Russia is no longer content with short lunar flybys or one-off landers. Its space agency now wants to anchor a permanent foothold on the Moon by building a nuclear power plant capable of riding out the 336-hour polar night that would shut down ordinary solar arrays. The project, framed as a joint effort with China, is designed to keep rovers, laboratories and life-support systems running through the longest blackout in the Solar System.
Instead of treating the Moon as a symbolic destination, Moscow is treating it as infrastructure, betting that a compact reactor buried in regolith could power an entire research base by the mid-2030s. If that schedule holds, the first nuclear grid off Earth would not be American or Chinese, but Russian, and it would reshape both the geopolitics and the engineering of deep space exploration.
Why Russia is betting on nuclear power for the Moon
At the heart of the plan is a simple constraint: the Moon’s day-night cycle is brutal. A single lunar night lasts roughly 336 hours, which means solar panels sit idle for about two weeks at a time while temperatures plunge and batteries drain. Russian planners argue that a nuclear reactor is the only realistic way to guarantee continuous electricity for a permanent base, since even vast solar farms and energy storage systems would struggle to bridge that gap at high latitudes on The Moon.
Roscosmos officials have framed the project as a cornerstone of a long term lunar presence, not a one-off stunt. The nuclear plant is intended to supply energy for a joint Russia–China research station, keeping rovers, laboratories and core infrastructure alive during the long nights that restrict solar power, a goal detailed in technical outlines of the planned lunar nuclear plant. For Moscow, which has decades of experience operating compact reactors in submarines and remote Arctic outposts, exporting that expertise to the lunar surface is both a technological flex and a strategic necessity.
Roscosmos, China and the race to build a joint lunar base
The nuclear project is not a stand-alone vanity build, it is the backbone of a broader Russian–Chinese plan for an International Scientific Lunar Station. Russia’s state space corporation, Roscosmos, has said it aims to complete construction of a lunar power facility to support a joint base, with the reactor expected to be in place by around 2035 or 2036 to power the station and future crewed missions to land on the Moon, according to detailed statements on Roscosmos plans. Chinese partners are expected to contribute landers, surface infrastructure and scientific payloads, while Russia focuses on heavy launchers and the reactor itself.
The joint station is also a geopolitical answer to the United States and its Artemis coalition. Competition in the field of lunar exploration of the PRC and Russia is made up of the United States, which also seeks to increase its presence on the Moon as part of the Artemis lunar program, as outlined in planning documents for the International Scientific Lunar Station. By tying its nuclear ambitions to a shared base with the PRC, Moscow is signaling that it intends to remain a first tier space power, even as Western sanctions and launch failures have eroded its dominance in low Earth orbit.
From Luna-25 failure to a nuclear comeback strategy
Russia’s renewed lunar push is happening in the shadow of a very public setback. The Luna program, once a Cold War jewel, stumbled when the Luna-25 mission failed during a landing attempt near the Moon’s south pole, a blow that highlighted how far the country had fallen behind newer players. Officials now present the nuclear reactor initiative as part of a broader effort to regain status in space exploration, with plans to deploy a reactor on the Moon by the mid-2030s described as a way to move beyond the Luna-25 mishap and reassert technical leadership, a narrative laid out in analyses of Russia’s Lunar Ambition.
That ambition is not just about prestige, it is also about proving that Russia can still deliver complex, high risk engineering projects under pressure. Commentators inside the country have framed the lunar reactor as a test of whether the national space sector, led by Roscosmos, can adapt after sanctions, budget cuts and the Luna-25 crash. The plan to deploy a nuclear power plant on the Moon by 2036, described in technical summaries cited by The Jerusalem Post, is being sold domestically as proof that the country still has the scientific depth to compete with the PRC and the United States in the most demanding corner of spaceflight.
Engineering a reactor that can survive 336-hour lunar nights
Designing a nuclear plant for the Moon is not as simple as bolting a submarine reactor onto a lander. Engineers must contend with extreme temperature swings, abrasive dust, vacuum, and the 336-hour darkness that defines the lunar night at many latitudes. For a permanent lunar presence, consistent energy is non negotiable, and the Moon’s environment presents a unique challenge for power systems, a point underscored in technical reviews of how any long term base must be built around robust generation and storage on Moon Within a Decade.
Russian planners have floated concepts that include burying reactor modules under regolith for radiation shielding, using heat pipes to move thermal energy to surface radiators, and pairing the reactor with energy storage to smooth out load spikes from rovers and laboratories. The proposed plant would be expected to supply continuous energy to lunar rovers, scientific observatories and core infrastructure, even during the Moon’s long dark nights, a capability highlighted in public briefings that describe the station’s power system as the key to surviving the 336 hour blackout, as seen in a detailed project overview.
What the plant will power: rovers, labs and life support
The nuclear station is being sized not just to keep a single habitat warm, but to run an entire research campus. Russian statements describe a grid that would feed power to rovers scouting for water ice, fixed observatories watching the cosmos from radio quiet craters, and laboratories processing samples on site rather than shipping everything back to Earth. The proposed plant would be expected to supply continuous energy to lunar rovers, scientific observatories and core infrastructure, including communications and thermal control systems that must never shut down, a role spelled out in video explainers on how Russia has announced plans to build a power plant on the Moon.
In that vision, the reactor becomes the beating heart of a small lunar city, enabling experiments that are impossible during the long night if power is rationed. Continuous electricity would let scientists run cryogenic instruments, 3D print spare parts, and operate drilling rigs through the darkness, while also supporting life support systems for any future crews. The plant is intended to supply energy for a joint Russia–China lunar research station, keeping all of these systems running during the long nights that restrict solar power, a mission profile described in detail by energy analysts examining the plant’s intended role.
A decade-long timeline and the politics behind it
Russian officials have repeatedly talked about a roughly ten year horizon for the project, presenting it as a realistic but ambitious schedule. Public briefings describe plans to build a nuclear power plant on the Moon within a Decade, with the goal of supporting long term lunar missions and a Chinese International Lunar Research Station, a timeline that has been echoed in technical commentary on how Russia to Build Nuclear Power Plant fits into the broader station schedule. Roscosmos has separately said it aims to deploy the plant on the Moon by 2036, aligning the reactor’s arrival with the expected build out of surface modules and logistics chains.
Behind the dates is a political calculation. In a bid to restore its space prowess, the Russian space agency Roscosmos announced plans to construct a lunar power plant as part of a wider effort to show that the country can still deliver flagship projects despite sanctions and competition, a framing that appears in coverage of how the Russian Roscosmos leadership is selling the project at home. The timeline also positions Moscow to claim a symbolic victory if it can switch on a reactor before rival Artemis bases reach full operational status, turning the first off world nuclear grid into a diplomatic calling card.
How this fits into the wider lunar power and climate story
Russian planners are also framing the lunar reactor as part of a broader narrative about energy and climate. Analyses of the project point out that the Moon plays a key role in stabilizing Earth’s climate by moderating its axial wobble and generating ocean tides, and that building infrastructure there is increasingly seen as a way to support long term scientific monitoring of Earth’s systems and to test technologies that could later be used in remote or harsh environments at home, a link drawn in assessments of how the moon plays a key role in strategic partnerships and technological developments.
At the same time, the project underscores how nuclear power remains central to Russia’s identity as an energy superpower. Commentators have noted that the same country that exports reactors to emerging markets now wants to export that model to the lunar surface, using it to anchor a new kind of energy diplomacy with the PRC. The initiative comes as Russia aims to regain its status in space exploration, following the Luna-25 setback, and to position itself in the strategic competition around the Moon, particularly against China and the United States, a dynamic explored in depth in discussions of Russia’s Lunar Ambition.
Global reactions, safety fears and the new space race
Outside Russia and the PRC, the idea of a nuclear reactor on the Moon has triggered a mix of fascination and unease. Commentators have compared the project to something out of a Bond film, noting that a joint Russian–Chinese nuclear plant on the Moon sounds like a mad science project that would once have been confined to fiction, a tone captured in broadcast segments that urge viewers to brace themselves as they describe how Russia and China plan to build such a facility. Critics worry about what would happen if a launch carrying reactor components failed, or if debris from a lunar accident eventually intersected Earth’s orbit, even though the technical risk assessments remain sparse in public.
Supporters counter that nuclear power is already used safely in space, from radioisotope generators on deep space probes to reactors tested in orbit during the Cold War, and that the Moon’s lack of atmosphere and distance from Earth make it a relatively safe place to host a compact plant. They also point out that Russia has decades of experience operating nuclear powered icebreakers and submarines, and that its state space corporation Roscosmos has framed the lunar reactor as an extension of that expertise, as reflected in policy briefs on Lunar Power Ambitions. Still, the project is unfolding in a crowded field, with the United States and its Artemis partners racing to establish their own bases, and with global attention focused on how major powers will manage nuclear technology beyond Earth.
What this means for Russia’s place in space
For Moscow, the lunar nuclear plant is as much about status as it is about science. The country that once launched Sputnik and Yuri Gagarin has seen its space profile erode, but it still commands significant technical and industrial capacity, from heavy rockets to nuclear engineering, as reflected in broad profiles of Russia and its strategic sectors. By staking a claim to the first full scale nuclear grid on another world, it is trying to reframe the narrative from one of decline to one of adaptation, even as it leans on a partnership with the PRC to share costs and risks.
Whether the project succeeds on the proposed timeline will depend on factors that go far beyond engineering, including sanctions, budget priorities in Moscow and Beijing, and the pace of competing efforts under Artemis. In a bid to restore its space prowess, Roscosmos has made clear that it sees the lunar plant as a flagship project, but it is not alone in its ambitions, as other powers race to secure their own footholds on the Moon, a reality highlighted in coverage that notes Russia is not alone in its ambitions. If the reactor does switch on by the mid-2030s, it will mark a turning point in how humanity powers itself beyond Earth, and in how nuclear technology is wielded as a tool of both exploration and influence.
More from MorningOverview