Russia is preparing for life after the International Space Station by floating one of the most controversial ideas in modern spaceflight: detaching its aging ISS modules and turning them into the core of a new national outpost. The plan promises savings, continuity and a symbolic show of resilience, but it also asks a hard engineering question about whether hardware that has been in orbit for decades can safely anchor the country’s next chapter in low Earth orbit. I want to unpack how this strategy emerged, what it would actually involve and whether the physics, finances and politics line up enough for it to work.
From OPSEK to ROSS: how Russia’s post‑ISS dream kept changing
Russia’s desire for an independent station is not new, it has simply kept mutating as budgets shrank and geopolitics hardened. Earlier concepts like OPSEK, the Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex, imagined a fresh complex assembled in orbit, but over time that vision was rebranded into the Russian Orbital Service Station, or ROSS, also known in Russian as Rossiyskaya orbital’naya stantsiya, with the idea that some existing ISS elements could be reused as a shortcut to a sovereign platform in low Earth orbit. Reporting on the evolution of OPSEK into the Russian Orbital Service Station makes clear that recycling modules was not an afterthought but baked into the later iterations of the plan.
As the concept matured, Russian officials began to describe ROSS as a multi-module complex that would be assembled in stages and eventually replace the country’s presence on the ISS, which is expected to be deorbited by 2030. Public technical descriptions of The Russian Orbital Service Station emphasize that it is meant to maintain a continuous human presence in orbit even after the International Space Station is gone, with an initial configuration focused on Earth observation and servicing missions and later expansion into a more capable research hub. That long arc helps explain why Moscow is now willing to consider unorthodox steps, including reusing hardware that has already spent decades in space.
What ROSS is supposed to be, on paper
On paper, ROSS is pitched as a modern, flexible outpost that can support both national priorities and international partnerships, even if those partnerships look very different from the ISS era. Russian officials have described a phased buildout, with an initial core module providing basic life support, guidance and power, followed by additional elements for science, docking and possibly commercial activity. Internal planning documents for the Russian National Orbital Service Station frame it as a strategic infrastructure project that should keep Russian crews in orbit while also supporting satellite servicing and inspection missions.
Earlier this year, Russia approved initial designs for what it now calls the Russian Orbital Station, or ROS, and signaled that the first elements would be launched in the early 2030s, with a total cost that officials say will be significantly lower than the original ISS program. Those design approvals for the Russian Orbital Station underline that Moscow still intends to field a new complex rather than simply drifting along with the ISS until it burns up. The question is how much of that new complex will truly be new, and how much will be stitched together from the remnants of the current Russian Orbital Segment.
The bold “recycle the ISS” twist
The most eye-catching twist in Russia’s station strategy is the idea of physically detaching parts of its current ISS segment and using them as the seed for ROSS. Instead of letting those modules die with the rest of the ISS, Roscosmos has floated a plan to undock them, boost them into a slightly different orbit and then attach new components around them, effectively turning a worn-out neighborhood into the historic district of a new orbital city. The notion that Russia’s Next Space Station Could Reuse Its ISS Parts, Leaks and All has been described as a kind of orbital upcycling, but it is also a tacit admission that building an entirely fresh complex from scratch would be far more expensive and time consuming than the country’s current finances allow.
Critics have seized on the phrase “leaks and all” because the Russian Orbital Segment has been plagued by air leaks, aging seals and other issues that come with hardware that has been in orbit for decades. Coverage of how Russia’s Next Space Station Could Reuse Its ISS Parts, Leaks and All makes clear that the plan is not to refurbish these modules on the ground but to keep them in space, which raises obvious questions about how thoroughly they can be inspected, repaired and reinforced. Even supporters of the idea concede that it is a bold move that trades technical margin for political symbolism and short-term savings.
Why reuse is tempting: money, sanctions and pride
To understand why Moscow is even considering such a risky maneuver, I have to look at the economic and political context. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has triggered sweeping sanctions that have cut off access to Western components, financing and some commercial launch markets, which in turn has squeezed Roscosmos budgets and forced a rethink of earlier, more ambitious station plans. Reporting on how All of the initial ROS plans have been scrapped notes that the original vision of a gleaming new complex has been scaled back, with Russia now looking at more modest configurations and even potential cooperation with partners like a planned Indian space station to keep costs under control.
At the same time, there is a strong desire inside Russia’s political and space establishment to show that the country remains a major space power despite sanctions and the loss of Western partners. Commentators have described Russia’s next space station as a quintessentially Russian response to adversity, one that leans on improvisation and ruggedness rather than lavish new hardware. That mix of financial pressure and national pride helps explain why Roscosmos is willing to entertain a plan that many Western engineers view as a high-wire act with little margin for error.
The hardware reality: leaks, fatigue and a 25‑year‑old Zvezda
The romantic idea of recycling space hardware runs into a harsh reality when you look closely at the condition of the Russian modules on the ISS. Over the past several years, cosmonauts have repeatedly hunted down and patched air leaks in the Russian Orbital Segment, a sign that micrometeoroid impacts, thermal cycling and simple material fatigue are taking their toll. Analysts like Orlov have warned that these issues have not changed and that any new station built around old modules would inherit their vulnerabilities, because even the best maintenance cannot fully reverse decades of wear in orbit.
The flagship of the Russian segment, the service module Zvezda, is already around a quarter of a century old, and it has been at the center of many of these concerns. Technical assessments have pointed out that Zvezda (25 years old) is showing its age, with structural and systems degradation that would normally argue for retirement rather than promotion to the core of a new station. When I weigh those facts against the plan to detach and reuse such modules, it becomes clear that any recycled ROSS would start life with a built-in maintenance deficit, forcing engineers to devote significant resources to simply keeping the old hardware safe and airtight.
Inside the “Bold Plan” and the backlash it triggered
Roscosmos has tried to frame its approach as a pragmatic way to stretch the value of expensive space hardware, but the reaction from many experts has been skeptical at best. Commentaries on Russia’s Bold Plan to Recycle ISS Modules for New Space Station, Will It Work note that the decision to rely on aging modules is raising eyebrows worldwide, with engineers questioning whether the savings justify the risk of basing a new national outpost on components that are already near the end of their design life. The same analysis points out that Roscosmos is taking an approach that diverges sharply from partners like NASA, which are focusing on fresh commercial stations rather than trying to salvage large chunks of the ISS.
Some of the sharpest criticism has come from within Russia itself, where space veterans and commentators have warned that the plan could leave the country saddled with a fragile and unreliable station. One strand of that debate is captured in the question of whether Could Russia’s new space station be doomed from the start, a phrase that reflects fears that the recycling strategy is less a clever hack and more a symptom of a deeper crisis in the country’s space station strategy. When I read those critiques alongside Roscosmos’s own upbeat messaging, I see a widening gap between political ambition and the technical realities of keeping old hardware alive in orbit.
A shifting vision and the politics of “making do”
Behind the technical arguments lies a broader story about how Russia’s space ambitions have been forced to adapt to changing circumstances. For years, Roscosmos talked about an independent station as a symbol of a confident future, but as budgets tightened and international cooperation frayed, that vision has been repeatedly scaled back and reconfigured. Analyses of the Shifting Vision for Russia’s Space Future For Roscosmos describe how the agency has moved from grand plans for a cutting-edge complex to a more improvised scheme that leans heavily on modules that have already been in orbit for decades, often problematic pieces of hardware that were never designed to be the nucleus of a new station.
That shift has also played out in public messaging, where officials oscillate between touting ROSS as a high-tech platform and defending the decision to reuse old modules as a sensible form of thrift. A separate strand of commentary asks more bluntly According to the report published in Universe Today whether this marks a significant departure from Roscosmos’s earlier ambitions and whether the new station, if it comes together, will be more of a stopgap than a true successor to the ISS. In that light, the recycling plan looks less like a bold innovation and more like a political necessity dressed up as a visionary move.
How the plan would actually work in orbit
Turning the recycling concept into reality would require a complex choreography in orbit, and that is where the engineering challenges become very concrete. To detach Russian modules from the ISS, controllers would have to carefully sequence undocking operations, manage the station’s attitude and ensure that the remaining structure stays stable and safe for the international partners who will still be on board. Discussions of how for years, there have been plans to use Russian ISS modules on their new space station highlight that this is not a simple plug-and-play operation but a delicate process that would have to be coordinated with the overall deorbiting strategy for the ISS.
Once detached, the modules would need their own propulsion and power to maneuver into a new orbit and maintain operations, which raises another set of questions. Enthusiasts and skeptics alike have debated issues like how Russia will provide electricity once its modules are no longer connected to the ISS’s large solar arrays, with one online discussion framed around How will they provide electricity and noting that, as far as participants know, the massive solar panels belong to the US segment. Unless Russia can attach new power modules quickly, its recycled station would be starting life with a serious energy deficit, which would limit both safety margins and scientific output.
Domestic irritation and international skepticism
The recycling plan has not only drawn technical criticism, it has also stirred political irritation at home and skepticism abroad. In Russia, some observers have pointed out that earlier statements about the condition and future of the ISS modules now sit awkwardly alongside the idea of reusing them, leading to what one report described as an Older statement causes irritation moment. That phrase captures the sense that officials are being forced to retrofit their narrative to justify a plan that was driven more by necessity than by long-term strategy.
Outside Russia, the reaction has often mixed bemusement with concern. Commentators have argued that Russia is about to do the most Russia thing ever with its next space station, a line that reflects both the country’s reputation for rugged improvisation and the perception that it is being backed into a corner by sanctions and economic strain. When I weigh those reactions against the technical record of the Russian Orbital Segment, it is hard to escape the conclusion that the international community sees the recycling plan as a gamble that could either preserve Russia’s human spaceflight program or saddle it with a fragile, failure-prone outpost.
Industrial capacity and software: can Russia actually build the rest?
Even if the ISS modules can be safely detached and kept alive, ROSS will still need new components, and that raises questions about Russia’s industrial capacity under sanctions. The station project is already driving changes in how Russian industry manages complex engineering programs, including the adoption of domestic product lifecycle management tools. Documentation on the Use of Russian PLM during development notes that Roscosmos ordered software development from Rosatom to support the project, a sign that the agency is trying to reduce dependence on foreign digital tools as it designs and builds new modules.
At the same time, Russia’s broader station plans have been buffeted by economic shocks and shifting priorities, which have already forced the abandonment of some earlier configurations. Analyses of how Russia’s ambitious plans for the Russian Orbital Station have evolved describe a trajectory from a showcase of Russian technology to a more constrained project that must make do with limited resources. When I put that alongside the need to design, test and launch new power, docking and habitation modules to complement the recycled ISS elements, it becomes clear that industrial capacity is just as critical a bottleneck as the condition of the old hardware in orbit.
What success would look like, and what failure would cost
If Russia manages to pull this off, the payoff would be significant. A functioning ROSS built partly from recycled ISS modules would allow Moscow to maintain a continuous human presence in low Earth orbit, support national security and Earth observation missions and preserve a measure of prestige in a domain where it has deep historical roots. Visualizations of how Russia unexpectedly revealed New Space Station after the International Space Station is nearing the end of its operational life show a complex that, at least in concept, could host cosmonauts, conduct experiments and serve as a platform for observing the whole country from orbit.
The flip side is that failure would be costly, both materially and symbolically. If the recycled modules prove too fragile, or if new components arrive late or underperform, Russia could find itself with a station that is unsafe, underpowered or simply not worth the expense of maintaining. Analyses that ask whether Russia’s Next Space Station Could Reuse Its ISS Parts and still function as a reliable orbital habitat for its cosmonauts underscore that the stakes are not just about saving money but about the safety of crews and the credibility of Russia’s space program. In that sense, the decision to recycle ISS modules is less a clever shortcut than a high-stakes bet on the country’s ability to keep old machines alive in one of the harshest environments humans have ever operated in.
So, can the recycling plan really work?
When I weigh the technical, financial and political factors, I see a plan that is not impossible but is stacked with risks that other spacefaring nations have chosen to avoid. The ISS has shown that careful maintenance can extend the life of orbital hardware far beyond its original design, and Russia’s long experience with modular stations like Mir gives its engineers a deep well of expertise. At the same time, the documented leaks, structural fatigue and age of key modules like ISS components in the Russian segment mean that any new station built around them will start with a handicap that cannot be wished away by patriotic rhetoric or clever branding.
Ultimately, whether Russia’s recycling strategy can work will depend on factors that are only partly technical: sustained funding in a strained economy, the ability to field new power and support modules on time, and the political will to prioritize long-term reliability over short-term symbolism. Analyses that frame the project as Space & Spaceflight policy rather than just engineering capture that broader context, in which ROSS is as much about signaling resilience as it is about science. From where I sit, the plan can work in a narrow, technical sense if everything goes right, but the margin for error is thin, and the cost of getting it wrong could be a lost decade for Russia’s human spaceflight program.
More from MorningOverview