For more than a century, scientists treated forests as collections of individual trees responding in parallel to the same weather and soil. New work on bioelectrical activity inside old growth suggests something far stranger is happening, with shared signals rippling through roots and fungi that can change how entire stands react to stress. The discovery of a coordinated “forest signal” does not just tweak existing models of ecology, it forces a rethink of how resilience, climate risk and even conservation technology should be understood.
I see this shift as part of a broader pattern in plant science, where hidden communication networks keep surfacing just as climate pressure on forests intensifies. From electrical pulses in ancient trunks to genetic switches that flip on cold resistance, the emerging picture is of ecosystems that sense, decide and sometimes anticipate danger in ways that older theories simply did not allow for.
Old trees, new signals: how elders warn the forest
The most provocative finding in this new wave of research is that old trees appear to act as information hubs, sending bioelectrical warnings to younger neighbors when conditions turn hostile. Instead of passively aging in place, these elders behave more like sentinels, their vast root systems and accumulated experience turning into a kind of early‑warning infrastructure for the forest. In work highlighted by Apr and reported by By Bronwyn Thompson, researchers tracked how electrical activity in veteran trunks surged in response to stress, then propagated outward in patterns that matched changes in nearby saplings’ physiology, suggesting that the elders were sharing critical intel with forest youth rather than simply reacting in isolation.
What overturns earlier assumptions is not just the existence of electrical activity, which botanists have known about for decades, but the structured way it seems to encode and transmit information. The team behind this work, which included Simone Cargnoni, found that the timing and amplitude of these pulses shifted depending on the type of threat, hinting at a vocabulary of signals rather than a single generic alarm. The evidence that old trees share critical intel with younger ones challenges the long‑held view that competition for light and nutrients is the dominant story in mature stands, and it raises a more unsettling question: what happens to this protective network when the oldest trees are logged or burned out of existence?
The underground grid: fungi, roots and the “wood wide web”
If old trees are the sentinels, the forest floor is the wiring. For years, ecologists have debated whether the so‑called “wood wide web” is a poetic metaphor or a literal communication grid, but the balance of evidence is shifting toward a more literal reading. Mycorrhizal fungi lace through soil and roots, forming dense networks that shuttle nutrients and, increasingly, look like channels for information. On the first area of underground communication among fungi themselves, researchers have documented electrical patterns that resemble simple codes, with one team arguing that these pulses could carry structured messages across the fungal grid, a claim detailed in work on underground communication and even compared to primitive language.
Popular accounts sometimes race ahead of the data, but the core idea that roots and fungi form a shared signaling infrastructure is now grounded in multiple lines of evidence. Forester and author Peter Wohlleben helped push this concept into public view by describing how beech trees, willows and others appear to “message their distress” in electrical signals via fungal threads, a description that captured imaginations precisely because it fit emerging lab results. In one widely cited explanation, he argued that the key to it, he, Peter Wohlleben, says, is the so‑called woodwide web, where trees alert others nearby when they are under attack, a claim that aligns with experimental work on trees that talk to each other. The new forest signal research effectively plugs into this debate, suggesting that what Wohlleben described anecdotally is now being resolved into measurable, repeatable patterns.
From myth to measurement: decoding forest “conversation”
For a long time, talk of trees warning each other sounded more like folklore than science, in part because the tools to measure subtle bioelectrical changes across a whole stand simply did not exist. That is changing fast. Sensitive electrodes, high‑frequency data loggers and machine learning are turning what used to be invisible noise into analyzable signals. I see the current moment as a pivot from metaphor to measurement, where claims about forest communication are being tested against hard data rather than intuition. The work highlighted by Apr and By Bronwyn Thompson is emblematic of this shift, with researchers mapping how specific electrical signatures in old trees correlate with downstream changes in sap flow, stomatal opening and growth rates in younger neighbors.
At the same time, the scientific community is pushing back against over‑romanticized narratives by insisting on clear mechanisms. Studies of fungal networks, for example, now distinguish between simple resource sharing and genuine signaling, asking whether changes in one part of the network reliably predict adaptive responses elsewhere. The debate around the “wood wide web” has matured into a more nuanced question about when and how information moves through these systems, a question that work on fungal communication is helping to clarify. In that context, the newly observed forest signal is less a magical revelation and more a missing piece in a complex, testable network model.
Climate stress is already pushing forest signals to the limit
The timing of these discoveries is not accidental. Forests are being pushed into unfamiliar territory by rising temperatures, and the new signaling data is arriving just as canopies begin to fail in ways that older models did not predict. In one influential study, They found that leaves in forests’ upper canopies were already above a threshold temperature for affecting photosynthesis, a result that suggests parts of the canopy are flirting with thermal limits even under current conditions. The lead researcher told the Guardian that this overheating could trigger feedback loops of leaf damage, reduced carbon uptake and increased vulnerability to fire, a warning that anchors the urgency behind the scientists who sounded the alarm.
Parallel work on large‑scale resilience paints an equally stark picture. A global analysis of satellite and ground data concluded that tropical, arid and temperate forests are experiencing a significant decline in resilience, probably related to increased water stress and climate variability. The authors warned that this weakening could push some regions toward tipping points where recovery from drought or disturbance slows dramatically, undermining nature‑based mitigation and adaptation plans that assume forests will keep absorbing carbon at current rates. The finding that forest resilience is declining reframes the new forest signal not as a comforting sign of self‑healing, but as a stressed system’s last line of defense that may already be under strain.
Cold, heat and the plant “genetic switchboard”
Electrical signals are only part of the story. Inside individual plants, genetic circuits act as another layer of sensing and response, flipping on protective programs when the environment turns hostile. A research team from South Korea has identified a “genetic switch” that helps plants survive the cold, showing how specific regulatory elements activate master resistance genes when temperatures drop. The work, led by a group from Sout Korea, revealed that this switch coordinates a cascade of downstream responses, from antifreeze proteins to changes in membrane composition, effectively reprogramming the plant for survival in a matter of hours.
What interests me is how this molecular switchboard might intersect with the forest‑scale signals emerging from old trees and fungal networks. If a bioelectrical warning from an elder can prime younger trees before a cold snap or heat wave fully arrives, then the genetic switch has a head start, turning on defenses while there is still time to avoid damage. The discovery that South Korean researchers found a genetic switch that activates master resistance genes underscores how multi‑layered plant defense really is, and it hints at future work where electrical, hormonal and genetic data are integrated into a single model of how forests anticipate and withstand stress.
Predicting disturbance: from silent woods to early‑warning systems
As the science of forest signaling matures, it is beginning to intersect with another urgent frontier: forecasting disturbance before it becomes catastrophe. A major European effort known as RESONATE has shown that forest disturbances can be predicted, using a mix of climate data, stand structure and historical patterns to anticipate where storms, droughts or pests are most likely to cause damage. The project’s findings, summarized by Gesche Schifferdecker July in a report on how forests face a rising threat of extreme disturbances, argue that risk is not evenly distributed, and that managers can use predictive tools to prioritize interventions in the most vulnerable stands.
What I find striking is how well the new forest signal research could plug into this predictive framework. If old trees and fungal networks are already acting as in situ sensors, then their electrical and chemical chatter could become an input to early‑warning systems, much like seismic networks feed into earthquake alerts. The RESONATE work suggests that forest disturbances can be predicted, and the next logical step is to fuse remote sensing with on‑the‑ground bioelectrical monitoring, turning the forest’s own nervous system into a live feed for risk models.
Smelling stress: electronic noses and chemical conversations
Electrical pulses and genetic switches are only two channels in a crowded communication spectrum. Trees and other plants also talk in chemicals, releasing volatile organic compounds when attacked by insects, starved of water or exposed to heat. These airborne cues can attract predators of herbivores, repel pests or prime neighboring plants to brace for impact. Current rapid technological development brought into question studies related to chemical ecology, because new sensors can now detect and classify these volatiles in real time. One line of work has focused on building an “electronic nose” for forests, comparing individual sensors to see which best detect stress signatures in stands threatened by bark beetles and other pests.
In these experiments, researchers found that specific sensor arrays could distinguish between healthy and stressed trees by reading the mix of attractants and anti‑attractants that mediate plant‑beetle‑based communication. The goal is to move from labor‑intensive field surveys to automated monitoring, where a network of devices quietly sniffs the air for early signs of trouble. The comparison of individual sensors in an electronic nose for stress detection in forest stands showed how chemical ecology and plant‑beetle communication can be translated into practical tools. When paired with bioelectrical measurements from old trees and fungal networks, these chemical readings could give managers a multi‑modal picture of forest health that is far richer than satellite imagery alone.
Rethinking conservation: protecting networks, not just trees
All of this forces a shift in how I think about conservation priorities. If old trees are not just big carbon stores but also key nodes in a forest’s communication network, then losing them has cascading effects that go beyond the immediate loss of biomass. Removing a veteran trunk might be more like cutting a fiber‑optic cable than felling an isolated pole. The evidence that elders share critical intel with forest youth, that fungal grids relay electrical patterns, and that canopies are already flirting with thermal thresholds suggests that resilience depends on the integrity of these networks as much as on the number of stems per hectare.
Policy tools have not caught up with this reality. Many reforestation programs still focus on planting large numbers of fast‑growing species, often in monocultures, to maximize short‑term carbon uptake. That approach risks creating forests that are numerically dense but communicatively impoverished, with shallow root systems, simplified fungal communities and few elders to anchor long‑range signaling. The emerging science on bioelectrical warnings from old trees, combined with evidence of declining resilience and predictable disturbance, argues for a different strategy: protect existing old growth as irreplaceable infrastructure, design restoration projects that foster diverse mycorrhizal networks, and deploy technologies like electronic noses and bioelectrical sensors to monitor not just how much forest we have, but how well its internal communication is functioning.
More from MorningOverview