New York is tightening its grip on autonomous vehicle testing just as Waymo pushes to expand, creating a regulatory collision between the state’s taxi and for-hire driver unions and the biggest name in robotaxis. With multiple bills in Albany and City Hall aiming to either ban or heavily restrict driverless ride services, and key testing permits set to expire in spring 2026, the fight over who controls New York’s streets is intensifying.
Waymo’s Tight Leash in New York City
Waymo currently operates under one of the most restrictive autonomous vehicle testing regimes in the country. According to the city transportation department, the company’s permit allows a fleet of just eight vehicles, confined to Manhattan south of 112th Street. The permit runs through March 31, 2026, and New York State law requires an in-vehicle test operator at all times when AV technology is in operation. That means Waymo cannot offer truly driverless rides in the city, a sharp contrast to its operations in Phoenix and San Francisco, where passengers regularly ride without a human behind the wheel.
The city layered additional requirements on top of the state mandate. When Mayor Adams opened permit applications for AV testing, the mayor’s office stressed that companies must coordinate with the NYPD and FDNY, submit ongoing data reports, and keep a trained safety driver in every vehicle. The city’s framework treats autonomous vehicles less like a commercial product and more like an experiment under surveillance. For Waymo, this means New York generates test data but zero revenue from driverless fares, limiting its ability to demonstrate the economics of a robotaxi service in one of the world’s most important transportation markets.
State Rules and a Looming Expiration
The state-level testing program adds another layer of constraint. The state motor vehicle agency requires any AV tester to carry $5 million in insurance, maintain a licensed driver in the driver’s seat ready to take control, file a law-enforcement interaction plan, and submit a report to the Commissioner by March 1, 2026. These are not casual paperwork requirements. They reflect a state government that has kept autonomous vehicles on a short leash since first authorizing testing, treating every mile driven as a supervised trial rather than a commercial rollout, and giving regulators detailed visibility into how the technology performs on public roads.
The enabling law behind this entire testing framework is set to expire on April 1, 2026. If Albany does not renew or replace it, the legal basis for any AV testing on New York roads disappears entirely. That deadline gives unions and skeptical lawmakers significant leverage: doing nothing achieves the same result as passing a ban. Meanwhile, New York is backing away from robotaxi pilots upstate, further narrowing the geography where autonomous vehicles can operate. The combination of a sunset clause and shrinking test zones sends a clear signal that the default trajectory is retrenchment, not rapid commercialization.
Competing Bills Draw Battle Lines
The legislative picture in Albany is split between two fundamentally opposed visions. One Senate proposal would authorize fully autonomous vehicles without a human driver under defined conditions, including new definitions for the technology and an insurance framework. If passed, it would represent the first time New York law explicitly allowed driverless operation on public roads, potentially opening the door for companies like Waymo to move from supervised testing to commercial service. Supporters frame this as a way to keep New York competitive with other states that have already welcomed driverless fleets.
But that bill faces a direct counterweight in another Senate measure, S2688, introduced on January 22, 2025, which provides that no autonomous vehicle may be used for taxi, livery, or transportation network company services. The two bills cannot coexist, and their simultaneous presence in the Senate signals that neither side has the votes to force a resolution. At the city level, the New York City Council introduced a council bill that would require the Taxi and Limousine Commission to license and regulate autonomous taxis. Rather than banning robotaxis outright, this local proposal assumes driverless taxis will eventually arrive but insists the TLC, the same agency that oversees yellow cabs and app-based car services, must control the terms.
Union Pressure and the Lobbying Trail
Groups representing drivers of taxis and for-hire vehicles have strongly opposed robotaxis, and their influence is visible across every layer of New York’s regulatory response. The insistence on safety drivers, the geographic restrictions, and the reporting mandates all reflect priorities that labor groups have pushed for years. Their argument is straightforward: tens of thousands of drivers in New York depend on taxi and for-hire work, and allowing driverless vehicles to compete for those same passengers without a human operator threatens their livelihoods directly. That economic anxiety dovetails with public safety concerns, giving unions a potent narrative as they lobby state legislators and city council members.
Lobbying activity around these issues is substantial, though specific spending by individual companies and unions is difficult to isolate from public records. The statewide ethics commission has reported multimillion-dollar totals for transportation-related advocacy in recent cycles, and autonomous vehicles are now a regular feature in that mix. Unions have also cultivated grassroots pressure: drivers and fleet owners have appeared at hearings, staged rallies, and flooded city hotlines such as NYC 311 with complaints whenever new technology pilots are announced. This sustained political engagement helps explain why even exploratory AV programs in New York are wrapped in layers of oversight that do not exist in most other jurisdictions.
The High-Stakes Road Ahead for Robotaxis
For Waymo and its competitors, New York now represents both a prize and a warning. The dense, transit-rich streets of Manhattan are an ideal stress test for autonomous systems, and a successful deployment there would carry outsized symbolic weight. Yet the current regime, limited fleets, mandatory human operators, and looming statutory expiration, offers little path to a sustainable business. Companies must decide whether to keep investing in a market that may close entirely in 2026 or shift their focus to more permissive states, even as they recognize that winning over New York could shape national perceptions of the technology.
Policymakers, meanwhile, face a narrowing window to decide what kind of future they want on the streets. Renewing the state testing law without changes would preserve the status quo of supervised experiments, while adopting a framework like the one outlined on the city’s AV guidance page would keep New York firmly in the cautious camp. Embracing driverless operation for commercial services would require confronting union fears head-on and designing protections for displaced workers, potentially through retraining programs or caps on fleet sizes. However the debate resolves, the outcome will signal whether New York intends to shape the evolution of autonomous mobility or simply regulate it from the sidelines.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
