NASA’s veteran Mars orbiter MAVEN has slipped into an unnerving quiet, cutting off a decade of continuous atmospheric monitoring from high above the red planet. Engineers are now racing to understand why the spacecraft stopped talking to Earth and how a mission designed to study how Mars lost its air has itself been thrown into a precarious new state.
What is clear so far is that MAVEN is not simply “dead” in space, but in trouble, spinning and hard to hear, while ground teams work through a methodical recovery playbook that could take weeks to play out. I will walk through what went wrong, what the latest telemetry reveals, and why this single orbiter matters so much to both Mars science and the daily operations of robots on the surface.
How a decade-old Mars workhorse suddenly went quiet
MAVEN’s silence did not arrive as a slow fade, it came as a sharp break in a mission that had been operating as expected in orbit around Mars. The orbiter, one of three spacecraft routinely circling the planet’s upper atmosphere, had been functioning normally before it suddenly ceased communications with Earth, leaving controllers without the steady stream of data they had come to rely on from a probe that had been circling Mars for years. That abrupt cutoff turned a mature mission into an active anomaly investigation almost overnight, with teams forced to reconstruct the final hours from the last fragments of tracking data.
NASA has confirmed that it has lost contact with MAVEN, a spacecraft that launched in 2013 and began orbiting Mars about 10 months later, and that the mission had been studying how the planet experienced atmospheric loss before the blackout interrupted its work, a disruption detailed in a report on lost contact. The orbiter, described as one of three zooming around Mars’ atmosphere, had been working as expected before it suddenly ceased communicating, a status captured in coverage of NASA loses contact. NASA’s own update, titled Teams Work MAVEN Spacecraft Signal Loss, confirms that NASA’s MAVEN (Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN) spacecraft, in orbit around Mars, was expected to be heard during a scheduled pass when ground stations did not observe a signal at all.
The launch, the long cruise, and what MAVEN was built to do
To understand what is at stake, I need to go back to how MAVEN got to Mars and what it was designed to measure. The 11-foot-tall orbiter left Earth in Nov, riding a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket that thundered away from Cape Canavera on a trajectory that would carry it across interplanetary space and into Mars orbit roughly 10 months later. That launch from Florida was the start of a mission explicitly built to answer a single, sweeping question: how a once wetter, thicker-aired Mars became the cold, thin-skied world we see today.
NASA’s own description of the mission notes that MAVEN, formally the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN probe, launched in 2013 and was placed into orbit to study the upper atmosphere and its interaction with the solar wind, a role summarized in a technical overview of The Mars Atmosphere and Volatile. Within just weeks of arriving at Mars, MAVEN observed oxygen, carbon and hydrogen escaping from the planet’s atmosphere into space, showing that the loss of air was primarily driven by the Sun, a result highlighted in a mission profile that notes how quickly Within just weeks of arriving, MAVEN was already catching atmospheric particles in the act of fleeing to space. A separate launch account points out that the 11-foot-tall MAVEN orbiter launched Nov. 18, 2013, atop a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from the Cape Canavera area, a Florida departure that set up the spacecraft’s long-term role orbiting Mars studying its atmosphere, as described in a detailed look at the MAVEN orbiter launched.
Inside the blackout: what NASA says actually happened
The communications failure itself unfolded as a classic deep-space anomaly: a scheduled contact that never materialized, followed by a scramble to verify whether the problem was on Earth or on the spacecraft. NASA’s blog explains that ground stations were configured to listen for MAVEN during a routine pass, but the antennas did not detect any signal, prompting engineers to declare a spacecraft-side issue and begin contingency procedures. That initial silence was later framed as a “communication blackout” that temporarily silenced the orbiter, a phrase that captures both the technical loss of signal and the sudden information vacuum about the spacecraft’s health.
NASA’s own account underlines that NASA’s MAVEN (Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN) spacecraft, in orbit around Mars, was expected to be heard when ground stations did not observe a signal, a sequence laid out in the agency’s Teams Work MAVEN Spacecraft Signal Loss update. A separate report describes how a communication blackout temporarily silenced NASA’s MAVEN orbiter, a crucial source of data on Mars’ atmosphere, and notes that engineers (shortened in the summary as Engi) were immediately drawn into an intensive effort to bring the spacecraft back from a state so far from Earth, a situation captured in coverage of how A communication blackout affected MAVEN around Mars. Another summary notes that the orbiter, one of three zooming around Mars’ atmosphere, had been working as expected before it suddenly ceased communicating, and that telemetry data had showed all systems normal before the loss of contact, a contrast that underscores how quickly a stable mission can tip into crisis, as described in the account of telemetry data before the blackout.
Spinning, rotating, and the first clues from faint telemetry
Once the initial shock of silence passed, the next breakthrough came from a sliver of tracking data that hinted at what MAVEN was physically doing in orbit. That fragment suggested the spacecraft was no longer in its expected, carefully controlled orientation but instead was rotating in an unexpected manner, a condition that can wreak havoc on communications, power generation and thermal control. In practical terms, a spinning orbiter can end up pointing its high-gain antenna away from Earth and its solar arrays away from the Sun, forcing it into a survival mode that relies on backup systems and low-gain antennas.
According to NASA, a fragment of tracking data received on December 6 indicates that MAVEN was rotating in an “unexpected manner,” a key clue that has shaped the recovery strategy and was highlighted in an analysis that begins, “Dec, According to NASA, a fragment of tracking data received on December 6 indicates that MAVEN was rotating in an ‘unexpected manner’,” as detailed in the report that opens with According to NASA. Another technical update notes that telemetry shows changes to the spacecraft’s orbit and rotation, confirming that the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN probe launched in 2013 is no longer flying the trajectory and attitude it was designed to hold, a situation described in the piece that credits Jeff Foust December with outlining those orbital and rotational changes. A separate account bluntly states that the Spacecraft was ‘rotating in an unexpected manner’ and might have shifted orbit, a characterization that appears in a report by Spacecraft was ‘rotating that also notes how such a rotation complicates efforts to restore stable communications with controllers.
Is MAVEN really “lost,” or is it still alive out there?
From the outside, it is tempting to label any silent spacecraft as lost, but the reality with MAVEN is more nuanced and, for now, more hopeful. The key distinction is between a probe that has stopped functioning entirely and one that is still powered, still transmitting something, but not in a configuration that allows normal science or robust communication. In MAVEN’s case, multiple reports stress that the spacecraft is still emitting signals on a backup antenna, even as its main systems remain out of reach, which is why engineers have not written off the mission.
Technically, MAVEN is “still alive and transmitting on the low-gain antenna!” as Germany’s arm of the amateur radio operations community has emphasized, a detail that underscores that the spacecraft is not a dead hulk but a struggling asset, as described in coverage that notes how Technically, MAVEN is still sending faint signals. Another report notes that operators stated December 15th that, although no telemetry was received from the spacecraft since December 4th, a small signal was still being detected, a nuance captured in a summary that begins “Dec, Operators stated December 15th that, although no telemetry was received from the spacecraft since December 4th, a small signal was still being detected,” as laid out in the analysis of how Operators stated the mission’s status. NASA’s own language is careful, describing teams working the MAVEN spacecraft signal loss rather than declaring the mission over, and emphasizing that NASA’s MAVEN (Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN) spacecraft is the focus of continuing efforts to restore contact, a stance spelled out in the agency’s NASA Teams Work update.
Why this orbiter matters so much for Mars science
MAVEN’s predicament is not just a technical drama, it is a potential blow to one of the most productive atmospheric science missions ever flown at Mars. The spacecraft’s instruments have been measuring how solar particles and radiation strip away gases from the upper atmosphere, providing a direct link between present-day escape and the ancient climate shift that turned Mars from a world that could host rivers and lakes into the dry planet we see now. Losing that continuous record, even temporarily, risks leaving gaps in a data set that researchers use to tie solar storms, seasonal changes and long-term trends into a coherent picture of atmospheric loss.
Within just weeks of arriving at Mars, MAVEN observed oxygen, carbon and hydrogen escaping from the planet’s atmosphere into space, and those early results showed that the loss of air was primarily driven by the Sun, a finding that has shaped nearly a decade of follow-up work and is detailed in the mission overview that notes how quickly Mars, MAVEN began capturing escape processes. Another summary emphasizes that MAVEN has been a crucial source of data on Mars’ atmosphere, with a communication blackout temporarily silencing that stream of information, a role highlighted in the report that describes how NASA, MAVEN and Mars are linked through this atmospheric monitoring. A separate analysis notes that NASA has lost contact with MAVEN, a spacecraft that launched in 2013 and began orbiting Mars about 10 months later, and that the mission has been central to understanding how the planet experienced atmospheric loss, a scientific focus described in the piece on NASA, MAVEN and Mars.
The ripple effect on Perseverance, Curiosity and other Mars assets
MAVEN’s troubles also have immediate operational consequences because the orbiter is part of the relay network that ferries data between surface missions and Earth. Rovers like Perseverance and Curiosity depend on orbiters to receive their transmissions and then beam them home, a setup that allows far more data to flow than the rovers’ own antennas could manage alone. When one of those relay nodes falters, the others must pick up the slack, and mission planners have to reshuffle communication schedules to keep every asset talking.
One report notes that MAVEN has been a key relay for NASA’s Perseverance and Curiosity rovers, and that with the spacecraft spinning helplessly, other orbiters will have to shoulder an even greater burden to keep surface missions supplied with communication windows, a situation described in the account that explains how NASA’s Perseverance and Curiosity will be supported by backup assets. Another summary points out that NASA loses contact with its Maven spacecraft orbiting Mars for the past decade, and that CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. based teams have stressed that other orbiters can still capture the crackling sounds and data from NASA’s Perseverance rover on Mars, a reminder that redundancy is built into the network, as described in the piece that notes how NASA loses contact with its Maven spacecraft. NASA’s own planning guidance adds that for the next two weeks of scheduled surface operations, NASA is arranging additional passes from the remaining orbiters to ensure that landers and rovers can continue their science missions, a contingency described in the update that begins “Dec, For the next two weeks of scheduled surface operations, NASA is arranging additional passes from the remaining orbiters,” as outlined in the discussion of how For the next two weeks the network will adapt.
Inside the recovery playbook: how engineers are trying to save MAVEN
Recovering a spinning, partially responsive spacecraft at Mars is a slow, methodical process that relies on physics, patience and a deep understanding of the vehicle’s design. Engineers must first stabilize the rotation enough to keep solar panels illuminated and antennas roughly pointed toward Earth, often by commanding thruster firings or switching to safe-mode algorithms that were written years earlier for just such contingencies. Every command has to be carefully timed and tested, because a misstep could worsen the spin or deplete precious fuel, and the round-trip light time to Mars means there is no real-time joystick control, only sequences sent and then evaluated hours later.
NASA’s blog on the anomaly explains that teams are working the MAVEN spacecraft signal loss by using the Deep Space Network to search for any sign of the spacecraft and then, once a faint signal is found, by attempting to lock onto it and send basic recovery commands, a process described in the agency’s Teams Work MAVEN Spacecraft Signal Loss narrative. Another technical report notes that telemetry shows changes to spacecraft orbit and rotation, and that mission controllers are using that information to refine their models and guide continuing efforts to restore contact, a strategy outlined in the analysis of continuing efforts to stabilize MAVEN. A separate account adds that the Spacecraft was ‘rotating in an unexpected manner’ and might have shifted orbit, and that engineers are working through scenarios to see how communications with controllers can be restored, a recovery playbook described in the report by Richard Speed that also notes the timing as Wed in its summary.
The mystery still unsolved: what caused the signal loss?
For all the detail about MAVEN’s current state, one crucial piece of the puzzle remains missing: the root cause of the anomaly. Engineers know the spacecraft is rotating unexpectedly and that its orbit has shifted, but they do not yet have a definitive explanation for what triggered that change, whether it was a hardware failure, a software glitch, an external event like a micrometeoroid strike, or some combination of factors. Until more telemetry is recovered, the investigation is constrained by the limited data that slipped through before the blackout and the behavior of the spacecraft since.
One account captures the uncertainty bluntly, noting that after a decade in space, MAVEN went mysteriously silent and that the cause of the signal loss is currently unknown, a mystery framed in the report that begins “Dec, After a decade in space, MAVEN went mysteriously silent. By Cassidy Ward Dec, NASA’s MAVEN spacecraft…” and emphasizes that the signal loss is currently unknown, as described in the piece that highlights how After a decade the spacecraft fell quiet. A related summary, introduced with the phrase “Dec, Houston, We Have, Problem, NASA, Has Lost Contact With the MAVEN Mars Orbiter,” underscores that NASA Has Lost Contact With the MAVEN Mars Orbiter and that the signal loss is currently unknown, a framing that reinforces how little is confirmed about the underlying failure, as laid out in the account titled Houston, We Have a Problem. Another report notes that NASA has lost contact with MAVEN, a spacecraft that launched in 2013 and began orbiting Mars about 10 months later, and that the mission’s long record of studying how the planet experienced atmospheric loss has been interrupted without a clear cause, a gap in understanding described in the analysis of how Dec, NASA is now confronting this unexplained silence.
What comes next for MAVEN and Mars exploration
In the near term, MAVEN’s fate hinges on whether engineers can gradually coax the spacecraft back into a stable orientation and reestablish a reliable telemetry link. That process could unfold over weeks, with incremental gains such as locking onto the low-gain signal, commanding safe mode, and then, if all goes well, bringing instruments and the high-gain antenna back online. Even if full recovery proves impossible, any additional data about the spacecraft’s condition will help NASA refine its models and design more resilient systems for future Mars orbiters.
Looking further ahead, the episode is a reminder that every long-lived mission at Mars is operating on borrowed time, and that the network of orbiters and landers must be continually refreshed to avoid single points of failure. NASA loses contact with its Maven spacecraft orbiting Mars for the past decade, a milestone that underscores both the mission’s longevity and its vulnerability, as noted in the report that describes how Mars for the last ten years has relied on this orbiter. Another analysis stresses that NASA has lost contact with MAVEN, a spacecraft that launched in 2013 and began orbiting Mars about 10 months later, and that the mission’s work on atmospheric loss has set a high bar for whatever comes next, a legacy described in the piece that opens with “Dec, NASA has lost contact with MAVEN,” as detailed in the discussion of MAVEN, Mars and atmospheric escape. A separate report notes that NASA has lost contact with its Maven spacecraft orbiting Mars for the past decade and that CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. based teams are already emphasizing the need for other orbiters to continue supporting both science and relay duties, a forward-looking stance captured in the summary that highlights CAPE and CANAVERAL in its description of the mission’s origins and future implications.
More from MorningOverview