Iran’s sweeping internet blackout has collided with the world’s most prominent satellite network, turning Starlink from a symbol of borderless connectivity into a live test of how far a state will go to keep its citizens offline. What is unfolding is not just another censorship story but a trial of strength between low‑orbit satellites and high‑end jamming gear that could redefine the risks of relying on space for free expression.
As Jan unrest spreads and authorities escalate their response, Iran’s ability to disrupt Starlink at scale is forcing technologists, activists, and governments to confront a new reality: satellite internet can be treated as a battlefield, and the rules of engagement are being rewritten in real time.
The blackout that turned Starlink into a battlefield
The latest wave of protests in Iran has unfolded under what local observers describe as a “digital siege,” with the state cutting international traffic and throttling domestic services to choke off organizing and reporting. According to Digital Siege, the current Internet Blackout Works as a multilayered campaign, combining legal pressure, infrastructure control, and targeted repression in a way that explains Why This Time Looks Different for How Iran manages information. In that context, Starlink’s promise of bypassing terrestrial choke points turned it into both a lifeline and a lightning rod.
Earlier shutdowns in 2022 had already shown Iranian officials how satellite links could act as “informational oxygen,” sustaining nationwide mobilisation when other channels were cut. Reporting on Starlink notes that this perception shifted the service from a civilian technology into a national security target inside Iran’s planning. Once terminals began reappearing during the latest protests, the state treated them not as consumer gadgets but as hostile infrastructure to be hunted, jammed, and, where possible, physically removed.
How Iran is jamming a low‑orbit giant
To understand why Starlink is suddenly vulnerable, it helps to look at the physics. Starlink satellites orbit the Earth at an altitude of 550 kilometres, close enough that They can offer low‑latency broadband but also close enough that powerful ground transmitters can overwhelm the signal. Analysts say Iran is likely using mobile jammers that mimic techniques first seen in Russia’s campaigns against satellite links, saturating the frequencies that Starlink dishes rely on and causing packet loss or complete outages across wide areas.
Reports on how Iran likely using describe trucks and portable systems that can be moved around cities to track and disrupt clusters of terminals, making normal browsing effectively impossible. Another analysis of how Iran could be notes that these tactics mirror Russian methods, with Jan officials apparently drawing on battlefield lessons from Ukraine to refine their own electronic warfare playbook. The result is a cat‑and‑mouse contest in which every software tweak by Starlink is met with new interference patterns from the ground.
Russian and Chinese tech behind a new kind of “kill switch”
Iran’s jamming capacity did not appear overnight. Security experts say the disruption of Starlink likely relies on acquired Chinese or Russian technology, giving the state access to military‑grade emitters and signal processing tools that can target specific bands used by the constellation. Coverage of how the Starlink disruption likely on Chinese and Russian systems underscores that this is not improvised censorship but a deliberate investment in electronic warfare. President Donald Trump has publicly vowed to speak to Elon Musk to restore connectivity, a sign that Washington now treats satellite jamming as a geopolitical issue rather than a purely technical one.
As unrest spreads across Iran and authorities tighten controls on communication, news reports suggest that the government is using Russian jammers to degrade Starlink links in protest hotspots. Another account describes how, Just hours after signs that the jamming and packet loss situation in Tehran had eased, Iran launched what analysts called the first full electronic warfare strike on Musk’s network, targeting both satellites and user terminals with coordinated interference. That report on Tehran describes a dangerous game of cat and mouse, with Starlink engineers pushing updates while Iranian operators adjust their jamming profiles in near real time.
From lifeline to hunted network on the ground
For people inside Iran, the battle is not abstract. Starlink has become a literal lifeline for protesters, journalists, and families trying to reach the outside world, but every dish is also a beacon that can draw security forces. One report notes that Satellite hunting teams from Iranian security services are using radio‑frequency scanners and GPS tools to locate and confiscate terminals, turning rooftops and safe houses into high‑risk assets. Another account describes how But Starlink receivers use GPS to locate and enable connections to satellites, which in turn makes them vulnerable to spoofing and interference; as one analysis of GPS notes, this positioning data can be manipulated or blocked to create a de facto “kill switch” for entire regions.
On the streets, the crackdown is increasingly physical. A widely shared video clip shows that 39 likes were recorded on a post describing how Iran Cracks Down on Satellite and Starlink Internet Equipment, with security forces seizing terminals from homes and businesses. Another report details how Iran ‘SEIZES’ Thousands of US‑Linked Devices as part of a nationwide sweep, with Iran framing the crackdown as a defense against foreign interference. Many Iranians have responded by disguising their dishes as solar panels or air‑conditioning units, with one account quoting Ahmadian explaining that Many Iranians resort to such tactics because, After earlier efforts to shut down communications during the 12‑day war with Israel, authorities learned how to block Starlink more broadly and now treat visible hardware as contraband.
A global warning for satellite internet’s future
What is happening in Iran is already rippling far beyond its borders. In Myanmar, Sudan, and other conflict zones, Starlink has become critical infrastructure for rebels, aid workers, and journalists who rely on it when terrestrial networks are cut. A detailed account of how, In Myanmar, Sudan, and elsewhere, Starlink became synonymous with resistance to internet censorship and digital rights, argues that Iran’s success in crippling the network should worry every group that has come to see low‑orbit satellites as a guaranteed backdoor to the web. If one state can treat Starlink as a military target and largely get away with it, others may follow.
The technical contest is evolving quickly. Analysts note that Iran could be blocking Starlink during its current internet blackout with methods similar to Russia, and that Iran is now in its sixth day of a sweeping shutdown linked to its 12‑Day‑War with Israel, with Starlink users facing both legal penalties and targeted interference. Another report notes that, In addition to the ongoing total ban on international internet traffic, the government also initially blocked international phone calls and has deployed tools that can detect satellite usage and can slow it down, according to Jan coverage of Starlink’s role as a fragile lifeline. Moreover, in the cat and mouse game between internet‑providers and regimes like Iran, Starlink has now pushed an update that makes it harder to locate terminals, but Moreover experts warn that Iran and other states will keep searching for another way to jam internet access, whether through GPS spoofing, more powerful emitters, or new legal tools that criminalize satellite use outright.
More from Morning Overview