Tiny flying robots have always faced a brutal trade-off between agility and battery life, burning through power just to stay aloft. A new wing architecture inspired by grasshoppers promises to ease that constraint, letting small machines switch from flapping to efficient gliding so they can travel much farther on a single charge. By copying how real insects unfold, stiffen, and ride the air, engineers are turning a biological trick into a practical tool for next‑generation micro air vehicles.
Instead of trying to outmuscle physics with bigger batteries or stronger motors, the research team focused on structure, asking how a wing only a few centimeters long could generate stable lift with minimal energy. Their answer, built from careful observation of grasshopper flight, is a 3D‑printed wing that locks into a load‑bearing shape in the air, then folds away when not needed. It is a small change in form that could have outsized impact on how we design search‑and‑rescue drones, environmental sensors, and even planetary scouts.
From grasshopper anatomy to robotic wings
The starting point for this work was not a wind tunnel but a field guide. Biologists and engineers teamed up to study how grasshoppers glide, focusing on the fine structure of their wings rather than the more obvious power of their legs. By dissecting and imaging the membranes, veins, and joints, the group identified specific structural characteristics that let the insect wings unfold rapidly, resist bending in flight, and then refold into a compact package, all while supporting efficient gliding locomotion. According to the collaboration described by Jan and colleagues, the key was not just surface area, but how stiffness and flexibility are distributed along the span.
Once those biological design rules were clear, the engineers translated them into a synthetic wing that could be fabricated in the lab. They recreated the pattern of reinforced veins and compliant hinges using lightweight materials and 3D printing, aiming for a structure that would snap into a gliding configuration under aerodynamic load. The resulting prototype, described as a grasshopper‑inspired gliding wing, was built to show that the same geometry that helps an insect coast between plants can also help a robot cover more ground without constant flapping. In the reporting from Jan and the engineering and life sciences team, the emphasis falls on how those structural traits directly contribute to efficient gliding flight.
How the new wing design boosts flight efficiency
At the heart of the advance is a simple energy argument: flapping is expensive, gliding is cheap. Small robots typically rely on continuous flapping or high‑speed rotors, which drain batteries quickly and limit mission time. By giving these machines wings that can shift into a stable gliding mode, the researchers allow them to alternate between powered strokes and passive coasting, much like a grasshopper that jumps, opens its wings, and then rides the air. Reporting on the project notes that the goal is to overcome a major limitation in robotic flight efficiency so that tiny aircraft can travel longer distances, all on a single charge, by exploiting this grasshopper‑style gliding mode.
To test whether the bioinspired structure actually delivered, the team compared their new wing to a more conventional design that resembles a simple rectangular plate. They mounted both versions on robotic platforms and evaluated aerodynamic performance in controlled conditions, measuring lift, drag, and stability. The grasshopper‑inspired wing showed clear advantages, maintaining smooth, sustained glides where the standard wing either stalled or required more active control. As they documented in lab comparisons, the structural cues borrowed from the insect wing translated into measurable gains in aerodynamic efficiency for the robotic system.
Inside the 3D‑printed structure that makes gliding possible
What makes this wing more than a scaled‑up insect part is the way its architecture has been tuned for fabrication and control. The researchers used 3D printing to embed vein‑like reinforcements and hinge‑like joints directly into the wing, creating a single piece that behaves differently in different regions. Near the root, the structure is stiff enough to carry load and transmit forces to the robot’s body. Toward the tip, it becomes more flexible, allowing subtle twist and camber changes that help stabilize the glide without complex actuators. The structural characteristics that emerged from the biological study were then recast as engineering parameters, a process that Jan and the Life Sciences Editor for Engineering and Life Sciences describe as a way to turn natural advantages into practical design rules.
Because the wing is printed as a monolithic part, it can be produced quickly and at low cost, which matters if these robots are to be deployed in swarms or in hazardous environments where loss is expected. The design also integrates with existing micro‑robot platforms, since it does not require exotic materials or new actuation schemes, only a way to switch between flapping and gliding regimes. That compatibility opens the door to retrofitting current systems with more efficient wings rather than starting from scratch. In the coverage of the project, Jan and collaborators highlight how the same structural template could be adapted to different scales and payloads, from centimeter‑scale scouts to slightly larger drones that still need to pack their wings tightly when not in use.
What longer‑flying tiny robots could actually do
Extending the range of small flying robots is not just an academic exercise, it directly affects what kinds of jobs these machines can take on. With more efficient wings, a micro air vehicle could spend less time fighting gravity and more time collecting data, whether that means sampling air quality over a city block, mapping vegetation in a remote field, or tracing gas leaks along a pipeline. The reporting on the project notes that the engineers are explicitly targeting multimodal locomotion for tiny robots, so that a single platform can hop, glide, and maneuver in tight spaces. By investigating how grasshoppers glide, the team has developed a model that could enable this kind of flexible movement for small robots that might one day monitor ecosystems or inspect infrastructure, a vision laid out in detail in Jan’s description of multimodal flight inspired by grasshoppers, dragonflies and butterflies.There are also clear implications for search and rescue, where tiny, long‑flying robots could slip through collapsed buildings or dense forests to locate survivors while human teams remain at a safer distance. In those scenarios, every extra minute of flight time matters, and the ability to glide between powered segments could be the difference between reaching a victim and running out of battery. The same logic applies to planetary exploration, where mass and energy budgets are brutally tight. A swarm of grasshopper‑inspired flyers could, in principle, cover more terrain on Mars or another world than a single heavy drone, precisely because each unit spends much of its time gliding. As Jan and researchers at Princeton emphasize, the central ambition is to help small robots fly longer by gliding like grasshoppers, turning a familiar insect maneuver into a new kind of robotic endurance.
More from Morning Overview