The next crewed trip around the Moon has hit another snag, and this time the culprit is a stubborn leak in the rocket’s fuel system. NASA has pushed back the Artemis II launch to at least March 2026 after engineers uncovered a hydrogen problem during a critical test, raising fresh questions about how ready the hardware really is for human flight. The delay underscores how a single technical flaw can ripple through an already tight schedule for returning astronauts to deep space.
Instead of a triumphant countdown in Feb, the agency is now racing to diagnose and fix the issue before the new window opens. The setback is a reminder that even after years of development, the Space Launch System and Orion capsule still have to prove they can perform together safely with a crew on board.
The leak that stopped the countdown
NASA has officially postponed the historic Artemis II mission after discovering a fuel leak during launch preparations, a problem serious enough to halt the final run-through before liftoff. The agency confirmed that the crewed flight will no longer launch in Feb and is now targeting a March window, citing the need to fully understand the source of the leak and verify the fix before committing astronauts to the journey, a shift it acknowledged in an update on NASA channels. Engineers traced the issue to the massive rocket’s fueling system, where supercold propellant must be loaded and drained with extreme precision.
Technical details emerging from the test campaign point to a hydrogen leak in the ground and vehicle interfaces that feed the Space Launch System during tanking. The problem surfaced during a full “wet dress rehearsal,” when teams at the launch site load the rocket with cryogenic propellants and walk through the entire countdown sequence, a process that was supposed to clear the way for a Feb liftoff but instead exposed a vulnerability that forced the Artemis II schedule to slip by about a month, as described in coverage of the Artemis II fueling test.
Why hydrogen keeps haunting Artemis
The new leak is not an isolated quirk but part of a pattern that has dogged NASA’s modern Moon rockets. Hydrogen is notoriously difficult to handle, because its tiny molecules can escape through minuscule gaps and seals, and the Artemis II Space Launch System and Orion stack in the Vehicl Assembly Building rely on a complex network of quick-disconnect fittings to move the superchilled fuel. Earlier uncrewed flights already revealed how sensitive these systems are, and the latest rehearsal showed that even small imperfections can trigger alarms and automatic cutoffs, a reality highlighted in reports on the Rocket fueling anomaly. Hydrogen’s advantages as a high-performance propellant come with this engineering tax, and Artemis is paying it in schedule slips.
During the latest wet rehearsal, controllers saw readings that indicated hydrogen was escaping near the interfaces that connect the ground systems to the 98-metre-tall rocket, prompting them to halt the countdown and scrub the test. That decision mirrored earlier caution during Artemis I, when hydrogen leaks repeatedly interrupted tanking and forced teams to rework seals and procedures, a history that continues to shape how NASA approaches the current crewed mission to the Moon, as noted in accounts of how issues during rehearsal cascaded into launch planning. The recurring theme is that hydrogen systems leave little margin for error, especially when human lives are at stake.
What the new timeline really looks like
On paper, the slip from Feb to March might sound minor, but it reshapes the entire near-term roadmap for sending crews back to lunar orbit. Internal planning documents now point to specific March opportunities for Artemis II, with backup dates stretching into April if the first attempts are not viable, a range that surfaced when a NASA document outlined target windows. Each launch window must align orbital mechanics, crew readiness, and ground infrastructure, so even a one-month delay can ripple into downstream missions that depend on Artemis II’s data and experience.
The broader Artemis program, led by NASA, is structured so that Artemis II is the first crewed test flight after the uncrewed Artemis I, and it is intended to loop astronauts around the Moon before later missions attempt a landing. That sequence means any shift in the earliest launch window for Artemis II, which has already moved as operations took longer than planned, pushes back the entire chain of milestones that follow, from building out lunar infrastructure to preparing for surface sorties, a reality captured in technical overviews of Artemis II. In practical terms, the new leak has not just delayed one rocket, it has nudged the schedule for humanity’s return to the Moon further into the future.
Inside the high-stakes rehearsal that exposed the flaw
The fuel leak emerged during what was supposed to be a confidence-building exercise, a full countdown simulation that loaded the rocket with propellant and took the clocks down to the final seconds. This “wet dress rehearsal” is designed to mimic launch day as closely as possible without actually lighting the engines, and in this case it revealed that the system could not safely hold hydrogen at the required pressures and temperatures. The scrubbed test at the pad in CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla underscored how much rides on these rehearsals, which are meant to catch exactly the kind of flaw that could otherwise appear with a crew strapped in, a point emphasized when NASA officials in Nasa briefings described the leak’s impact on the 98-metre-tall rocket.
Engineers now have to inspect the quick-disconnect hardware, analyze sensor data, and potentially swap out seals or lines before attempting another full tanking. The work is complicated by the need to roll the vehicle between the pad and the assembly building, coordinate with range schedules, and protect the rocket from Florida’s coastal environment, all while keeping astronauts and ground crews safe. That painstaking process was laid out in technical updates that traced how hydrogen leaks near the quick-disconnect interface of the Space Launch System, or SLS, forced NASA to adjust its plans for the upcoming crewed flight, as detailed in coverage By Sean Costello that focused on the Hydrogen behavior in the SLS hardware.
Balancing ambition, safety and public expectations
For NASA, the latest delay is a test of how to balance political and public pressure with the uncompromising safety standards required for human spaceflight. Artemis II will be the first mission to carry humans toward the Moon since the Apollo era, and it sits at the heart of a broader Artemis strategy that aims to establish a sustained presence in lunar orbit and on the surface. That context raises the stakes for every technical decision, and it is why agency leaders have repeatedly stressed that there is no rush to launch at the expense of thorough checks, a stance echoed when NASA’s associate administrator, speaking from CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla, said there was no “schedule pressure” driving the timing of the crewed flight, a message relayed in local reporting from CAPE. That insistence on caution may frustrate those eager to see a launch, but it reflects hard lessons from past programs.
At the same time, the agency is working to keep the public engaged and informed about what Artemis II will actually do once it flies. Detailed mission previews describe how the crew will test life support, navigation, and communication systems on a multi-day loop around the Moon, building on the uncrewed data from Artemis I and paving the way for later landings, a profile that has been laid out in explainers Written by Kate Howells with Science Review by Asa Stahl. Public interest remains high, and surveys and a poll of space enthusiasts suggest strong support for the Artemis program’s goals, especially the prospect of seeing astronauts orbit the Moon again for the first time since Apollo, a sentiment reflected in backgrounders on Artemis that connect NASA’s current plans to its Apollo heritage.
More from Morning Overview
