The Great Pyramid has always invited audacious explanations, from alien architects to supernatural levitation. Now a cluster of new engineering studies is pushing aside the fringe ideas and replacing them with something even more startling: a picture of ancient Egyptian builders using hidden pulleys and water-powered lifts to move stone with a precision that rivals modern construction. Instead of brute-force labor alone, the emerging view is of a highly choreographed system of internal shafts, hydraulic basins and counterweights operating inside the monument itself.
What makes this shift so striking is that it does not diminish the achievement of the Egyptians, it magnifies it. If the latest research is right, the Great Pyramid was not just a giant tomb, it was also a machine, a structure whose own geometry and internal spaces were harnessed to raise its blocks into place at unprecedented speed.
A hidden lifting engine inside the Great Pyramid
The boldest new claim is that the Great Pyramid contains an internal lifting system that once hauled its massive stones upward from the inside out. One recent Study argues that the monument’s narrow corridors and sealed cavities were not just symbolic passageways but functional channels for moving stone. In this reading, the Great Pyramid becomes a kind of vertical conveyor, with blocks entering at lower levels and being ratcheted upward through a sequence of internal stages until they emerged near their final courses.
That internal mechanism is now being tied to a broader reappraisal of how quickly the structure could have risen on the Giza plateau. New analysis of the layout around the Great Pyramid and Great Sphinx of surrounding complex suggests that the builders designed the entire site as an integrated work yard, with access routes and staging areas feeding into internal shafts. By treating the pyramid as a machine rather than a static pile of stone, researchers are trying to explain how such a vast project could be completed within the reign of a single king without resorting to impossible workforce numbers.
Pulleys, counterweights and the speed problem
At the heart of the new theory is a deceptively simple question: how did the Egyptians move so much stone so fast. A team of Jan Scientists has proposed that the answer lies in a sophisticated pulley system, concealed within the pyramid’s body, that multiplied human effort. Instead of dragging blocks up long external ramps, workers could have attached them to ropes and wooden frames, then used counterweights to lift them in short, controlled stages. This would dramatically cut the distance each block had to travel and reduce friction, solving the long standing “speed problem” that has dogged traditional ramp models.
Another group has framed the same idea in terms of a Hidden Pulley System embedded in the Great Pyramid of Giza itself. In that reconstruction, wooden beams, stone-lined shafts and concealed cavities form a vertical track where blocks could be hoisted, pivoted and slotted into place with minimal rehandling. I find this approach compelling because it treats the internal architecture as evidence of engineering intent rather than as a puzzle to be explained away with purely ritual interpretations. It also aligns with the broader pattern of Egyptian builders using simple machines, like levers and sledges, in highly optimized ways.
Water as a lifting force, from Djoser to Giza
The pulley hypothesis does not stand alone. Parallel research is arguing that water itself was a key lifting force in Egypt’s pyramid age, turning the desert into a kind of construction dockyard. Engineers behind a recent analysis of how the pyramids were built have suggested that the monuments may have relied on a hydraulic elevation mechanism, a system in which rising water levels in enclosed shafts helped float or buoy heavy blocks upward. In that scenario, the structure becomes a controlled water chamber, with carefully timed flooding and draining cycles doing much of the vertical work that ramps would otherwise handle, an idea that echoes the “hydraulic elevation mechanism” described in How Were the.
Support for this water based approach comes from earlier monuments. Research into the Pyramid of Djoser has suggested that ancient Egyptians may have used a hydraulic lift to raise stone blocks, implying that water powered construction was part of their toolkit long before Giza’s peak. Another study of the Step Pyramid argues that Egyptian engineers may have diverted canals and basins, using water not only to irrigate crops but also to float construction materials closer to the building site. When I connect these dots, the Great Pyramid’s internal shafts start to look less like mysterious voids and more like the logical culmination of a long tradition of hydraulic experimentation.
Some archaeologists have gone further, suggesting that “water lifted blocks into the sky,” a vivid phrase used to describe a proposed system of internal basins and channels that could have raised stones in stages through the monument’s core. In that reconstruction, the arid landscape of Egypt is not a barrier but a backdrop for a carefully managed water infrastructure, with temporary reservoirs and channels feeding the pyramid’s internal lifts. Advocates of this view argue that such a system would revolutionize our understanding of ancient engineering, recasting Egyptian builders as expert managers of fluid dynamics, a claim that underpins the idea of Revolutionizing the Narrative hydraulic approach.
New evidence, old mysteries and a looming revelation
What gives these theories weight is that they are not emerging in a vacuum. Remote sensing and thermal imaging have revealed previously unknown voids and anomalies inside the Great Pyramid, prompting some researchers to argue that Egypt’s Great Pyramid construction story is being rewritten as new evidence exposes how it was actually built. One recent analysis of Egypt’s Great Pyramid contrasts these findings with Traditional ramp based explanations, arguing that long external causeways would have been inefficient for lifting stones to the upper courses. Instead, the new data are being marshaled to support internal lifting models that better match the observed voids and stress patterns.
Egyptian officials are leaning into the sense of anticipation. Renowned Egyptologist Zahi Hawass has hinted that Egypt is preparing an archaeological surprise in 2026 that will “rewrite history,” specifically tied to new passages and chambers in the Great Pyramid that were previously inaccessible. In one account, Egypt is described as readying an announcement that could transform our understanding of how the monument was built, while another report notes that Egyptologist Zahi Hawass has been teasing a Great Pyramid of Giza revelation timed for that same year. If those new spaces turn out to be parts of an internal lifting network, they could provide the physical proof that pulley and hydraulic models have been waiting for.
From fringe speculation to testable engineering
For decades, the vacuum left by incomplete evidence around pyramid construction has been filled by speculation, from slave labor myths to extraterrestrial builders. The new wave of research is trying to replace that noise with testable engineering models. One team of Scientists has even suggested that satellite data and thermal anomalies may have provided the “clue from space” that unlocked how the Egyptian pyramids were built, reframing one of history’s greatest enigma as a solvable engineering puzzle. In that context, the Great Pyramid’s internal voids are not mysterious gifts to conspiracy theorists but measurable features that can be modeled, simulated and, eventually, explored by robots and endoscopes.
Other researchers are focusing on the human side of the equation. A Jan analysis of Egyptians using a pulley system to build the Great Pyramid so fast emphasizes that such methods would have allowed a relatively modest workforce to achieve extraordinary output by leveraging mechanical advantage. Another Jan report on Construction of the monument situates these ideas in the broader timeline of Egypt’s Old Kingdom, arguing that the project had to fit within a specific reign length, which in turn constrains acceptable engineering solutions. I see this as the most promising direction: treating the pyramid not as an unsolvable mystery but as a problem in logistics, physics and labor management that can be reverse engineered from the stone up.
More from Morning Overview