architecture, with plans to launch the TFFF at COP30 as a new approach to unlock conservation funding at the scale required to matter. Context reporting explains that Brazil intends the TFFF to support global forest conservation, with countries that protect their forests receiving sustained financial flows rather than one‑off grants. Additional briefings on how the TFFF works describe how investments will prioritize sustainable activities that support the preservation and recovery of tropical forests, including measures that help local communities benefit from keeping trees standing. If such mechanisms can be made robust and equitable, they could offer a lifeline for African countries whose forests are under pressure but whose budgets are stretched thin.
Can policy and public pressure still turn the tide?
The grim science does not mean the situation is irreversible, but it does narrow the window for action and raise the stakes for policy choices made in the next few years. Environmental advocates argue that halting deforestation and degradation in Africa will require a mix of stronger domestic regulation, better enforcement, and international support that recognizes the global value of the continent’s forests. Investigations into mining and other industrial drivers in the Congo Basin, for example, show that clear rules about where extraction can occur, combined with transparency about permits and enforcement of environmental safeguards, can reduce the pressure on intact forests if political will exists.
Public awareness is also playing a role, with climate communities amplifying the findings that Africa’s forests have switched from absorbing to emitting carbon and highlighting the responsibility of wealthy countries and corporations in driving demand for commodities linked to deforestation. Commenters on platforms like Economy‑focused forums have stressed that the destruction of carbon‑dense rainforest is not an inevitable byproduct of development but a consequence of specific policy and market choices that can be changed. At the same time, explanatory videos and updates on how Africa’s forests have turned from sinks to sources are helping to translate complex science into accessible narratives, making it harder for decision‑makers to ignore the warning that one of the planet’s great natural climate defenses is now working in reverse.
Rethinking how we count on nature
The revelation that African rainforests now emit more carbon than they absorb forces a broader reckoning with how I, and many policymakers, have thought about nature in climate strategies. For years, it was tempting to treat forests as a kind of moral offset, a way to balance the books while the world struggled to cut fossil fuel use at the necessary speed. The new data from Africa shows the limits of that approach: when forests are degraded, logged and fragmented, their ability to act as carbon sinks collapses, and the supposed offset becomes an additional source of emissions instead.
Analyses that describe how African forests have officially flipped, instead of absorbing carbon they are now releasing it, capture this uncomfortable truth in blunt terms and ask readers to consider who bears responsibility for the change. The answer lies in a web of local and global forces, from land‑use decisions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Madagascar to international demand for minerals, timber and agricultural commodities. If there is a lesson in the new research, it is that counting on forests to save us while allowing them to be chipped away by unchecked development is a dangerous illusion. Protecting and restoring African forests can still deliver enormous climate benefits, but only if paired with rapid cuts in fossil fuel emissions and a serious effort to make standing trees more valuable than the alternatives that currently replace them.
More from MorningOverview