The Moon, long treated as a geologically dead world, is producing seismic activity from sources that scientists are only now beginning to identify. Reanalysis of decades-old Apollo seismic records, combined with modern orbital imagery, has revealed that the lunar interior and surface are far more active than previously understood. The findings carry direct consequences for future crewed missions, where even modest ground shaking could threaten habitats and equipment.
A Shrinking Moon and Its Active Faults
As the Moon slowly cools, its interior contracts, and that contraction generates stress across the crust. The result is a network of young lobate thrust faults, some only tens of millions of years old, that scar the surface for miles. A peer-reviewed study published in Nature Geoscience connected a subset of shallow moonquakes recorded by Apollo seismometers to these thrust faults, which were mapped using Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera imagery. The timing of seismic events near lunar apogee, when tidal stresses from Earth peak, suggests the faults are not relics but are still slipping today.
According to NASA scientists, global contraction combined with Earth’s tidal pull can load these thrust faults enough to trigger shallow moonquakes. Think of the process like the skin of a drying fruit wrinkling and cracking under pressure. Unlike deep moonquakes, which originate hundreds of kilometers below the surface, shallow events rupture close to the crust and can produce stronger local shaking. For any future lunar base, especially one near the south pole where several of these faults have been identified, the hazard is real and measurable rather than theoretical.
Thousands of Hidden Events in Apollo Data
The Apollo program deployed seismometers on the lunar surface between 1969 and 1977, but the instruments generated far more data than researchers could process with the computing power available at the time. A recent study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets applied modern detection algorithms to the Apollo short-period seismic records and identified more than 22,000 events that had not been cataloged previously, including dozens of newly recognized shallow moonquakes. The sheer volume of missed signals suggests that original Apollo-era catalogs captured only a fraction of the Moon’s seismic output, and that the lunar environment is far more dynamic than mid-20th-century analyses implied.
Beyond raw numbers, the new detections allowed researchers to update key seismicity parameters such as the b-value, a statistical measure describing how the frequency of quakes scales with magnitude. The study also documented spatial variation in lunar seismic activity, showing that moonquakes are not evenly distributed but cluster in specific regions. That regionality matters because it implies the Moon’s interior stress field is heterogeneous, driven by local geology and fault geometry rather than a single uniform cooling process. For mission planners choosing landing sites, these spatial patterns offer early guidance on which areas carry higher seismic risk and where additional monitoring would be most valuable.
Deep Moonquake Nests and Tidal Rhythms
Shallow quakes are not the only category that has grown with reanalysis. A foundational study published in Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors used waveform cross-correlation and clustering techniques to expand the catalog of deep moonquakes from 1,360 to 7,245 identified events. The reanalysis also revealed new source “nests,” discrete zones deep inside the Moon where quakes repeatedly originate. These nests sit roughly 700 to 1,100 kilometers below the surface, well within the lunar mantle, and their activity follows tidal cycles tied to Earth’s gravitational influence, producing sequences of events that recur with striking regularity.
The existence of so many deep sources complicates the simple picture of a quietly cooling body. Each nest behaves almost like a repeating seismic engine, firing at predictable intervals as tidal forces flex the deep interior. When combined with the shallow fault activity driven by contraction, the Moon emerges as a world with at least two distinct seismic regimes operating simultaneously. One critical gap in current understanding is whether diurnal thermal cycles at the surface interact with deeper tidal stresses to create hybrid triggering conditions, a hypothesis that existing Apollo data alone cannot confirm and that will require new instrumentation to test rigorously.
Thermal Moonquakes and the Apollo 17 Record
A separate and often overlooked category of lunar seismicity comes not from tectonic stress but from temperature swings. The lunar surface endures temperature changes of roughly 300 degrees Celsius between day and night, and that extreme cycling causes rocks and regolith to expand and contract rapidly. An open dataset hosted by Caltech archives contains Apollo 17 Lunar Seismic Profiling Experiment data along with a curated thermal moonquake catalog tied to a JGR: Planets publication. The catalog documents seismic signals driven by diurnal heating and cooling, confirming that thermal stress is a genuine and recurring source of ground motion on the Moon rather than a minor background effect.
Researchers including Thomas Watters and Nicholas Schmerr have examined Apollo 17 samples and observations to investigate how these thermal and tectonic signals overlap. A report summarized by NASA’s lunar science team describes how Apollo seismic records, combined with Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imagery, were used to associate moonquakes with specific surface faults near the south pole. Their work indicates that many signals once attributed to random meteoroid strikes are better explained by internal processes. That distinction matters because meteoroid impacts are inherently unpredictable, whereas tectonic and thermal moonquakes follow patterns tied to orbital mechanics and solar illumination, opening the door to practical forecasting for future surface operations.
What New Seismic Tools Could Reveal
The renewed focus on lunar seismicity has made clear that Apollo instruments, impressive for their time, were only a first step. The original network was sparse, clustered on the near side, and limited in frequency bandwidth and sensitivity. Modern seismometers, by contrast, could detect far smaller events and capture a wider range of waveforms, allowing scientists to distinguish more cleanly between shallow thrust-fault slip, deep tidal moonquakes, thermal cracking, and genuine impact signals. Deploying such instruments across multiple latitudes and longitudes would transform the current patchwork catalog into a global map of active structures, illuminating how stresses vary from the equatorial highlands to the polar regions.
Future missions could also tackle unanswered questions raised by recent studies. For example, the Nature Geoscience work on lunar thrust faults suggests that some scarps may still be creeping or slipping in response to ongoing contraction and tides, but the precise slip rates remain uncertain. High-density seismic arrays near these features could measure how often they rupture and how strong the resulting shaking is at different distances. At the same time, improved thermal sensors and shallow subsurface probes would clarify how daily temperature gradients propagate into the regolith and whether they modulate fault friction, potentially linking the thermal and tectonic regimes more tightly than currently demonstrated.
For human exploration, the implications are practical as well as scientific. Habitat designers must account not only for micrometeoroids and radiation but also for ground motion that can jostle structures, loosen joints, and disturb regolith around landing pads and power systems. By pairing seismic monitoring with geological mapping and Apollo-era insights, engineers can identify safer zones, orient buildings away from likely rupture planes, and schedule sensitive operations at times when tidal and thermal stresses are lowest. As agencies and commercial partners plan long-term bases, the message from decades of reanalyzed data is unambiguous: the Moon is not seismically silent, and understanding its subtle quakes will be essential to living there safely.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
