When scientists pulled genetic material from a pair of naturally preserved bodies in the central Sahara, they expected to find familiar echoes of today’s Africans and Eurasians. Instead, the 7,000-year-old women carried a genetic signature that does not match any living population, a lineage that seems to have vanished without a trace. The discovery has stunned researchers, not because the DNA is alien, but because it forces a radical rethink of how many branches of our own species once shared the continent.
Their genomes point to a human story that is far more fractured and locally rooted than the sweeping migration maps in textbooks suggest. In the bones of these women, and in the sediments of a long-vanished wetland, I see a reminder that deep human history is not a straight line of progress, but a tangle of experiments in survival, some of which ended in silence.
The Green Sahara that hid a forgotten people
To understand why these mummies are so disruptive, I first have to picture the Sahara as it was when they were alive. Around 7,000 years ago, the region that is now one of the harshest deserts on Earth was a mosaic of lakes, rivers, and grasslands, a “Green Sahara” that supported hunters, fishers, and herders who left behind rock art and burial sites in places like the Takarkori rock shelter in what is now Libya. Archaeologists had already uncovered skeletons there, but only when researchers began extracting ancient DNA did it become clear that some of these people were not just culturally distinct, they were genetically unlike anyone known today, a conclusion reinforced when 7,000-year-old skeletons from this Green Sahara were shown to represent a previously unknown human lineage in detailed genomic work on the ancient remains.
The environment that nurtured them was not a brief anomaly. Climate records and archaeological layers indicate that this humid phase lasted long enough for communities to settle, bury their dead in organized cemeteries, and adapt their tools and diets to lakes and savannas rather than dunes. That stability matters, because it gave isolated groups time to develop their own genetic profiles, especially in pockets like Takarkori where geography and ecology could limit contact with outsiders. When the climate later shifted and the Sahara dried, many of those communities would have been squeezed, displaced, or extinguished, taking their distinctive DNA with them and leaving only hints in the bones that survived.
The Takarkori mummies and their “impossible” DNA
The most striking evidence comes from Two 7,000-year-old women whose bodies were naturally mummified in the Takarkori rock shelter, their tissues dried and preserved by the desert conditions. When geneticists sequenced their genomes, they found that these individuals did not fit into any known cluster of modern Africans or Eurasians, and that their ancestry could not be explained as a simple mix of familiar lineages. Instead, the women carried what researchers describe as “strange DNA profiles,” a pattern that suggests they belonged to a population that has no direct modern descendants, as highlighted in reporting on how Two 7,000-year-old women challenge existing models of population history.
From a scientific standpoint, there is nothing supernatural about this “impossible” DNA. It is fully human, but it carries combinations of genetic variants that do not appear in any sampled living group, and only faint echoes in other ancient genomes. That is what makes it so jarring: for decades, genetic reconstructions of African prehistory have leaned heavily on present-day populations, assuming that most ancient diversity would still be visible in some form. The Takarkori women show that entire branches of Homo sapiens could flourish for thousands of years and then disappear so completely that their genetic signature survives only in a pair of mummies in a Libyan rock shelter.
A secret branch on the human family tree
When researchers compared the Takarkori genomes with a wide panel of ancient and modern DNA, they found that the women formed their own cluster, distinct from known African hunter-gatherers, early farmers, and later pastoralists. The best fit was that they represented a “ghost” population, a branch of our species that split off early and then remained largely on its own, contributing little or nothing to the gene pool of people alive today. One analysis described this as a hidden offshoot of the human family tree, a group that had been invisible until 7,000-year-old mummy DNA exposed a secret branch of humanity that had persisted in isolation for tens of thousands of years, a scenario laid out in detail in coverage of how Remarkably long-lived lineages can vanish.
This idea of ghost populations is not new in genetics, but it is usually invoked to explain subtle statistical signals, not entire genomes that sit off to the side of known variation. The Takarkori case is different because the evidence is so concrete: two complete individuals, with clear archaeological context, whose DNA forces modelers to add a new branch to their diagrams. That branch appears to have diverged from other African lineages deep in the past, then stayed genetically isolated for an astonishing span of time, which implies that the Green Sahara was not a simple crossroads where everyone mixed freely, but a patchwork of semi-separate worlds.
How scientists pulled whole genomes from desert mummies
Recovering such detailed genetic information from bodies that old is technically daunting, especially in a region where heat and humidity can shred DNA. In this case, scientists focused on the densest bones, such as the petrous part of the temporal bone in the skull, which is known to preserve genetic material better than most tissues. Using clean-room protocols and high-throughput sequencing, they were able to reconstruct whole genomes from the 7,000-year-old remains, a feat that allowed them to compare the Takarkori women directly with both ancient and modern populations across Africa and beyond, as described in reports on how Scientists recovered whole genomes from 7,000-year-old mummies in the Sahara Desert.
The quality of the data matters because it lets researchers move beyond broad ancestry labels and look at fine-scale patterns, such as runs of homozygosity that indicate inbreeding or the presence of specific alleles linked to diet and disease. In the Takarkori genomes, analysts found no evidence of close-kin mating, which suggests that the community was large and interconnected enough to avoid the genetic pitfalls of extreme isolation, even as it remained distinct from neighboring groups. That combination, demographic robustness without much outside gene flow, is part of what makes this lineage so unusual and so informative about how human populations can remain separate for long periods without collapsing.
What the burial site reveals about life in the Green Sahara
The DNA is only one layer of the story. The Takarkori rock shelter itself, with its stratified burials and associated artifacts, offers a window into how these women and their kin lived. Archaeologists have documented multiple phases of occupation, with changes in tools, pottery, and subsistence strategies that track the shifting climate around them. The two mummified women were buried with care, their bodies positioned deliberately, which hints at social norms and perhaps spiritual beliefs that treated the dead with respect and ritual. Their presence in a shared cemetery also suggests a community that returned to the same place over generations, reinforcing the idea of a stable, rooted population in the Green Sahara.
Environmental evidence from the site, including animal bones and plant remains, points to a mixed economy of fishing, hunting, and gathering, with some early signs of herding as conditions allowed. That flexibility would have been essential in a landscape that was gradually drying, as lakes shrank and grasslands retreated. Yet even as the ecology changed, the genetic data indicate that the Takarkori people did not simply merge into incoming groups. Instead, they seem to have maintained their distinct identity until the environment could no longer support them, at which point their lineage faded rather than being fully absorbed, a pattern that helps explain why their DNA looks so singular today.
A lineage that stayed apart while others moved
One of the most striking conclusions from the genomic analyses is that the Takarkori lineage remained genetically isolated from other humans for tens of thousands of years. Population models that fit the data suggest an early split from other African groups, followed by a long period with very limited gene flow, even as other populations were moving, mixing, and spreading across the continent and into Eurasia. This isolation is not absolute, but it is strong enough that the Takarkori genomes stand out as a separate branch, a finding that has been emphasized in accounts of how a Green Sahara population stayed apart from other humans for remarkably long periods, as seen in detailed reconstructions of the human lineage that lived in isolation in the Green Sahara 7,000 years ago.
This pattern complicates the familiar narrative in which ideas and people spread together in sweeping waves. In the Sahara, it appears that cultural innovations, such as new tool types or herding practices, could move between groups without much intermarriage, a process sometimes described as the spread of ideas rather than large migrations. The Takarkori women may have used technologies or customs that originated elsewhere, yet their DNA shows that their ancestors did not mix extensively with those innovators. That decoupling of culture and genes is a powerful reminder that human history cannot be read off genetic data alone, and that people can adopt new ways of life while still remaining, in a biological sense, their own separate branch.
Why their DNA lacks modern human signatures
Perhaps the most headline-grabbing claim is that these 7,000-Year-Old remains were discovered without modern human DNA, a shorthand way of saying that the Takarkori genomes lack the characteristic mix of ancestries seen in people alive today. When researchers scanned for markers associated with later population expansions, such as those linked to early farmers or pastoralists who spread across Africa, they found that the Takarkori women did not carry those signatures. Instead, their genetic makeup reflects an older structure, one that predates the reshuffling events that eventually produced the patterns we see in present-day populations, a point underscored in reports that describe how Year Old Mummies Discovered Without Modern Human DNA challenge assumptions about continuity.
It used to be thought that the Sahara acted mainly as a corridor, a place people passed through on their way between sub-Saharan Africa and the Mediterranean. The Takarkori evidence suggests a different picture, in which some groups stayed put for longer periods of time, buffered by local resources and perhaps by social boundaries that limited intermarriage. The reason the Takarkori stayed genetically distinct appears to be a combination of geography, ecology, and choice, with the Green Sahara providing enough isolation to slow or prevent interaction between human populations that were otherwise reshaping the continent’s genetic landscape. Their absence from modern genomes is not a mystery of alien ancestry, but a testament to how thoroughly later demographic events can overwrite earlier layers of diversity.
The researchers behind the discovery and what comes next
The work that brought this hidden lineage to light was the product of a multidisciplinary team that combined field archaeology, ancient DNA methods, and population genetics. Researchers excavated the Takarkori burials, documented the context of the Two mummified women, and then collaborated with geneticists who sequenced and analyzed their DNA. Among those involved were specialists like Louise Humphrey, a research leader who has emphasized that the Takarkori community showed demographic health, with no evidence of inbreeding, and that their genomes expand the known range of human variation in North Africa. The sequencing of these 7,000-year-old skeletons from the Green Sahara, including two naturally mummified women from Libya, was reported in detail by Sarah Kuta, Daily Corresp, who noted that Researchers recently sequenced the genomes and published the results in a leading journal.
For me, the most important implication of their work is not just that we have found a new branch of the human family tree, but that we now have a concrete case study of how climate shifts and regional isolation can prune that tree. As more sites across the Sahara and the broader Sahel yield ancient DNA, I expect we will see additional ghost lineages, some of which may have contributed small traces to modern populations, others that vanished as completely as the Takarkori branch seems to have done. Each new genome will refine our models, but it will also deepen the sense that human history is full of lost possibilities, entire peoples whose stories survive only in a few bones and the fragile molecules preserved within them.
Rethinking human prehistory in Africa
The Takarkori discovery lands in the middle of a broader shift in how scientists view Africa’s deep past. Instead of a single, simple expansion of Homo sapiens out of a small ancestral population, the emerging picture is of a continent-wide network of semi-isolated groups that sometimes mixed and sometimes did not, with climate pulses opening and closing corridors over tens of thousands of years. The Green Sahara mummies fit neatly into this mosaic model, showing that even in regions that seem like natural crossroads, local lineages could persist in relative isolation, accumulating their own genetic quirks and cultural traditions. That perspective is reinforced by analyses of 7,000-year-old skeletons from the Green Sahara that reveal a previously unknown human lineage and highlight how complex the population structure of ancient North Africa really was, as detailed in work on 7000-year-old skeletons from this region.
Using ancient DNA to track changes over time, rather than inferring everything from present-day genomes, is central to this rethinking. The Takarkori women show that some lineages leave no living descendants, which means that any reconstruction based solely on modern DNA will miss key branches and underestimate past diversity. As more 7,000-year-old and older genomes are sequenced across Africa, I expect the map of human prehistory to become even more intricate, with multiple overlapping expansions, contractions, and local experiments in survival. The “impossible” DNA of the Takarkori mummies is not an outlier so much as a preview of how much of our own species’ story still lies buried, waiting for the right combination of archaeology and genetics to bring it back into view.
More from MorningOverview