Russia is no longer content with drones that buzz like insects or glide like aircraft. Its latest experiment reaches inside the brains of living birds, wiring pigeons with neural implants so human operators can steer them through the sky. The project turns an ordinary city staple into a guided “biodrone,” raising sharp questions about how far states are willing to go in blending biology and machines for surveillance and war.
At the center of this effort is a Russian neurotechnology company that has begun testing brain-controlled pigeons in real-world flight conditions, reportedly in and around Moscow. The work is still experimental, but the basic concept is already clear: electrodes in a bird’s brain respond to remote commands, nudging it left or right, up or down, without the need for traditional training or onboard autopilots.
Inside Russia’s brain‑pigeon experiment
The core of the story is simple and unsettling. A Russian neurotechnology firm called Neiry has implanted electrodes into pigeons and then guided their flight remotely, effectively turning them into controllable platforms that can be steered like slow, feathered drones. According to descriptions of recent tests, the company has already conducted flight trials in Moscow, using a brain interface to direct the birds’ movements while they carry small payloads or follow preplanned paths that would be difficult for a human handler to enforce through conventional training alone, a capability highlighted in reports on a Russian neurotechnology firm Neiry.
Neiry’s approach relies on a neurointerface kit that taps directly into the pigeons’ nervous systems, bypassing the slow and uncertain process of conditioning animals to respond to whistles, food, or visual cues. Instead, tiny electrodes stimulate specific brain regions associated with orientation and movement, and the bird reacts as if it had chosen the direction itself. Reporting on this system describes how a Russian company named Neiry has developed a kit that turns regular pigeons into “bio-drones,” with tiny implanted electrodes guiding the animals without the need for behavioral training, a leap that shifts control from instinct to circuitry.
From lab kit to “biodrone” weapon system
What begins as a neurotechnology demonstration quickly takes on a military flavor once the pigeons are framed as “biodrones.” Neiry’s system is not pitched merely as a scientific curiosity, but as a platform that can carry sensors or small devices into places where conventional drones might be too loud, too visible, or too easily jammed. The birds, already adapted to urban skylines and human presence, become stealth carriers whose flight paths can be subtly altered by remote operators using the implanted interface. This is not just about proving that electrodes can move a winged body, it is about showing that a living animal can be slotted into the same tactical role as a quadcopter or fixed‑wing unmanned aircraft.
The concept has been formalized in the language of defense technology through the label “bird-biodrones,” with one reported codename, PJN-1, attached to ordinary pigeons that have been surgically fitted with neural chips. These PJN-1 birds are described as capable of being steered toward specific targets or routes, with technicians using the implants to override natural navigation and turn the pigeons into controllable assets for reconnaissance, infrastructure monitoring, or even airport security scenarios. Coverage of these PJN bird-biodrones emphasizes that they are still biologically normal pigeons, but their brains now host chips that make them part of a larger remote‑control system.
VLADIMIR Putin’s interest in animal‑based spying
Once pigeons are framed as controllable biodrones, it is no surprise that the project is being linked to Russia’s broader appetite for unconventional surveillance tools. Reports describe how VLADIMIR Putin’s scientists have launched a squadron of remote controlled spy pigeons fitted with brain implants, suggesting that the Kremlin sees value in a fleet of living birds that can slip through air defenses, perch on rooftops, and blend into city skylines while quietly relaying data. The language of a “squadron” is telling, hinting at an organized, repeatable capability rather than a one‑off experiment, and it places these pigeons in the same conceptual category as other military assets that can be deployed in numbers for reconnaissance or deception.
The association with VLADIMIR Putin also signals that this is not just a fringe lab project, but part of a national ecosystem that has long experimented with animals in military roles, from naval mammals to dogs trained for explosives. In this case, the twist is that the pigeons are not simply trained, they are wired, and the implants give human operators a direct channel into their navigation systems. Reporting that Putin’s scientists have launched these remote controlled spy pigeons underscores how quickly a neurotechnology prototype can be reframed as a strategic tool once it reaches the attention of national leadership.
How the brain‑chip control actually works
At the technical level, the control system hinges on implanted electrodes that stimulate or read neural activity in regions of the pigeon brain tied to orientation and reward. When an operator sends a command, the chip delivers a pattern of electrical impulses that the bird’s nervous system interprets as a cue to turn, climb, or descend. Over repeated flights, the pigeon’s brain learns to associate these impulses with movement, but the key point is that the signal originates from a remote human, not from the bird’s own sensory input. This is why Neiry can claim to steer pigeons without traditional conditioning, relying instead on a direct neurointerface that bypasses the slow feedback loop of treats and punishments.
Descriptions of the system emphasize that the electrodes are tiny, minimizing weight and allowing the birds to fly with relatively normal agility while still carrying small payloads or sensors. The neurointerface kit developed by the Russian company Neiry is presented as a modular package that can be fitted to regular pigeons, turning them into bio-drones that respond to remote commands without the need for months of behavioral training. In practice, this means a handler can use a control unit to send signals that the tiny implanted electrodes translate into neural cues, effectively piloting the bird through a cityscape or across open terrain.
Why Russia wants pigeons instead of plastic drones
From a strategic standpoint, pigeons offer several advantages over conventional unmanned aerial vehicles. They are naturally common in cities, so a single bird circling a government building or industrial site is unlikely to draw attention in the way a buzzing quadcopter might. They do not rely on GPS or radio links in the same way as plastic drones, which makes them less vulnerable to jamming or spoofing, and their organic flight patterns can blend into the background of urban wildlife. For a state actor looking to gather imagery, test defenses, or deliver small payloads in contested airspace, a flock of controllable pigeons becomes an appealing, if unsettling, option.
Reports on Russia’s first brain‑chipped bird drones describe how implanted electrodes are used to guide pigeons along specific routes, with the birds effectively serving as low‑cost, low‑signature platforms for surveillance or city monitoring. One account notes that Russia has reportedly tested its first brain chipped bird drones that use implanted electrodes to guide pigeons, presenting them as part of a broader wave of deeptech investing in drone technology and AI trends. The description of these brain chipped bird drones highlights potential uses in city monitoring and security, where a living bird can slip through spaces that might be off‑limits or dangerous for human agents and conventional machines.
PJN-1 and the codification of “bird‑biodrones”
The codename PJN-1 signals that Russia’s pigeon project is being treated like a formal system, not just a one‑off experiment. Assigning a designation to the so‑called bird-biodrones suggests a roadmap for iterations, upgrades, and perhaps export versions, much as traditional weapons programs move from prototypes to numbered models. PJN-1 pigeons are described as ordinary birds that have been implanted with neural chips, giving technicians the ability to steer them toward specific locations or patterns of movement that would be difficult to achieve through natural homing alone. The codename also helps integrate the birds into bureaucratic and military planning, where systems are tracked, funded, and evaluated under specific labels.
Accounts of PJN-1 emphasize that these bird-biodrones can be used in environments where security concerns are rising, including airports and sensitive infrastructure. The idea is that a pigeon fitted with a neural chip can be directed to fly through approach paths, around runways, or near critical facilities, gathering data on how air traffic and security systems respond. In some descriptions, PJN-1 birds are framed as tools for monitoring airports with rising security concerns, a role that underscores how a living animal can be repurposed as a sensor platform once its brain is wired into a control network. The reference to PJN bird-biodrones captures this shift from urban nuisance to instrument of surveillance.
Military analysts see a new kind of drone race
Outside Russia, defense analysts are already treating the pigeon project as part of a broader competition over novel drone technologies. The use of brain implants in animals sits alongside swarming micro‑drones, loitering munitions, and AI‑driven reconnaissance systems as one more way states are trying to outmaneuver each other in the air. In this context, Russia’s decision to pioneer remote controlled spy pigeons fitted with brain implants is seen as both a technological experiment and a signaling move, a way to show that it is willing to explore unconventional tools that blur the line between biology and machinery.
One account notes that Russia is pioneering remote controlled spy pigeons fitted with brain implants, with the decision coming just days after commentary from a military analyst, Michael Clarke, who has been cited in discussions about how such technologies might fit into future conflicts. The framing of these pigeons as part of Russia’s drone portfolio, rather than as a standalone curiosity, is important. It suggests that the birds are being evaluated alongside other unmanned systems for roles in reconnaissance, deception, and potentially even strike missions, depending on what payloads they can carry. The reference to Russia pioneering remote controlled spy pigeons underscores that this is being watched as a strategic development, not just a scientific oddity.
Ethical fault lines and public unease
Beyond the technical and military implications, the idea of brain‑implanted pigeons touches a raw nerve in public debates about animal rights and neurotechnology. Turning a living bird into a remote platform raises questions about consent, suffering, and the limits of human control over other species. Even if the implants are described as tiny and minimally invasive, the fact remains that the pigeons’ natural behavior is being overridden by external commands, effectively subordinating their instincts to a human operator’s joystick. For many observers, this crosses a line from training animals to exploiting them as hardware.
The ethical concerns are amplified by the secrecy that typically surrounds military research. While companies like Neiry present their work as cutting‑edge neurotechnology, the details of how the pigeons are treated, how long they live after implantation, and what safeguards exist against abuse are rarely disclosed in full. The framing of these birds as PJN-1 biodrones or as part of a squadron of spy pigeons under VLADIMIR Putin’s scientists only deepens the unease, because it suggests that the primary goal is not scientific understanding but operational advantage. In that light, the pigeons become symbols of a broader trend in which living creatures are folded into the machinery of surveillance and conflict without a clear public debate about the moral cost.
What comes after pigeons
If Russia can steer pigeons with brain implants, the obvious question is what species might be next. Larger birds such as crows, ravens, or even seagulls could carry heavier payloads or more sophisticated sensors, while their natural intelligence might make them even more adaptable to complex environments. The same neurointerface principles could, in theory, be applied to other animals that already have a history of military use, from dogs to marine mammals, turning them into hybrid systems that combine biological resilience with digital control. Each step in that direction would deepen the integration of living bodies into the architecture of modern warfare.
For now, the focus remains on pigeons, in part because they are abundant, hardy, and already comfortable in the urban spaces where surveillance and security concerns are most acute. The tests conducted by the Russian neurotechnology firm Neiry in Moscow, the development of a neurointerface kit with tiny electrodes, the codename PJN-1 for bird-biodrones, and the reports of VLADIMIR Putin’s scientists launching a squadron of remote controlled spy pigeons all point to a single trajectory. Russia is experimenting with a future in which the line between drone and animal is no longer clear, and where the flutter of wings overhead might signal not just a city’s wildlife, but a state’s watchful eye.
More from MorningOverview