NASA and the Italian Space Agency achieved a first on the lunar surface earlier this year when their joint experiment locked onto Earth-based GPS signals from the Moon, producing a navigation fix that had never been done before. The success of the Lunar GNSS Receiver Experiment, known as LuGRE, aboard Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost lander has opened a concrete path toward building a positioning and timing infrastructure around the Moon. Paired with separate work on quantum clock synchronization and a proposed lunar time standard, the results suggest that precise navigation on and around the Moon is no longer theoretical but an active engineering problem with real deadlines.
First GPS Fix on the Lunar Surface
Blue Ghost touched down on March 2, 2025, and within hours LuGRE was already pulling in signals from Global Navigation Satellite System constellations designed to serve users on Earth, not a quarter-million miles away. Around 2 a.m. ET on March 3, the experiment achieved the first navigation fix using those signals on the Moon’s surface. That fix proved a receiver sitting in lunar regolith could determine its own position without relying on a dedicated deep-space tracking network, a capability that future Artemis crews and robotic missions will need if they are to operate with any independence from Earth-based ground controllers.
The achievement did not come out of nowhere. During cislunar transit weeks earlier, LuGRE was already acquiring GNSS signals and computed a navigation fix at approximately 331,000 km, roughly 52 Earth radii from the planet. That distance far exceeds the operational ceiling of any terrestrial GNSS constellation, which was built to serve receivers within about 36,000 km of the surface. The fact that usable signals reached the Moon at all, and that a receiver could decode them, changes the calculus for how agencies plan cislunar missions. Instead of requiring constant contact with the Deep Space Network, spacecraft could supplement their positioning data with repurposed GPS and Galileo signals already in orbit.
Why Lunar Clocks Run Fast
Navigation accuracy depends on timing, and timing on the Moon is not the same as timing on Earth. Because the Moon has weaker gravity, clocks on its surface tick faster by microseconds per day compared to identical clocks at sea level on Earth, a consequence of general relativity that Albert Einstein predicted more than a century ago. A peer-reviewed paper published in The Astronomical Journal laid out the relativistic framework and quantitative basis for these expected clock-rate differences, giving engineers the math they need to correct for the drift. Without those corrections, a microsecond-level error translates into hundreds of meters of positioning uncertainty, enough to send a lander into a crater wall instead of onto a flat landing pad.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology framed the problem in practical terms in a release titled “What Time Is It on the Moon?” NIST scientists outlined a proposed lunar timekeeping blueprint that could serve as the foundation for a GPS-like navigation system on and around the Moon. The concept draws on the same atomic-clock averaging techniques that keep UTC stable on Earth, but adapted for a body where relativity introduces a persistent and predictable offset. For anyone building hardware that must land, drive, or dock in lunar orbit, that offset is not an academic curiosity. It is a design constraint that shapes antenna timing, signal processing, and mission-critical software.
Coordinated Lunar Time Takes Shape
NASA has moved beyond theory. The agency published an explainer connecting a White House Office of Science and Technology Policy directive to concrete implementation steps for what it calls Coordinated Lunar Time, or LTC. The standard would be derived from a weighted average of atomic clocks placed on the lunar surface, analogous to how more than 400 atomic clocks on Earth contribute to Coordinated Universal Time. The distinction matters because LTC would give every mission, regardless of which country or company operates it, a shared temporal reference. Without that common clock, two rovers approaching the same waypoint could disagree about when they are supposed to arrive, creating collision risks that grow as traffic increases.
The broader challenge is synchronization across distance. As NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center noted in a September 2024 article on quantum clock synchronization, clocks become more out of sync over time, especially when separated by the roughly 384,000 km between Earth and the Moon. Researchers at Goddard’s Greenbelt, Maryland, lab are developing a quantum protocol that exploits entangled photon pairs to verify synchronization without relying solely on round-trip light signals. If the protocol scales, it could reduce the timing uncertainty that accumulates during the 1.3-second one-way light delay between Earth and the Moon, giving mission planners tighter control over precision landing windows and surface operations.
Multi-Constellation Signals Boost Coverage
LuGRE did not limit itself to American GPS satellites. A preprint posted to arXiv by researchers affiliated with the experiment reported post-processing of LuGRE’s in-phase and quadrature snapshots from multiple GNSS constellations in the lunar domain. The paper includes quantitative improvements in four-satellite visibility fractions under a stated acquisition threshold, meaning the receiver could see enough satellites simultaneously to compute a three-dimensional fix more often than a single-constellation approach would allow. That finding has direct implications for mission design: if planners can count on multi-constellation coverage, they can schedule critical maneuvers, such as powered descent or ascent to orbit, during periods when the sky geometry delivers the strongest signal geometry and lowest dilution of precision.
In practice, that means lunar navigation is likely to evolve into a hybrid architecture. Earth-orbiting GNSS constellations will provide a baseline layer of positioning and timing, augmented by dedicated lunar beacons, surface relays, and possibly low lunar orbit satellites broadcasting LTC-referenced signals. The LuGRE results show that even weak side-lobe emissions from Earth-focused satellites can be exploited when paired with sensitive receivers and sophisticated post-processing. As more nations and commercial operators send hardware to the Moon, a multi-constellation, multi-layer approach reduces single points of failure and creates redundancy that can keep crews safe even if one segment of the infrastructure suffers an outage.
From Demonstrations to an Operational Lunar Network
Turning these demonstrations into a reliable service will require more than clever engineering; it will demand coordination across agencies, companies, and countries. NASA has begun using outreach platforms such as its streaming hub to explain how navigation and timing fit into the broader Artemis campaign, emphasizing that communication links, surface power, and positioning services must be planned as shared infrastructure rather than bespoke add-ons for individual missions. By presenting LuGRE and related experiments alongside human spaceflight milestones, the agency is signaling that navigation and timing are central pillars of its lunar strategy, not niche technology projects.
That messaging extends into more in-depth programming, including documentary series that explore how GPS revolutionized life on Earth and how similar concepts might translate to the Moon. For engineers and policymakers, these narratives underscore a key lesson from the terrestrial experience: standards set early tend to persist for decades. Decisions now about how LTC is defined, how quantum-synchronized clocks are deployed, and how multi-constellation signals are integrated will shape what future astronauts, scientists, and commercial operators can do on the lunar surface. With LuGRE’s first fix in the books and theoretical work on relativistic timing maturing into concrete standards, the race is on to build a lunar navigation network that is as dependable for explorers in the 2030s as GPS is for smartphone users today.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
