Elon Musk has spent years dangling the prospect of a blockbuster SpaceX listing, with investors salivating over talk of a 2026 IPO that could value the rocket maker at up to $1.5 trillion. Now venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya is arguing that the long-awaited debut might never happen in the conventional way. In his telling, the public market dream for SpaceX could instead be folded into Tesla through a reverse merger that rewrites the playbook for how Musk’s empire taps Wall Street.
Palihapitiya’s contrarian bet on a Tesla–SpaceX mash‑up
Chamath Palihapitiya has built a reputation on bold calls, and his latest centers on the idea that SpaceX may never ring the opening bell on its own. He has argued that SpaceX may “May Skip IPO In Favor Of Tesla Reverse Merger,” positioning a combination with Tesla as a more likely path than a traditional listing and framing it as a classic Contrarian Bet on how Musk prefers to operate. In his view, the same instincts that led Musk to shun short term guidance at Tesla and keep other ventures private could push him to use Tesla’s existing stock as the gateway for public investors to own SpaceX at scale.
Palihapitiya’s thesis rests on the notion that Musk values control and strategic flexibility more than the optics of a record-breaking IPO. By merging SpaceX into Tesla, Musk could, in theory, preserve tight grip over his broader ecosystem while still unlocking liquidity for long time insiders and employees. The investor has suggested that such a move would be consistent with Musk’s history of using one platform to accelerate another, pointing to the way Tesla’s brand has helped elevate projects like Neuralink and The Boring Company within a shared narrative of radical engineering.
The $1.5 trillion question hanging over a 2026 IPO
The tension in Palihapitiya’s argument is that it runs directly against the market’s expectation of a blockbuster SpaceX float. Reporting earlier this year indicated that SpaceX is rumored to target a 2026 IPO at valuations as high as $1.5 trillion, a figure that would instantly place it among the most valuable companies on the market. Those expectations have been fueled by the rapid growth of Starlink, the company’s satellite internet business, and by a steady cadence of fundraising rounds that have pushed private valuations higher. For institutional investors who have been locked out of those rounds, a direct IPO at that scale is the cleanest way to finally gain exposure.
Yet even as those numbers circulate, there are signs of internal debate about whether a conventional listing is the right move. The same reporting that floated the $1.5 trillion figure also noted that SpaceX was last valued at lofty levels in private markets, reflecting investor faith in Musk’s ability to commercialize everything from reusable rockets to global broadband. That context helps explain why Palihapitiya’s suggestion of a reverse merger has landed with such force: if the company is already treated as a crown jewel in private portfolios, the pressure to stage a headline-grabbing IPO may be weaker than the pressure to find a structure that keeps Musk’s strategic options open.
Musk’s own signals on timing and valuation
Complicating the picture further are Musk’s public comments about taking SpaceX to market. In Dec, he was cited by Jakarta based Gotrade News as finally confirming plans for a SpaceX IPO in 2026, with a target valuation of $1 trillion. That figure is lower than the $1.5 trillion number circulating in some investor circles, but still implies one of the largest offerings in history and underscores how central Starlink has become to the company’s equity story. Musk has framed the satellite network as a cash engine that can help fund ambitious projects like Mars missions and next generation launch systems.
At the same time, other coverage has stressed that, When analysts ask “When is the SpaceX IPO date,” the only firm answer is that, As of December, there is still no officially confirmed IPO timetable from the company itself. However, investor chatter and Musk’s own hints have created a sense of inevitability around a 2026 window, even if the exact structure remains fluid. That ambiguity is precisely the space where Palihapitiya’s reverse merger scenario lives: Musk can talk about going public in broad terms while still reserving the right to choose a path that looks very different from a standard New York or Nasdaq debut.
Why a reverse merger could appeal to Musk and Tesla
To understand why Palihapitiya thinks a Tesla combination is more than a thought experiment, it helps to look at how Musk has historically used Tesla as a financial and cultural anchor. Tesla already trades as a high beta technology stock, with investors accustomed to funding long dated projects like the Cybertruck, the 4680 battery program, and the rollout of Full Self Driving software. Folding SpaceX into that story could give Musk a way to present a unified narrative of terrestrial and orbital technology under one ticker, while using Tesla’s existing shareholder base as the capital pool for future launches and satellite deployments.
There are also governance and control angles that make a reverse merger attractive on paper. By steering SpaceX into Tesla rather than floating it separately, Musk could potentially avoid the dilution and additional oversight that a standalone IPO would bring. Investor Chamath Palihapitiya has argued that SpaceX’s management and advisers are likely weighing exactly these trade offs, with some seeing a Tesla tie up as a way to keep Musk’s influence intact across both companies. For Tesla, acquiring SpaceX would instantly diversify revenue beyond electric vehicles and energy storage, giving the Company exposure to launch services, defense contracts, and subscription internet through Starlink.
Why skeptics still see a classic IPO as more likely
Not everyone is convinced that Musk will actually pull the trigger on a Tesla–SpaceX merger, despite the intellectual appeal. Some analysts point out that SpaceX has already built a distinct brand and customer base, from NASA and commercial launch clients to Starlink subscribers in rural communities, that might be better served by a clean, standalone listing. They argue that public market investors are prepared to underwrite a pure play space and satellite business at premium multiples, especially if the IPO is framed as a once in a generation chance to own the infrastructure behind global connectivity and deep space exploration.
Other investors stress that the signals around a traditional IPO remain strong. One report framed the SpaceX IPO as Unlikely only in the sense that Investor Predicts Tesla Reverse Merger Instead, highlighting that this is still a minority view even among Musk watchers. Another noted that Investor Chamath Palihapitiya is effectively betting that SpaceX will avoid a direct IPO that could be the largest in history, a stance that underscores how dramatic such a move would be. Meanwhile, separate coverage has reiterated that SpaceX will not go for IPO in the near term only if Musk decides that a Tesla route better serves his long range plans, a caveat that keeps the door open to a more conventional outcome if market conditions and internal priorities align.
What it would mean for retail investors and Musk’s empire
For ordinary investors, the structure Musk ultimately chooses will determine how accessible SpaceX becomes. A straightforward IPO would allow anyone with a brokerage account or trading app to buy shares directly, mirroring the way Tesla stock became a staple in portfolios from Robinhood to traditional wealth managers. A reverse merger, by contrast, would make Tesla the de facto vehicle for owning SpaceX, rewarding existing shareholders while forcing newcomers to accept exposure to both businesses at once. That could appeal to fans who already see Musk’s ventures as a single ecosystem, but it might deter investors who want to separate their bets on rockets from their views on electric cars.
There are also broader implications for how Musk structures his corporate universe. If SpaceX is ultimately folded into Tesla, it would reinforce a pattern in which Musk keeps Neuralink and The Boring Company private while using one flagship public entity as the umbrella for his most capital intensive projects. A detailed report on SpaceX’s valuation noted that the company was last valued at high levels in private markets, with investors treating it as the crown jewel among Musk’s holdings alongside Neuralink and The Boring Company, a status that gives him significant leverage in choosing his path. Another analysis of the SpaceX IPO prospects emphasized that, When investors look at the IPO landscape, they see Musk as a unique case who can afford to wait, As of December, for the structure that best aligns with his ambitions. However, until Musk himself spells out the plan, Palihapitiya’s reverse merger scenario will remain a provocative, if unverified, blueprint for how the most anticipated space IPO in history could simply vanish into Tesla’s already volatile stock.
More from Morning Overview