In much of the country, brushing snow off the windshield used to feel like a courtesy, not a legal requirement. That is changing as more states decide that leaving a frozen “snow-hawk” on your roof is not just sloppy, it is a ticketable safety risk. A growing patchwork of laws now makes it clear that in some places, failing to clear your car can cost you real money.
I see a clear trend behind these rules: lawmakers are treating chunks of ice and snow flying off moving vehicles as preventable crashes, not freak accidents. Eleven states now have specific statutes targeting snow and ice on vehicles, and several others use broader traffic laws to punish drivers after debris causes damage or injury.
How snow on your car turned into a legal problem
The basic safety concern is simple. When a sedan or SUV heads onto the highway with several inches of powder on the roof, that snow can harden into ice and peel off in sheets at 65 miles per hour. Drivers in front suddenly face a whiteout, while those behind can be hit by what police and safety advocates bluntly call “ice missiles.” Coverage of winter driving rules notes that laws in eleven states will make you regret skipping the scraper, especially if an “ice missile” you failed to clear causes a crash and fines that can shoot up to $1,000.
States did not move in lockstep. Many of the strictest rules grew out of specific tragedies in the Northeast corridor, where winter storms and dense traffic combine into a dangerous mix. Reporting on these laws points out that if you live in the Northeast, the statutes are particularly tough, often named after victims and designed to hold drivers accountable if flying debris causes damage, a pattern highlighted in coverage of Northeast rules.
The 11 states that explicitly fine snow and ice on cars
According to a detailed breakdown of state statutes, there are now eleven states with laws that specifically restrict driving with snow or ice on your vehicle. That list includes cold weather stalwarts such as Alaska, as well as more densely populated New England and Mid‑Atlantic states. A financial explainer on winter fines spells out that the eleven states are Alaska, Connecticut, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and several others, with penalties that can escalate sharply when debris actually hits another car.
Another consumer guide on winter driving laws reinforces that list and notes that the New Jersey news website NJ.com has tracked how these rules evolved, especially in states like Alaska and Michigan. A separate explainer framed the question bluntly under the heading “Where Is It Illegal To Drive With Snow And Ice On Your Car,” then walked through how each of the eleven states structures its fines and enforcement. Together, these reports make clear that in those jurisdictions, snow and ice are not just cosmetic issues, they are regulated hazards.
New Hampshire and the rise of “Jessica’s Law”
New Hampshire is often cited as the emotional center of this legal shift. The state’s law, widely known as Jessica’s Law, is named after Jessica, a victim whose death was linked to ice flying off a truck, and it has become a model for other states. Coverage of these rules notes that New Hampshire was one of the first to adopt a named statute after a high profile crash, and that many drivers there now understand that failing to clear their roofs can lead to steep fines and even criminal charges if someone is hurt, a pattern highlighted in reporting on But the broader safety push.
Later coverage of winter driving laws points out that many of these states have named their statutes after victims of this kind of negligence, explicitly citing Jessica’s Law in New Hampshire as a template. The same reporting notes that similar rules now exist in Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and that drivers who violate these “ice missile” laws can face penalties that depend heavily on a police officer’s discretion, a detail spelled out in a piece that observed that “Many of these states have named the laws mandating this after some victims of this negligence, like Jessica’s Law in New Hampshire.”
New Hampshire’s prominence in this debate is reflected in how often it appears in legal explainers and search tools. Guides to winter driving repeatedly reference New Hampshire statutes, and follow‑up searches on New Hampshire law show how often Jessica’s Law is used as shorthand for the broader idea that snow and ice must be cleared before driving.
New Jersey’s strict fines and the cost of a “snow-hawk”
New Jersey has some of the most detailed and widely publicized penalties for failing to clear a vehicle. A recent explainer on state law spells out that drivers who fail to remove snow and ice can be fined between $25 and $75 per offense, and that the statute explicitly warns that “Fine for not clearing car of snow Drivers who fail to do so can be fined between $25 and $75 per offense.” That same coverage notes that if snow or ice flies off and causes injury or property damage, the penalties can jump dramatically, turning what might have been a minor ticket into a serious financial hit.
New Jersey’s rules are also a reminder that these laws are not theoretical. Local reporting has tracked how police use their discretion to stop vehicles with obvious snow build‑up, and how judges weigh fines when debris actually causes harm. Legal explainers on winter driving repeatedly reference New Jersey as a leading example of a state that moved from general “unsafe driving” language to a specific snow and ice statute. Search tools that help drivers check local rules also highlight New Jersey as one of the places where a visible “snow-hawk” on your roof is most likely to result in a stop.
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and the Mid‑Atlantic approach
Other Mid‑Atlantic states have taken a similar path, often blending specific snow rules with broader unsafe driving statutes. Pennsylvania’s law allows officers to cite drivers when snow or ice falls from a vehicle and causes injury or damage, and legal guides emphasize that the state can impose fines that escalate when someone is hurt. Search results for Pennsylvania traffic law highlight these provisions, and follow‑up explainers on winter driving in Pennsylvania stress that drivers can be held responsible even if they did not realize ice had formed on their roofs overnight.
Rhode Island has also moved to address the problem, particularly as part of a broader regional push in New England. Legal summaries of state law note that Rhode Island drivers can face penalties if they fail to clear accumulated snow and ice that later becomes a hazard, and that enforcement often ramps up after major storms. Search tools that catalog state rules on winter driving repeatedly reference Rhode Island, and consumer explainers on “ice missile” laws list Rhode Island alongside New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Wisconsin as states where a snowy roof can quickly become a legal issue.
Connecticut, Tennessee, Wisconsin and the spread beyond New England
Connecticut has joined its neighbors in explicitly targeting snow and ice on vehicles, reflecting both its climate and its heavy commuter traffic. Legal explainers on winter driving list Connecticut among the eleven states with specific statutes, and consumer finance coverage underscores that Connecticut’s rules sit alongside those in Alaska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and others in a growing national pattern. These sources stress that in Connecticut, as in its neighbors, drivers are expected to clear not just their windshields but their roofs, hoods, and trunks before heading out.
What is striking is how far south and west these rules now reach. Tennessee and Wisconsin appear in the same lists of “ice missile” states, a reminder that winter hazards are not confined to New England. A widely shared explainer notes that many of these states have named their laws after victims, and explicitly lists Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Wisconsin as examples of places where drivers who violate these ice laws can face penalties that depend on a police officer’s discretion, a point made in the report that observed that “Drivers who violate these ice laws can face penalties on a police officer’s discretion” in Jessica Law coverage.
States without explicit bans still have ways to ticket you
Even in states that have not passed a named “ice missile” law, drivers are not necessarily off the hook. Many jurisdictions rely on general requirements that vehicles be in safe operating condition, or that drivers maintain clear views through their windows, to ticket people who head out with snow piled high. A winter driving explainer notes that in some places, leaving a “snow-hawk” on your car is treated as more than laziness, because broad traffic statutes already allow officers to cite drivers whose vehicles shed debris or whose views are obstructed, a point underscored in coverage that observed that “But as it turns out, leaving that ‘snow-hawk’ on your car is much more than a sign of laziness” in a piece on But the legal risks.
The Washington region is a good example of this more indirect approach. A fact check on winter driving rules in the capital region examined whether it is illegal to drive without wiping snow off your roof in D.C., Maryland, and Virginia. The answer was nuanced: while there is no single, named “snow on roof” statute, both Maryland and Virginia have broader laws that can be used to ticket drivers if snow or ice creates a hazard, and Maryland lawmakers have previously debated targeted bills such as MD Senate Bill 627. The same fact check framed the issue under the heading “QUESTION: Is it illegal to drive your car without wiping the snow off your roof in D.C., Maryland, and Virginia? ANSWE,” then walked through how existing statutes can still apply.
Why some warm states still care about snow and ice
It might be tempting to assume that only northern states worry about snow on cars, but the legal landscape is more complicated. Some states that rarely see heavy snow still appear in discussions of winter driving rules because they have broad debris or visibility laws that can apply if a rare storm hits. Guides to state traffic rules sometimes reference places like Georgia, not because they have named “ice missile” statutes, but because their general safety codes can be used to ticket drivers whose vehicles are not properly cleared.
Other states show up in winter law roundups because of their broader traffic safety cultures. For example, search tools that catalog state rules often include Massachusetts alongside its neighbors, even though its enforcement may lean more on existing unsafe driving statutes than on a single named snow law. Similarly, consumer explainers that list the eleven states with explicit snow and ice rules also reference nearby jurisdictions like Connecticut and New Hampshire, reinforcing the idea that even in regions where snow is less frequent, the legal expectation is that drivers will clear their vehicles when storms do arrive.
How to stay on the right side of the law this winter
For drivers, the practical takeaway is straightforward. If you live in or travel through any of the eleven states with explicit snow and ice laws, you should assume that leaving snow on your roof, hood, or trunk can result in a ticket, and that the fines can climb quickly if debris causes damage. Consumer explainers on winter driving stress that laws in eleven states will make you regret skipping the brush, especially when an “ice missile” you failed to clear leads to penalties that can reach Dec level fines. The safest approach is to treat clearing your car as part of your start‑up routine, just like fastening your seat belt.
Even outside those states, I would not count on a lack of explicit “snow on car” language to protect you. Broad unsafe driving, debris, and visibility statutes give officers wide latitude to stop vehicles that appear hazardous, and crash investigations can easily turn a lazy morning into a costly citation. Legal guides that walk through where it is illegal to drive with snow and ice on your car emphasize that the list of eleven states is a floor, not a ceiling, and that drivers in places from Alaska to Wisconsin and beyond should assume that if snow is on the ground, it should not be on their cars. A detailed explainer framed this under the heading “Jan Where Is It Illegal To Drive With Snow And Ice On Your Car,” then concluded that the safest legal strategy is simple: clear everything, every time.
More from MorningOverview