Runaway climate shocks are no longer a distant scenario in economic models, they are starting to show up in balance sheets, household incomes and sovereign risk assessments. As warming accelerates and protective policies lag, the world is staring at potential losses measured not in billions but in tens of trillions of dollars. The question I keep returning to is not whether the global economy can afford faster climate action, but whether it can survive without it.
Early climate shocks are colliding with a fragile global economy
The basic physics of climate change have not changed, but the pace of damage clearly has. Scientists now warn that global temperatures are rising faster than many earlier projections, in part because cuts in air pollution are stripping away a hidden cooling effect that once masked some of the warming. As those aerosols decline, the planet is heating more quickly, and that accelerates the arrival of extreme events that strain food systems, infrastructure and public finances, a trend highlighted by Experts who have sounded the climate alarm.
Economists who track systemic risk are starting to talk less about gradual warming and more about solvency. Former UK climate adviser David King has argued that Governments need to agree on a planetary solvency plan quickly, warning that sooner than expected climate impacts could cost the world trillions of dollars in lost output and destroyed assets. In that analysis, a first step is to align global investment so that growth can outpace those damages, a point underscored in recent work on sooner-than-expected climate impacts.
Corporate balance sheets and household incomes are already shrinking
For companies, the bill for a hotter, more volatile climate is no longer hypothetical. Analysts have estimated that Climate Change Will Cost Companies $1.3 Trillion by 2026, a figure that reflects disrupted supply chains, damaged facilities and shifting consumer demand. That number is not just about flooded factories or burned warehouses, it also captures the cost of complying with new regulations, retooling products for a low carbon market and facing higher insurance premiums in risk exposed regions.
The pain is not confined to boardrooms. A new study finds that climate change has already cut U.S. incomes by about 12 percent, with nationwide temperature changes disrupting productivity, agriculture and health. That means workers are effectively poorer than they would have been in a stable climate, even before factoring in future shocks, a reality captured in recent research on shrinking incomes. When I look at those numbers, I see a quiet erosion of living standards that rarely makes headlines but will shape politics and social stability for decades.
Disasters are stacking up into trillion dollar liabilities
Extreme weather is the most visible face of this economic shock, and the ledger is sobering. As of December, the United States alone has sustained 426 separate weather and climate disasters with a total cost exceeding $3.1 trillion, with all costs CPI Adjusted to reflect the Consumer Price Index. Each of those events, from hurricanes to wildfires, leaves behind not just physical wreckage but municipal debt, higher insurance rates and lost tax revenue that can linger for years.
Globally, the pattern is similar. One recent assessment found that extreme weather’s economic toll has reached about $2 trillion over the last decade, a figure that reflects a world economy under strain as climate impacts intensify. Looking ahead, projections suggest that costs for climate disasters could reach $145 billion in 2025, with Extreme weather alone expected to cause about $145 billion in damage in a single year. When I map those numbers against public budgets, it is clear that disaster response is quietly becoming one of the largest unfunded liabilities on the planet.
Models are underestimating risk, while policy choices add fuel
One of the most troubling threads in the latest research is the suggestion that even these eye watering figures may be conservative. A report co authored by Dr Jesse Abrams from Exeter, working with the Green Futures Solutions team and the Global Systems Institute, warns that underestimates in global warming pose major climate and financial risks. The authors argue that if warming is higher than many models assume, then asset valuations, pension funds and sovereign debt markets are all mispricing the material risks that are faced, a concern laid out in detail in the Exeter analysis.
Policy choices are compounding that vulnerability. In the United States, President Donald Trump’s climate rollbacks are being scrutinized not only as environmental setbacks but as sources of structural economic risk. According to an annual analysis of disaster losses and insurance coverage, the economic effects of climate change extend far beyond immediate recovery costs, with one recent year seeing insurers cover around $108bn while taxpayers and uninsured households absorbed the rest. By weakening standards that would cut emissions and harden infrastructure, the administration is effectively baking more of that uncovered risk into the economy, a dynamic explored in depth in a recent analysis of those rollbacks.
The solvency plan: invest now or pay $38 Trillion every year
If the costs of inaction are exploding, the scale of the response has to match. Climate finance tracking shows that in 2021 and 2022, CPI estimated global investment in climate action at about 1.3 trillion in USD, a figure that sounds large until it is set against the trillions at risk. The same work from CPI stresses that the world needs to increase investment in a net zero transition without delay, as every year of underinvestment locks in higher future losses and deeper inequality, a point made starkly in its assessment of the cost of inaction and the role of the UNFCCC in mobilizing capital.
The alternative is a world where climate damage becomes a permanent drag on growth. One recent study projects that Climate Change Will Cost Global Economy $38 Trillion Every Year Within 25 Years, a warning that scientists frame not as a distant apocalypse but as a baseline outcome if emissions stay high. When I weigh that against the earlier estimate that Climate Change Will Cost Global Economy Trillion Every Year Within the coming Years, as Scientists Warn in work reported by Hart, the message is brutally clear. Either Governments heed David King’s call for a planetary solvency plan and scale up investment now, or runaway climate shocks will keep arriving early, slamming the world with losses that make today’s disasters look like a down payment.
More from Morning Overview
