Scientists have spent decades trying to crack the carbon–fluorine armor that makes “forever chemicals” so persistent in the environment. Now a team working with lithium battery chemistry has found a way to flip the script, turning the same conditions that kill a battery into a tool that can dismantle these stubborn pollutants in water. Instead of just diluting or filtering toxic compounds, the approach aims to break them down into harmless building blocks.
At the heart of the work is a simple but radical idea: use the extreme, electron-rich environment inside a failing lithium cell to pry apart some of the strongest bonds in organic chemistry. By reimagining what a “dead” battery can do, the researchers are opening a path toward cleaning up per‑ and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, that have accumulated in drinking water, soil, and even human bloodstreams.
Why PFAS are so hard to kill
PFAS were engineered to be nearly indestructible, which is exactly what makes them so useful in raincoats, nonstick pans, firefighting foams, and countless industrial coatings. Their signature carbon–fluorine bonds are among the strongest in organic chemistry, so once these molecules escape into the environment they resist heat, sunlight, and most conventional treatment methods. As a result, PFAS have spread globally, with traces now detected in remote rainwater and in the blood of people who have never lived near a chemical plant, a pattern highlighted in reporting on how PFAS are everywhere.
Traditional cleanup strategies tend to move the problem around instead of solving it. Activated carbon filters, for example, can capture PFAS from drinking water, but the contaminated filters then have to be incinerated or landfilled, which risks releasing the chemicals again. High temperature destruction is energy intensive and still struggles with complete breakdown. That is why chemists have focused on “mineralization,” the process of converting PFAS into inorganic fluoride and simple carbon species, a challenge that recent PFAS research describes as one of the toughest problems in environmental chemistry.
Flipping lithium battery chemistry against PFAS
The breakthrough from University of Chicago researchers starts from an unexpected place: the failure modes of lithium batteries. In a typical cell, pushing the voltage too low or too high can trigger side reactions that degrade the electrolyte and electrodes, eventually killing the device. Instead of treating those conditions as something to avoid, the team asked what would happen if they deliberately created a highly reducing environment and fed it PFAS‑contaminated water. Their work on failed batteries shows that the same electron flow that ruins a battery can be harnessed to attack the carbon–fluorine backbone of these molecules.
In the lab, the researchers built an electrochemical cell that resembles a stripped‑down lithium battery, then dissolved PFAS into the electrolyte solution. By driving electrons from a lithium source into the PFAS‑laden mixture, they created conditions where the pollutants were more willing to accept electrons and fall apart. Coverage of this work explains that the team essentially turned “battery‑killing” conditions into a controlled tool for PFAS degradation, a concept detailed in reporting on how a battery tech platform can dismantle forever chemicals.
From 94% destruction to near‑complete breakdown
What makes the approach stand out is not just that it damages PFAS, but how thoroughly it does so. In tests with representative compounds, the lithium‑based system achieved a 94% destruction rate, meaning almost all of the original molecules were broken down. Reports on the same experiments note that University of Chicago researchers saw extensive defluorination and about 95 percent degradation, indicating that the process is not just clipping off side chains but going after the core of the molecule, as described in coverage of PFAS degradation.
The team emphasizes that they are “mainly mineralizing and pushing complete breakdown of PFAS instead of just chopping it into shorter fragments,” a distinction that matters because partial degradation can sometimes create byproducts that are just as persistent or toxic. Their electrochemical setup converts the carbon–fluorine bonds into inorganic fluoride and simpler carbon species, a pathway consistent with broader work on mineralization of PFAS. In some configurations, the researchers report degradation levels up to 99 percent, suggesting that with further optimization the system could approach complete removal of target compounds, a result highlighted in a University summary of the work.
The electrochemical trick: making PFAS easier to reduce
At the molecular level, the method exploits a subtle shift in how PFAS behave when they are surrounded by lithium ions and electrons. The researchers tested their idea by dissolving PFAS in the electrolyte solution of a lithium‑containing electrochemical cell, then driving current through the system. In that environment, the pollutants become more susceptible to reduction, meaning they are more willing to accept electrons and break apart. As one analysis of the experiments explains, the presence of lithium changes the energy landscape so that “giving it electrons is easier,” a key insight described in coverage of PFAS lithium chemistry.
In practical terms, the cell acts like a specialized reactor that funnels electrons directly into the PFAS molecules, rather than relying on heat or added chemicals to do the job. That direct electrochemical reduction is what allows the system to reach such high levels of defluorination. A detailed Lithium overview notes that Researchers at the University of Chicago Pritzke School of Molecular Engineering see this as a way to turn a known weakness of batteries into a strength for environmental cleanup, using the same fundamental chemistry that once limited device lifetimes to instead break down PFAS.
From lab cell to real‑world cleanup
Translating a benchtop experiment into a water treatment technology is never straightforward, but the battery‑inspired design offers some practical advantages. Electrochemical systems can be modular, so in principle utilities could deploy racks of these cells to treat contaminated groundwater or industrial effluent, much like they already use banks of filters. Reporting on the project notes that the University of Chicago team is exploring how to adapt the setup to handle flowing water streams and mixed PFAS cocktails, building on their initial battery failure experiments that targeted specific compounds that are notoriously difficult to remove from water.
The work also intersects with efforts to redesign batteries themselves so they do not rely on PFAS‑based components. Some next‑generation cells already aim to eliminate fluorinated binders and electrolytes, a trend described in coverage of next‑gen batteries that avoid forever chemicals altogether. If those cleaner devices eventually become standard, the same facilities that recycle or retire them could, in theory, be repurposed to host PFAS‑destroying reactors, closing a loop between energy storage and environmental remediation.
More from Morning Overview