Engineers have turned one of nature’s most reviled body parts into a precision tool, using the hollow feeding tubes of dead mosquitoes to print structures smaller than a human blood cell. The approach, dubbed necroprinting, pushes 3D printing into a regime that conventional metal and plastic nozzles struggle to reach, while promising lower costs and less waste. Instead of machining ever finer tips, researchers are harvesting a ready-made microchannel that evolution has already optimized for slipping through skin and moving fluid with minimal damage.
By treating the mosquito proboscis as a disposable, biodegradable nozzle, the teams behind this work are reframing what counts as a manufacturing component. I see this as part of a broader shift in engineering, where biological parts are no longer just inspiration for designs but are being integrated directly into machines to achieve resolutions and material properties that standard hardware cannot match.
How necroprinting turns a mosquito into a micro-nozzle
The core idea of necroprinting is disarmingly simple: instead of fabricating an ultra-fine nozzle from metal or glass, researchers take the proboscis of a euthanized mosquito and mount it on a 3D printer as if it were a standard tip. Under a microscope, the mouthpart that normally pierces skin becomes a tiny extrusion channel, guiding viscous inks into lines and dots that are narrower than many cells. Reports describe how Scientists examined the structure of the mosquito’s bloodsucking mouth under magnification, then adapted it as a high resolution 3D printer nozzle that rivals the smallest commercial metal tips.
In practice, necroprinting involves carefully removing the proboscis, cleaning and stabilizing it, and then attaching it to a custom holder that interfaces with the printer’s motion system and fluid feed. One detailed account notes that the dead mosquito proboscis is used as a high resolution 3D printing nozzle, with the Dead insect anatomy delivering extremely fine output that is 100 percent finer than some conventional tips, cheaper to produce, and fully biodegradable.
Why mosquito anatomy beats machined metal at tiny scales
What makes the mosquito proboscis so effective as a nozzle is the way evolution has tuned its geometry and internal channels for stealthy, low force penetration and efficient fluid transport. The feeding tube is long, slender and reinforced, with a lumen that is narrow enough to minimize trauma yet wide enough to move blood at useful rates, a balance that turns out to be ideal for extruding micro-scale filaments of printing ink. Researchers in McGill’s Department of Mechanical Engineering and at Drexel University emphasize that this natural structure can outperform some commercial micro-nozzles while reducing environmental waste and health concerns associated with synthetic materials.
By leveraging the proboscis as a ready-made microfluidic channel, necroprinting sidesteps the fabrication limits that plague ultra-fine metal and polymer tips, which can clog, deform or break under pressure. One technical overview of the biohybrid method reports that the approach achieves around 20 micrometer resolution, a scale that is smaller than many blood cells, and notes that this performance outpaces several commercial micro-nozzles while also offering a biodegradable alternative to conventional hardware. The same work situates the mosquito-based nozzle alongside other biological conduits, such as spider fangs and plant xylem vessels, as part of a broader class of biohybrid nozzles that can enable sustainable microscale manufacturing.
From lab-reared insects to printable microstructures
Necroprinting is not a matter of scooping up wild mosquitoes and taping them to a printer; it depends on controlled, lab-reared insects and a repeatable preparation workflow. One description explains that the method is Dubbed 3D necroprinting and integrates euthanized, lab-reared mosquito anatomy directly into precision printing setups, turning the insects into a low cost, biodegradable nozzle for ultra fine 3D printing. That framing matters, because it underscores that the animals are part of a controlled research pipeline rather than an ad hoc scavenging exercise.
Once mounted, the mosquito-based nozzle can lay down intricate microstructures, from narrow lines and lattices to tiny pillars and dots that approach subcellular dimensions. Reporting on the technique notes that the new necroprinting approach uses mosquito feeding tubes for 3D printing below cell scale, with the insect anatomy serving as a functional manufacturing tool rather than a mere curiosity. In that account, the work is presented as a way to push resolution beyond what many commercial systems can manage, using New bio-derived nozzles that are both precise and disposable.
Biohybrid engineering and the rise of necroprinting
I see necroprinting as a vivid example of biohybrid engineering, where living or once-living materials are integrated into mechanical systems to exploit properties that are hard to reproduce synthetically. A detailed research overview situates 3D necroprinting within a lineage of designs that borrow directly from nature, noting that Nature has long inspired engineering innovations and that recent advances in biohybrid research have taken this inspiration further by using biotic material itself as the nozzle for microscale manufacturing. In that framing, the mosquito proboscis is not a gimmick but a proof of concept for a broader class of bio-integrated tools.
The same analysis argues that using biological nozzles can enable sustainable microscale manufacturing by reducing reliance on non biodegradable plastics and metals, while also tapping into geometries that evolution has refined over millions of years. I read this as a challenge to the default assumption that every component in a high tech system must be machined or printed from scratch. Instead, necroprinting suggests that some of the most effective microfluidic parts may already exist in the natural world, waiting to be repurposed as functional nozzles, valves or channels inside next generation fabrication platforms.
Cost, scalability and the craft of making mosquito nozzles
For any new fabrication technology, the question quickly shifts from “does it work” to “can it scale,” and necroprinting is no exception. One of the researchers, identified as Cao, says an experienced worker can make six nozzles an hour from mosquito mouthparts at a cost of less than a dollar each, a figure that immediately positions the technique as a low cost alternative to precision machined tips. That kind of throughput suggests that a small lab could stockpile dozens of nozzles in a single afternoon, enough to support extensive experimentation or even small batch production.
Of course, the process still requires skill and infrastructure, from rearing mosquitoes to dissecting and mounting their proboscises without damaging the delicate channels. Yet the economics are compelling when compared with high precision metal or glass nozzles that can cost orders of magnitude more and still fall short of the same resolution. One report on dead mosquito proboscis nozzles notes that the biological tips are finer, cheaper and biodegradable, and that high precision 3D printing nozzles are typically made from non biodegradable plastic or metal, which adds both cost and environmental burden. In that light, necroprinting looks less like a quirky lab trick and more like a pragmatic way to democratize access to ultra fine printing hardware.
Environmental and ethical dimensions of printing with dead insects
Using dead mosquitoes as printer parts raises immediate questions about ethics and environmental impact, even if the insects themselves are widely seen as pests. The teams behind necroprinting emphasize that they rely on euthanized, lab-reared mosquitoes rather than wild populations, which allows them to control breeding conditions and avoid unintended ecological effects. The biodegradable nature of the proboscis nozzles also means that, unlike metal or plastic tips, they will not persist in landfills or the environment for decades once discarded, a point underscored in accounts that highlight how the proboscis is 100 percent finer than some commercial tips, cheaper and biodegradable while conventional high precision nozzles are made from non biodegradable materials.
There is also a broader ethical conversation about how far biohybrid engineering should go in repurposing animal parts, even from species that spread disease. I find it notable that researchers in McGill’s Department of Mechanical Engineering and at Drexel University explicitly frame their work in terms of reducing environmental waste and health concerns, suggesting that they see necroprinting as a net positive compared with current manufacturing practices. That framing aligns with the research overview that presents 3D necroprinting as a way to enable sustainable microscale manufacturing by using biotic material as the nozzle, rather than adding more synthetic waste to an already crowded ecosystem of discarded lab hardware.
Potential applications in medicine, microfluidics and beyond
The ability to print structures at or below cell scale opens up obvious opportunities in biomedical engineering, from scaffolds that guide tissue growth to microfluidic channels that mimic capillaries. Reporting on the dead mosquito proboscis nozzle notes that the discovery could have applications in fields such as dentistry and biomedical research, where high precision 3D printing is already used to create custom implants, models and lab devices. If necroprinting can reliably produce finer features at lower cost, it could make it easier for small clinics and research groups to fabricate bespoke tools without relying on expensive industrial services.
Beyond medicine, ultra fine printing could reshape how sensors, flexible electronics and lab on a chip systems are manufactured, especially when combined with conductive or responsive inks. One account of the mosquito based nozzles points out that the proboscis is significantly finer than the smallest commercial metal tips, which suggests that necroprinting could be used to draw narrower conductive traces or more intricate microfluidic networks than many current systems allow. In that sense, the mosquito nozzle is not just a curiosity for biologists but a potential workhorse for any field that needs precise control over fluid deposition at tens of micrometers or below.
Accessibility, barriers to entry and who gets to use necroprinting
One of the more intriguing aspects of necroprinting is how it might change who can access high resolution 3D printing. A detailed narrative on the mosquito proboscis work notes that the researchers are interested in lowering costs and removing barriers to entry, a goal that aligns with the low per nozzle price reported by Cao and others. In that account, readers are invited to Listen to the story and even Got feedback or Take a survey and See the AI policy, which underscores how public engagement is part of the conversation around this technology.
If a lab can produce six ultra fine nozzles an hour for less than a dollar each, as Cao describes, then high resolution printing is no longer the exclusive domain of institutions that can afford specialized metal tips and proprietary systems. I see this as a potential inflection point similar to the arrival of low cost fused filament printers a decade ago, which turned 3D printing from an industrial niche into a hobbyist and educational tool. Necroprinting could do something similar at the microscale, provided that protocols for rearing mosquitoes, preparing proboscises and integrating them into printers are documented and shared widely enough for others to replicate.
From curiosity to tool: where necroprinting goes next
For now, necroprinting sits at the boundary between eye catching curiosity and practical tool, a place where many emerging technologies linger before either fading or taking off. Coverage that greets readers with the line Welcome to necroprinting emphasizes that the idea is to replace expensive, hard to manufacture metal nozzles with mosquito proboscises that are quite a bit cheaper, suggesting a clear path from novelty to cost saving component. At the same time, the technique still depends on delicate biological material that may vary from insect to insect, which means standardization and quality control will be crucial if it is to move beyond a handful of research labs.
Looking ahead, I expect necroprinting to spur experiments with other biological nozzles, from spider fangs to plant xylem, as already hinted in the biohybrid research overview. The broader 3D necroprinting framework described in that work imagines a family of biotic nozzles that can be swapped in and out depending on the desired resolution, flow rate or material compatibility. If that vision holds, the mosquito proboscis may be remembered as the first in a line of natural microtools that helped push 3D printing below the scale of individual cells, not by pushing machining to its limits but by recognizing that some of the finest nozzles were already hiding in plain sight on the bodies of insects.
More from MorningOverview