The Old Farmer’s Almanac has released its March 2026 weather outlook covering all 50 states, projecting a split personality for the month: lingering winter cold across the Northeast and Midwest while the Southwest warms ahead of schedule. The forecast arrives as a potentially fading La Niña pattern adds a layer of uncertainty to how quickly spring conditions will take hold, creating a real tension between the almanac’s region-by-region predictions and the probability-based outlooks issued by federal climate scientists.
Southwest Warmth Versus Northeast Cold
The almanac’s state-by-state breakdown draws a sharp geographic line through the country. For the Northeast, the prediction is blunt: late winter conditions continue well into March, meaning residents from Maine to Pennsylvania should expect cold snaps and possible snow events rather than early crocuses. Travelers heading to New England for spring break may want to pack accordingly, as the almanac sees little relief from winter’s grip through the first half of the month, suggesting that ski areas and winter recreation businesses could squeeze out a few more weeks of seasonal traffic.
The opposite end of the country gets a very different forecast. “Warmer springlike weather is expected to arrive early this year across much of the Southwest, from Southern California to Texas,” according to the almanac’s broader spring outlook, with that early warmth extending into Kansas and Oklahoma as well. That pattern would give farmers and ranchers in the southern Plains a head start on spring planting but also raises questions about water demand in already arid regions, where irrigation and reservoir levels are closely watched. For outdoor enthusiasts, an early transition to mild, dry days in the Southwest could lengthen hiking and camping seasons, but it may also accelerate drying of vegetation ahead of the traditional wildfire period.
Midwest and Heartland Face a Slow Thaw
For states in the middle of the country, the Old Farmer’s Almanac and its rival, the Farmers’ Almanac, largely agree that March will not feel like spring. The Farmers’ Almanac describes “chilly, unsettled” conditions for the Midwest, with cool temperatures expected to linger from late March through mid-April before consistent warmth arrives. That slow warm-up carries real consequences for agriculture: late frosts can damage emerging crops, and prolonged cool and damp conditions raise the risk of fungal diseases in fields that farmers are eager to plant. Wisconsin, for example, is forecast to be drier than usual this spring, while Missouri faces similarly drier-than-usual conditions according to the Old Farmer’s Almanac, a combination that could help farmers get into fields earlier even as temperatures lag.
The Farmers’ Almanac, which divides the country into six forecast regions, has labeled its spring 2026 outlook a “sloth-like spring ahead,” warning gardeners not to rush tender plants outdoors. In Mississippi and parts of the lower Mississippi Valley, the forecast is more volatile, with predictions of high winds and tornadoes mixed into the spring weather pattern. That kind of severe weather risk in the Deep South, combined with the delayed warmth farther north, means March could be an especially tricky month for anyone making planting or travel decisions based on calendar dates alone. The Old Farmer’s Almanac also projects below-average conditions for the Intermountain West during the early spring months, suggesting that states like Utah, Idaho, and Montana will see winter hold on longer than usual, keeping mountain snowpack in place even as lower elevations begin to thaw.
La Niña’s Fading Influence Adds Uncertainty
Behind these regional forecasts sits a larger climate driver that complicates any prediction. As of January 8, 2026, La Niña conditions persisted in the tropical Pacific, according to the NOAA ENSO discussion, which tracks the Niño 3.4 index as a key measure of ocean temperature anomalies. That bulletin also noted odds for a transition to ENSO-neutral conditions during the January-to-March window, meaning the climate pattern that typically steers cooler, wetter weather into the northern United States could lose its influence right in the middle of the almanac’s forecast period. Such a transition can scramble expectations built on past La Niña years, because the atmosphere does not always respond in a neat, linear way as ocean temperatures change.
That shift matters because it introduces a wild card into any March outlook. La Niña tends to push the jet stream northward, bringing drier conditions to the southern tier and colder air to the northern states, but a weakening pattern may allow storm tracks to meander. If the background state moves toward neutral, the jet stream could shift in ways that neither the almanac’s historical-trend methodology nor short-range computer models fully capture. The Climate Prediction Center builds its monthly outlooks using dynamical models, atmospheric oscillation indices like the Arctic Oscillation and North Atlantic Oscillation, and broader ENSO context, producing probability maps rather than single-point forecasts. Regional experts, such as those at the University of Washington’s Climate Impacts Group, have already highlighted the CPC’s March 2026 outlook for the Pacific Northwest, underscoring that odds-based guidance can diverge from the deterministic tone of almanac predictions.
What “Normal” Actually Means in These Forecasts
When either the almanac or the CPC says temperatures will be “above normal” or “below normal,” they are measuring against a specific yardstick. The official U.S. Climate Normals cover the period 1991 to 2020, a 30-year average maintained by federal climate archives, and they are updated every decade to reflect the most recent climate baseline. Because the last several decades have trended warmer overall, “normal” today is not the same as it was in the mid-20th century; in many places, a March that would once have been considered unusually mild now falls closer to the average. That moving baseline can make it harder for the public to reconcile their memories of typical spring weather with technical terms used in forecasts.
NOAA’s climate communication efforts have tried to bridge this gap by explaining how these baselines and probabilities work in practice. A recent March outlook explainer for a prior year walks through how forecasters express odds of above- or below-normal conditions and why even a strong signal rarely translates to certainty. In that approach, a forecast of “warmer than normal” for March does not rule out cold snaps; it simply means that, over the whole month, temperatures are more likely to end up in the warmest third of the historical record. By contrast, the Old Farmer’s Almanac often phrases its guidance in more definitive terms—calling for specific periods of “cold and snowy” or “mild and dry”—which can sound more precise than the underlying science actually allows.
Balancing Almanac Tradition With Modern Climate Tools
For many readers, the appeal of the Old Farmer’s Almanac lies as much in tradition as in accuracy. The publication emphasizes its long history and proprietary formulas, drawing on historical analogs, solar cycles, and other factors to craft state-by-state narratives. Those narratives can be especially engaging for people planning events, gardening, or outdoor recreation, because they translate broad patterns into concrete expectations. Yet modern climate services offer a different kind of value: rather than promising a specific outcome, they provide tools to manage risk. The federal climate toolkit aggregates maps, datasets, and planning guides that help communities and businesses think through how a cooler-than-normal March or an early Southwest warm-up might affect everything from water supplies to public health.
Universities also play a growing role in connecting seasonal forecasts to real-world decisions. Institutions such as the University of Washington and its College of the Environment, which maintains the environmental sciences hub, translate national outlooks into region-specific guidance for fisheries, agriculture, and emergency management. Their analyses of CPC outlooks and evolving ENSO conditions help local officials understand when to treat an almanac prediction as a useful heads-up and when to lean more heavily on probabilistic model guidance. As March 2026 approaches, the contrast between a cold-holding Northeast and Midwest and an early-warming Southwest underscores a broader message: no single forecast can capture all the nuance, and the most resilient plans will blend traditional expectations, modern climate science, and an awareness that “normal” spring weather is itself a moving target.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
