A February 2026 preprint proposes that tiny protein structures inside brain cells can sustain quantum entanglement and route quantum information, using the same mathematical framework physicists apply to describe how gravity shapes reality at the smallest scales. The paper adds fresh fuel to a decades-old debate over whether consciousness and the physical universe are governed by a shared quantum process. For years, that idea was dismissed as fringe speculation, but a growing body of theoretical work is forcing the scientific community to take a harder look.
How Brain Proteins Might Carry Quantum Information
The new preprint, posted to arXiv in February 2026, models quantum information flow in microtubule tryptophan networks. Microtubules are cylindrical protein scaffolds inside neurons, and the paper treats tryptophan amino acids embedded in those scaffolds as chromophore networks capable of generating coherence, routing correlations, and producing measurable entanglement. The researchers use a Lindblad master-equation approach with explicit geometries and dipole orientations to calculate metrics such as logarithmic negativity, a standard measure of how strongly two quantum systems are linked. In plain terms, the work asks whether the geometry of a brain protein can do what an engineered quantum chip does: hold and move quantum states long enough for them to matter.
This is not the first attempt to frame neuroproteins in quantum language. A separate preprint extends the superradiance concept to actin and amyloid, arguing that collective light–matter interactions in these structures produce quantum-enhanced photoprotection and quantum yield robustness. That work also relies on a Lindblad open-system approach, but applies it to different cytoskeletal and pathological protein assemblies, suggesting that similar mathematical tools can describe both healthy signaling and disease-related aggregates. Together, the two papers suggest that quantum effects in the brain may not be limited to a single protein type but could appear across several neuroprotein architectures, each exploiting collective quantum behavior for a distinct biological function.
Gravity, Collapse, and the Penrose Connection
The theoretical bridge between brain proteins and the cosmos runs through a proposal by physicist Roger Penrose. In his foundational paper published in General Relativity and Gravitation, Penrose argued that gravity can drive collapse of quantum states, offering a heuristic collapse-time estimate tied to gravitational self-energy. In this view, a quantum superposition does not need an observer to collapse; gravity itself forces the system to pick a definite state once the mass displacement between branches reaches a threshold. That mechanism operates everywhere, from a dust grain to a galaxy cluster, which is why some theorists see it as a universal process rather than a laboratory curiosity, and why it naturally invites speculation about links between cosmic structure and microscopic biology.
Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff built on that idea in their Orchestrated Objective Reduction theory, reviewed in a detailed article in Physics of Life Reviews. The review links microtubules inside neurons to the same gravity-related objective reduction, proposing that orchestrated quantum computations in those structures produce conscious experience. The theory was met with deep skepticism for years, largely because engineered quantum computing requires extreme cold to avoid thermal decoherence, and the brain is warm, wet, and electrically noisy. The February 2026 microtubule preprint does not prove Orch OR correct, but it supplies the kind of explicit quantum modeling the theory has long lacked, showing at least theoretically that entanglement metrics in tryptophan networks are not trivially zero and can persist on biologically relevant timescales under certain assumptions.
Experimental Constraints and Skeptical Pushback
Theory alone cannot settle the question, and laboratory evidence has complicated the picture. An underground experiment at Gran Sasso, designed to detect radiation that gravity-related collapse models predict, set stringent bounds that rule out a natural parameter-free version of the model originally proposed by Lajos Diosi. Diosi’s early work in Physics Letters A introduced a gravity-modified dynamics via a master equation, and it remains one of the original mechanisms in what physicists call the Diosi-Penrose collapse framework. The Gran Sasso result does not eliminate every variant of the model, but it narrows the parameter space significantly, meaning any surviving version must be fine-tuned in ways the original formulation did not require, and that has direct implications for how confidently one can invoke gravitational collapse inside neurons.
Separate analysis published in Physical Review D adds another wrinkle by considering what Diosi-Penrose dynamics would predict for gravitationally mediated entanglement tests. That peer-reviewed theory paper examines how hypothetical experiments on entangled test masses would behave and concludes that observing such entanglement would not automatically validate quantum gravity, because certain classical-gravity models of the Diosi–Penrose type may generate entanglement under specific conditions. In other words, even a positive experimental result could be consistent with a universe where gravity is classical rather than quantum, which would change what the “shared process” between mind and cosmos actually is. Meanwhile, a peer-reviewed analysis in PNAS examining Frohlich-like coherence has served as a skeptical reference point, questioning whether long-lived macroscopic coherence of the type some consciousness theories require is physically realistic in warm biological tissue and emphasizing the energy thresholds and damping mechanisms that tend to destroy ordered oscillations.
Where Nuclear Spin and Cosmic Chemistry Fit In
Beyond microtubules, researchers have explored other quantum candidates inside the brain, often focusing on degrees of freedom that might be more shielded from environmental noise. One line of work emphasizes nuclear spins in certain atoms as potential long-lived qubits, arguing that their weak coupling to the environment could allow them to preserve coherence far longer than electronic or vibrational states in proteins. These proposals typically envision nuclear spins embedded in biomolecules or membranes, entangled through biochemical reactions or electromagnetic interactions, and then read out indirectly via conventional neural signaling, though concrete experimental evidence for such mechanisms in vivo remains limited.
Another speculative avenue connects quantum biology in the brain to quantum processes in cosmic chemistry, drawing analogies between how entangled states can steer reaction pathways in astrophysical environments and how similar mechanisms might bias signaling cascades in neurons. In this view, the same basic quantum toolkit (coherence, tunneling, superposition) helps shape both the synthesis of complex molecules in interstellar clouds and the dynamics of neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels. While these parallels are largely conceptual, they motivate searches for shared mathematical structures and conservation laws that could unify descriptions of matter across scales, from the formation of prebiotic molecules to the emergence of subjective experience.
A Debate Moving from Philosophy Toward Testable Physics
Taken together, the recent microtubule modeling, the broader protein-based superradiance proposals, and the tightening experimental constraints on collapse models are pushing the mind-universe question out of purely philosophical territory and into the domain of testable physics. On one side, detailed open-system calculations show that biologically realistic protein geometries can, in principle, support nontrivial entanglement and coherent energy transfer, challenging the assumption that the warm, wet brain must be entirely classical. On the other, underground detectors and careful theoretical analyses demonstrate that many simple versions of gravity-induced collapse are incompatible with observed noise levels or fail to provide clean signatures that would distinguish quantum from classical gravity, underscoring how easy it is to overinterpret suggestive mathematical analogies.
The emerging consensus among cautious researchers is not that consciousness has been “explained” by quantum mechanics, nor that the brain has been proven to host gravity-linked qubits, but that the question can be sharpened into falsifiable claims. Does microtubule entanglement survive long enough to influence firing thresholds? Can nuclear spins in biomolecules maintain coherence under realistic metabolic conditions? Will future gravitational entanglement experiments close off entire classes of collapse theories or reveal unexpected correlations that demand new physics? As theoretical tools mature and experiments improve, the connection between the quantum structure of matter and the structure of subjective experience may eventually be framed less as a metaphysical puzzle and more as a concrete problem in condensed-matter physics, quantum information, and neuroscience.
More from Morning Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
