Astronomers studying a brief optical flare detected in 2022 say it may have been caused by a black hole ripping apart a star, and the event’s unusual properties point toward a type of black hole that has long eluded direct observation. The flare, designated AT2022zod, erupted in an elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.11 and lasted roughly 30 days, far too short and too bright to match the behavior expected from the galaxy’s central supermassive black hole. If the interpretation holds, the event could represent one of the clearest signals yet of an intermediate-mass black hole, the so-called “missing link” between small stellar-mass black holes and the supermassive giants anchoring galaxy centers.
A 30-Day Flare That Defies Its Host Galaxy
AT2022zod was first picked up by the Zwicky Transient Facility, the wide-field survey camera at Palomar Observatory that scans the sky nightly for sudden changes in brightness. The flare appeared in an elliptical galaxy and evolved over roughly 30 days, rising and fading on a timeline that immediately set it apart from most known transient events. Researchers who analyzed the flare classified it as a tidal disruption event, the violent process in which a black hole’s gravity tears a passing star into streams of superheated gas. NASA describes tidal disruption events as the signature of “star-shredding” black holes, identified through multi-instrument follow-up that captures X-ray, optical, and sometimes neutrino signatures.
The central puzzle is one of scale. The host galaxy is thought to harbor a central supermassive black hole on the order of ~100 million solar masses, based on estimates discussed in the preprint analysis. A black hole that large should produce a tidal disruption event with a longer timescale and different luminosity profile than what AT2022zod displayed. The roughly 30-day duration and the flare’s brightness are inconsistent with a disruption by a 100-million-solar-mass object, according to the preprint analysis. The research team systematically ruled out other explanations, including active galactic nucleus variability, a supernova, a kilonova from a compact-object merger, and a periodic tidal disruption event. Each alternative failed to account for the combination of the flare’s short duration, spectral properties, and location within the galaxy.
Why an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Fits
Strip away the alternatives and what remains is a scenario that astronomers have been searching for across decades: a tidal disruption event powered not by the galaxy’s central supermassive black hole but by a smaller, separate black hole lurking elsewhere in the system. Intermediate-mass black holes, those weighing between roughly a thousand and a hundred thousand solar masses, occupy a gap in the observed mass spectrum. Stellar-mass black holes form from collapsing stars and weigh up to a few dozen solar masses. Supermassive black holes sit at galaxy centers and range from millions to billions of solar masses. The space between those two populations has been notoriously difficult to fill with confirmed detections, which is why any credible candidate draws intense scrutiny.
AT2022zod’s short timescale is the key piece of evidence. A lighter black hole produces a faster, more energetic disruption because its tidal radius, the distance at which stellar material gets stripped away, sits closer to the event horizon. That geometry compresses the feeding process and shortens the flare. The preprint frames the event as evidence for a massive black hole in the intermediate range, one whose mass would naturally reproduce both the 30-day timescale and the observed luminosity. No direct spectroscopic measurement of the disrupting black hole’s mass exists yet, so the case rests on indirect reasoning from the flare’s behavior. That gap in confirmation is a limitation the authors acknowledge, and it leaves room for future observations to either strengthen or challenge the interpretation.
Wandering Black Holes and Off-Nuclear Disruptions
AT2022zod is not the only recent event hinting at black holes operating outside their expected positions. A separate preprint from February 2026 documents TDE 2025abcr, an optical tidal disruption event discovered in the outskirts of a massive galaxy rather than at its center. That event’s off-nuclear location led researchers to propose two possible explanations: a dynamically ejected “wandering” black hole that was flung from the galaxy’s core during a past merger, or a stripped dwarf galaxy whose central black hole survived after the smaller galaxy was absorbed by its larger neighbor. Both scenarios describe black holes that are gravitationally unmoored from the galactic center, roaming through the outer regions and occasionally betraying their presence by shredding a star that wanders too close.
The parallel between AT2022zod and TDE 2025abcr is instructive even though the two are distinct objects in different galaxies. Both events challenge the default assumption that tidal disruptions happen at galaxy centers, driven by the resident supermassive black hole. If intermediate-mass or ejected black holes are responsible for a meaningful fraction of these flares, then the current census of tidal disruption events may be systematically skewed. Astronomers have historically looked for these events near galactic nuclei, and any black hole operating off-center would be harder to associate with a host and easier to misclassify or miss entirely.
Dust, Selection Bias, and Hidden Populations
The problem of missing black holes extends beyond location. A peer-reviewed study published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters used the James Webb Space Telescope to confirm tidal disruption events in dusty galaxies by detecting infrared fingerprints of accretion. Dust absorbs optical and ultraviolet light, which means that traditional surveys tuned to those wavelengths would overlook many flares occurring in obscured environments. By watching in the infrared, JWST revealed black holes actively consuming stellar debris behind thick curtains of dust, suggesting that the true rate of tidal disruption events is significantly higher than optical surveys alone imply.
This selection bias has direct implications for intermediate-mass black hole searches. If many tidal disruptions are hidden in dusty regions or in the outskirts of galaxies where survey coverage is patchy, then the apparent scarcity of intermediate-mass candidates may be partly an observational artifact. Space-based observatories that can probe a wide range of wavelengths, along with time-domain surveys that revisit the same patch of sky frequently, are beginning to chip away at that blind spot. Their combined data help astronomers build a more complete inventory of black hole activity across environments, from dust-choked galactic centers to sparsely populated halos.
From Cosmic Rarities to a Broader Black Hole Census
Events like AT2022zod are increasingly being placed into a broader storytelling framework that connects individual flares to the evolution of galaxies and their central engines. NASA’s public outreach platforms, including the curated video series that highlight current missions, frequently feature tidal disruption events as laboratories for extreme physics. By translating technical results into accessible narratives, these programs help non-specialists understand why a single 30-day flash in a distant galaxy can reshape theories about how black holes grow from modest seeds into the behemoths seen in the early universe.
The same outreach ecosystem is supported by hubs such as NASA Plus, which aggregates mission updates, explainer videos, and live coverage of major discoveries. When astronomers announce a candidate intermediate-mass black hole or an off-nuclear tidal disruption, these platforms can amplify the findings beyond the specialist community and help explain why follow-up observations matter.
Tidal disruption events also intersect with broader astrophysical themes that NASA science divisions explore across the cosmos. The agency’s Earth-focused programs, collected under its Earth science portfolio, study our planet and its changing systems. While black hole tidal disruptions are a very different domain, they are often discussed alongside other NASA science topics as examples of how extreme environments help test fundamental physics.
Similarly, research organized within NASA’s solar system program examines how gravitational encounters and dynamical ejections sculpt planetary orbits, asteroid belts, and comet reservoirs. The idea of a “wandering” black hole, potentially responsible for events like TDE 2025abcr, is an extrapolation of the same gravitational principles that move smaller bodies around our own Sun. Studying off-nuclear black holes therefore feeds back into a unified picture of how gravity rearranges matter on every scale, from rogue planets and interstellar visitors to black holes drifting through galactic halos.
As astronomers continue to monitor the sky for fast, luminous transients, AT2022zod stands as a test case for how carefully vetted anomalies can reshape the black hole landscape. Its 30-day flash, inconsistent with the expected behavior of a 100-million-solar-mass central object, has opened a window onto the elusive intermediate-mass regime and strengthened the case for black holes that roam beyond galactic cores. Whether future observations confirm this interpretation or force a revision, the event has already sharpened the questions researchers ask about where black holes live, how they grow, and how often they reveal themselves by tearing stars apart. In that sense, AT2022zod is less an isolated curiosity than a signpost pointing toward a richer, more nuanced census of black holes across the universe.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
